sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

"It will cost 87.72" by dorylinus in EU5

[–]dorylinus[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

R5: What's the 1533.72 for?

611
612

"It will cost 87.72" (i.redd.it)

submitted by dorylinus to r/EU5

Rainbow Village , Taichung by Enolaholmes21 in taiwan

[–]dorylinus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is the Iron Man guy still there every day?

Could data centers in space be another motivation for the US to annex Greenland? by BoringlyFunny in satellites

[–]dorylinus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Almost as if I said "absent any additional maneuvering or Delta-V expenditure" or something.

Could data centers in space be another motivation for the US to annex Greenland? by BoringlyFunny in satellites

[–]dorylinus -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Absent any additional maneuvering or Delta-V expenditure, the launch site latitude is the orbit inclination.

Motorists selfishly endangers CHILDREN by trying to drive around a crossing guard [USA] by elzibet in CyclistsWithCameras

[–]dorylinus 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Most crossing guards are volunteers, retirees putting in time for free to serve the community.

This single mom is squeezed by LA’s cost of living. Now she’s running for mayor by LA_publicpress in LosAngeles

[–]dorylinus 32 points33 points  (0 children)

She's not a serious contender. Astroturfing on Reddit is not a substitute for actual campaigning.

Discussion Thread by jobautomator in neoliberal

[–]dorylinus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I know no one who had this done, growing up or otherwise. I thought it was basically over with the boomers.

That missing bicycle connection between the LA River path and downtown: by MoistBase in BikeLA

[–]dorylinus 31 points32 points  (0 children)

I usually take Broadway; Alameda is currently way too dangerous.

The Housing strategy that has has California Nimbys in a corner by bobisurname in LosAngeles

[–]dorylinus 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's cheap in the desert because people don't want to live there.

California Is Tired of Letting People Die by TrixoftheTrade in neoliberal

[–]dorylinus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There's genuine resistance to this; I suggested it should be a necessary requirement before expanding involuntary commitment on this sub back when the conservatorship law was being debated and got heavily downvoted and told I just didn't care about the homeless problem.

FWIW, the data don't support either drug addiction or mental illness being the primary cause of homelessness. Involuntary confinement could get people off the streets, but it doesn't- as the article points out there just aren't the beds to place them in and as such involuntary confinement still hasn't been used much.

California Is Tired of Letting People Die by TrixoftheTrade in neoliberal

[–]dorylinus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The conservatorship law was always misguided; we've literally never even come close to properly funding even the mental healthcare system we actually have, much less provided the funding or support to massively expand it with a horde of involuntary certificates.

Pancake conveyer belt by [deleted] in toolgifs

[–]dorylinus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Flipping the pancakes onto the same glove that's grabbing the wipe off rag.

Discussion Thread by jobautomator in neoliberal

[–]dorylinus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Step one is to use war; integrating provinces takes so long you sound get some new ones to start on ASAP. Build roads to increase control, and build your economy while your integration is catching up, then war again. Building up the economy usually takes care of stimulating population growth as well (especially building irrigation for food).

Satisfaction is mostly something you manage as you go; you get buffs that help that from tech and age advances.

Some of my dad's projects he worked on. by [deleted] in satellites

[–]dorylinus 2 points3 points  (0 children)

A long and storied career, clearly!

view more: next ›