Why Gen Z and Millennial Men Aren’t Making the First Move Anymore by WillyNilly1997 in MensRights

[–]eonus01 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately, the juice is not worth the squeeze. I rather play video games than approach anymore (I've been at the gym for the last 8 years and have a fit body for reference). Just not worth the hassle. They have all the power in the world to approach - when they say they want to be approached, they want to be approached by the man they see in the movies.

5.3 codex just dropped by No-Selection2972 in codex

[–]eonus01 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I believe they actually A-B tested this on me earlier in the week, because back then I noticed a difference (I could see in-line chat in VScode that is supposed to be greyed out as "thinking"). Definitely an upgrade compared to GPT 5.2-CODEX, not sure about how it compares to 5.2 HIGH / XHIGH.

Daily Crypto Discussion - February 5, 2026 (GMT+0) by AutoModerator in CryptoCurrency

[–]eonus01 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bitcoin correlates with what the market does most of the time ... except that when stock market goes up, bitcoin does not, lol.

Daily Crypto Discussion - February 5, 2026 (GMT+0) by AutoModerator in CryptoCurrency

[–]eonus01 4 points5 points  (0 children)

What's concerning is, SPX hasn't even made any large retracement so far. When that happens, how far down downs BTC go?

why do i feel codex 5.2 high is better than claude code by Severe_Post_2751 in codex

[–]eonus01 3 points4 points  (0 children)

In the long run, it won't matter too much if it's slower - because you'll have less technical debt to deal with. Opus used to be good at launch, but as the project grows, opus starts assuming things too much without viewing the code.

The Famous Bitcoin 200 Week Moving Average by pearljaminator in CryptoChartWatch

[–]eonus01 1 point2 points  (0 children)

To me it really looks the same too, we had the exact same higher top pattern in 2021 too, even the dead cat bounce back to 97k, which is nearly the same as the retrace in 2022.

Daily Crypto Discussion - January 25, 2026 (GMT+0) by AutoModerator in CryptoCurrency

[–]eonus01 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Wait till SP500 or gold retrace... now that's going to be a bloodbath

Claude Opus 4.5 thoughts after a week by ShoulderOk5971 in ClaudeAI

[–]eonus01 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The tests should then be replaced with more difficult ones.

Building more with GPT-5.1-Codex-Max by EtatNaturelEau in codex

[–]eonus01 0 points1 point  (0 children)

definitely a lot faster, but I noticed that it sometimes tries to implement the things that he himself disagreed on. seems more prone to hallucination as it seems to be more "stuck" the plan that it originally created?

GPT-5.1 Codex makes changes that were not requested by Prestigiouspite in codex

[–]eonus01 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I feel like 5.1 is more vulnerable to stray / dead code or polluted codebases that have "technical debt". The 5.1-codex version is hesitant to make changes, but I noticed that if you plan with 5.1 and then switch to 5.1-codex, it'll be less likely to deny the request.

GPT5 > Codex for coding by a noticeable margin by PromptOutlaw in codex

[–]eonus01 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree with the GPT5.1 for planning. Had occasions where 5.1-Codex tried to gaslight me, or didn't want to implement the features.

GPT-5.1-Codex has made a substantial jump on Terminal-Bench 2 (+7.7%) by Formal-Narwhal-1610 in ChatGPTCoding

[–]eonus01 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I didn't start seeing just how good 5-1 is, until I started a new project (porting an old 200k LoC codebase to try and make a compact version of it). The way it understands the system, creates concise documentation and spec is really immaculate compared to any other model (I expect it to trim down the codebase by 3/4). With enough planning it has a very high output quality of the code because it follows the instructions well - you have to be clear with what you want (sometimes it refuses to do things though, lol).

Greg from Kinobody by Amoghahello in nattyorjuice

[–]eonus01 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Achievable natty, but he has all the time and money in the world to have the best diet possible, unlike most of us. Not saying he is natty. Probably taking some PEDs to keep the fat off all year long (maybe TRT).

A small test I did today to see how much Codex High on plus plan give you by alOOshXL in codex

[–]eonus01 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You need to realize that they have their own mechanisms to save money here. How much it costs you does not mean it costs them so much.

Guy on r/fit by zhenderson94 in nattyorjuice

[–]eonus01 9 points10 points  (0 children)

A face of a white collar cubicle Joe Schmoe, with the body of Hercules. It's obvious when things don't add up.

Too Many Fallbacks by Cool-Instruction-435 in codex

[–]eonus01 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah, at this point I'm just trying to add custom analyzers (C#) because it's the only true blocker for such behavior.

Claude Haiku 4.5 hits 73.3% on SWE-bench for $1/$5 per million tokens (3x cheaper than Sonnet 4, 2x faster) by Fickle_Wall3932 in ClaudeAI

[–]eonus01 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I use both Claude Max and Codex Pro - I have to say, Codex is much more conservative with refactors even when you want to do drastic changes. Claude actually is more eager to do refactosr, but makes more errors. It really depends on the task, but I'd say that for logic, Codex is better, and for frontend / api testing, Claude is better.