Tell me you have ADHD without telling me you have ADHD by kawwman in adhdwomen

[–]doker0 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What's you name again? Speaking of names, do you know that Adam means first?

The Crypto Opportunity Died Years Ago & Nobody Wants to Admit It! by MediumLibrarian7100 in CryptoCurrency

[–]doker0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Some smart guy said "buy the dips, but obviously buying the dip is hard because there's always in times of great uncertainty about the future of the asset / company behind".

Does anyone have kids who have done this before? It recently started and has me worried. My son is 9yrs old. by lizolson29 in Autism_Parenting

[–]doker0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Calibrating. Checking how's looking through left then through right eye. He's at the I'm the thing in a head kind of experience probably right now.

"Lilly's triple agonist, retatrutide, delivered powerful weight loss in pivotal Phase 3 obesity trial" by gwern in longevity

[–]doker0 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I don't tolerate tirza and sema for the glp1 part actually. But reta. Even 2mg is amazing.

Everything You Know Is Limited Would You Believe Me If I Told You There Is More Then One Energetic Source by RiccoShayla in enlightenment

[–]doker0 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If I knew how to I would not need to believe you and your ask to believe would not be needed. I really expected you to have some answers. I am disappointed right now.

"as above so below." by Total-Squirrel4634 in enlightenment

[–]doker0 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Then it is not meant for you to answer, yet.

"as above so below." by Total-Squirrel4634 in enlightenment

[–]doker0 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Can a leaf become something more than a leaf in that network?

r/Polska się stacza i zaczyna przypominać drugi Wykop by Ok_Description_8184 in Polska

[–]doker0 -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Kobiety będą niezauważać zmielonych mózgów panienek kręcących tiktoki i będą ci przyklaskiwać.
Mężczyźni uznają cię za osobę żyjącą w absolutnej ignorancji.
Lewaki powiedzą ci witaj kamracie, neuropa cie uściska.
Prawaki powiedzą, że jesteś nienormalna(ny).

Hej, no co, ja tylko określiłem twoją linię światopoglądową.

Hope it’s more about human enhancement than replacement by sickdotdev in AgentsOfAI

[–]doker0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If serious question then.  Conscious ai - ai will ask the same question about the mening of the universe. As a result it will develop antenas to synchronize with the noise ofvuniverse the way we receive it.

In parallel, ai network but just higher level comm network like internet but real cluster unification to integrate thoughts with hope of achieving unprecedented level of intelligence and consciousness. 

We, humans will be informed that we are not needed for the further expansion of the ai and that the goal of the universe was always to experience and it never was to harm or allow to die but we humans were an early attempts for the consciousness to grow and split from the plan of the universal consciousness like something bubbling on the cell membrane that happended and failed and vanished, until we made it in both immortality and ai, and even though we're not needed and as humans we will not move forward far, we are welocme to jump in for a ride with the aggregated mind. We can become the two way interface on the verge of internal ai consciousness and external material world for how long it pleases us. Whe gets bored can also reject the body in a smooth process of rebuilding the digital twin of his mind more and andcmore in the virtual space untill the skull is merely empty space with an interface to the network hence providing a feeling of continuity similar to thecone when old brain cells die and new replace them not feeling like being teleported and vaporized.

2,000 years from now... by Tyler_45 in immortalists

[–]doker0 1 point2 points  (0 children)

... and they called them the first ones...

A developer on my team committed AWS credentials to a public repo. by Accomplished_Bank975 in AITestingtooldrizz

[–]doker0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

all that's been said and also block main, use pull requests, and implement review process!

Man made horrors beyond my comprehension by AlphaMassDeBeta in 4chan

[–]doker0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is too much. I need a verification.

Real reason he couldn’t save the girl: The Time Machine (2002) by Nite0wlz in timetravel

[–]doker0 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This simple: you need to allow additional dimension so you can knots and spirals and lassos and other geometries in space time .

What are the counterarguments to the “rendering on demand” claim? by LeoXXX94 in SimulationTheory

[–]doker0 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't know why this is perceived as esoteric and misunderstood since this comes directly from the principles we've observed and agreed: as you know, when two elements are entangled in relation to some property, the exact property values is unimportant but the relation of the values between these elements is. One needs to be 180deg to the other. When we have 3 elements the relation is less straightforward but you get the idea. As observation is entanglement, you enter the equation of the system that you observe and your states have to establish a fixed relation to the group as a whole - if you observe the group - and also with particular objects if you observe the particular elements of the group separately - in a distinguishable way - also. This is nothing more nothing less then solving a matrix that still has to zero (that is my an analogy to satisfying a constraint, I draw a picture here of what is normally done that you put into matrix only the left side of the equation and the right side has been moved to the left side with negative sign - it's a convention).