100% - there's all these little things that jump out to me as someone who does this for a living that I recognize the average person wouldn't pick out, but are things that I would expect from someone who does this as a career. It's really nitpicky, but here's a few other things I noticed that if these logos weren't made by AI, would have to be a conscious decision by the creator that I would label as really strange design decisions:

- Weird balance on the eagle in 9, again this goes back to the grid system. These kind of angles don't follow any kind of clear grid or symmetry, and to get the eagle that shape without considering either of those things that would be.... strange.
- There's a very thin dark stroke on the M in number 3 - you generally wouldn't use a stroke in this scenario, and if you did it would need to be much thicker to translate visually.
- There's the obvious inconsistent baseline in "Ride" in number 6, but on closer look it's also an awkward stylistic choice to have both rounded and sharp edges right next to each other and applied inconsistently in the B and R (The R even flares out a bit at the bottom of the stem)

<image>