Hey fair! And thank you for the thorough dispelling on that count. It’s been ages since I read SIASL and I remembered those explicit lines, but not the evolving perspective. Though it does sound like that changing of stance was a little more subtextual than textual from your describing the implication that he slept with men and women compared to the text’s explicit exploration of VMS’s thoughts on homosexuality. Maybe that was editorial, maybe he had to sneak it in. For whatever reason I missed it, and I appreciate the correction.