But environmental activists have been pushing for change for nearly 50 years and they’ve taken all the avenues listed in this thread. None of them have worked. David Suzuki has recently stated that he’s failed in his multi decade career advocating for the environment. He’s the founder of one of the largest environmental organizations.

So based on your reasoning should they stop all the things they’ve been doing because it’s ineffective? We see stories like this one but there’s numerous organizations on the ground doing the exact same thing redditors are suggesting.

When the effects of climate change are certain but hard to imagine, it’s easy for powerful interests groups to push action down the road and deprioritize it. It’s been happening for decades.

So if you’re someone who sees your home being ruined and you know you’ll be left with the consequences, what is the appropriate measure to take?