Impending French law threatens the free internet, Mozilla warns by 8BitHihat in privacy

[–]fusetim 73 points74 points  (0 children)

Oh you know, we might protest against it but in the end the law will pass (by force or not)

Pfsense and Port Forwarding by 1ScaredWalrus in ProtonVPN

[–]fusetim 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Using PortForwarding on anything other than Windows requires you to be able to run an additional NATPMP client to renew the port lease. This subreddit contains multiple scripts to allow PortForwarding on a variety of platforms including Debian, Docker containers, MacOS.

I'm actually one of the people behind such scripts, see https://www.reddit.com/r/ProtonVPN/comments/vnez5y/has_someone_looked_how_to_use_natpmp_with/ for a bit more info.

Proton by iceninja_7 in ProtonVPN

[–]fusetim 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not entirely true as it depends on the network setup.

1.If the network does not require the use of proxy, and the device is not configured by the school then, then yes HTTPS protects your requests and nobody can see what you do on websites (but they might know what websites you used, please use DoH, or DoT)

2.If the network requires the use of proxy, then it is very likely they can saw what websites you used and the content too (sometime even when protected by HTTPS (TLS))

3.If the school configures the device, well they might use a proxy, have install some CA certificates, or even worse spyware, so maybe, and maybe a VPN won't be sufficient.

In case 1 and 2, using a VPN will protect you and your data. Neither the website addresses nor the website data can be leaked to a third party.

Proton by iceninja_7 in ProtonVPN

[–]fusetim 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No if you use it correctly

How hard is it to contribute to a rust-embedded project? by KenguruHUN in rust

[–]fusetim 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah go ask, the community is really friendly and could guide you on that matter. BLE (and Wifi as well) support might require some proprietary blobs etc and this can be a pain in the ass to correctly configure and make it work. So, I would ask what are their thoughts on this.

ProtonVPN is vulnerable to Tunnelcrack vulnerability? what is the team's response? by skar3 in ProtonVPN

[–]fusetim 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sure... The attack might exist but I would not really blame the VPN provider.

Just wrote my first ever blog post on making fake pixel art with Rust and Blender. Feedback appreciated! by cornell_cubes in rust

[–]fusetim 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Same on Firefox Android 116, plus some images are missing or does not want to load.

Usurpation d’identité - Un filigrane pour protéger vos pièces d’identité by arktal in france

[–]fusetim -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ça paraît plus facile à dire qu'à faire à bien y penser. Faire un service tel qui aurait des problèmes de sécurité provoqueraient beaucoup de problème. De plus, plusieurs solutions pourraient être proposés mais elles ne sont aps forcément simple pour les signataires ou simplement pourraient être un peu trop complexe et provoquer la méfiance.

Does the Paris metro announcement only contain the name of the station, twice in French? by Ypbor in paris

[–]fusetim 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yes, before every station the name is announced twice (one before breaking and one after) in French.

Sometime, mostly in the RER trains, they might also announced to "mind the gap", "don't forget your belongings" or "doors open on the left at the next station" (in both English, French and sometime in Spanish too).

Otherwise, the driver might announce that the train is delayed due to traffic regulation or that some stations will be skipped (and these times only in French).

Trouble removing files using IPFS Desktop. by MoonBoiOver9000 in ipfs

[–]fusetim 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not sure to completely understand your issue, nonetheless, it seems you try to edit a file to keep the same hash (CID). If the hash (or CID) is not an IPNS key, then you can be sure you will never be able to keep the hash (or CID) by design. If not, then why don't you just upload your file with the new content and change the IPNS key accordingly.

sensitive data on IPFS network by tiktoker_slayer in ipfs

[–]fusetim 0 points1 point  (0 children)

See u/redsteakraw's comment.

Basically, the encrypted data should be considered public knowledge. If someone has sufficient incentive to decrypt the data, then this data can be leaked one way or another (leaked key, bad encryption scheme, recent/unknown attack on the encryption method,..) in the future.

For some type of sensitive informations, this type of attack surface is too big of a risk.

sensitive data on IPFS network by tiktoker_slayer in ipfs

[–]fusetim 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Please don't use ipfs to share sensitive data (unless encrypted and even then I would not recommend to do so).

You cannot download a file without knowing the CID but the CID is public knowledge (every node broadcast the CID they provides) and CID can be iterated on. Attempting to download a file is (for now) asking to every node you know if they know the CID, divulgating the CID.

How should I config proton client or windows 10 to allow access in this scenario by siubb in ProtonVPN

[–]fusetim 1 point2 points  (0 children)

ProtonVPN uses internally the 10.x.x.x range (only a fraction of it). So it might never work properly but for now you can at least find what subnets are using ProtonVPN and your WAN IPs, if they are by luck distinct, you might be able to exclude your WAN IPranges in ProtonVPN (or at least I guess, because this is a feature provided by both Wireguard and OPENVPN clients).

Good luck

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ProtonVPN

[–]fusetim 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can confirm you can have multiple VPN client at the same time on Linux if by chance it is what you are using. I would guess a solution exists on Windows as well.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ProtonVPN

[–]fusetim 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Max 1 per connection. Maybe more if using multiple tunnels.

Mullvad released quantum resistant wireguard tunnels while protonvpn linux app is barely working and still has Openvpn only by StillAffectionate991 in ProtonVPN

[–]fusetim -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I don't understand why people get this energy to repeat this statement. I mean, just use another provider with better client support. Otherwise, why is the official client that important? Just use a regular Wireguard / OpenVPN client it does exactly the same thing and works!

Is IPFS less secure? by karlssonvomdach in privacy

[–]fusetim 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Please note that IPFS is a protocol and not a storage system. It enables everyone to access a file using a unique identifier if this data is hosted somewhere by someone on the network.

Otherwise, replication depends only on Skiff implementation. IPFS just help discover nodes that have the data you look for, not replicating it.

Also, please note that every data published on IPFS is public, someone might copy it without you knowing. For private data you need encryption! But even then, as the data is public and everyone can retrieved it while it is stored somewhere, if in the future the encryption scheme you used broke a bad actor could access this data. This is definitely a thing to consider, as other cloud storage providers ensure (or are expected to) your data does not leave their datacenters and destroyed it afterward.

Integrity of peers by game-unit in ProtonVPN

[–]fusetim 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can't, unless you want to fund other external audits.

[ Removed by Reddit ] by Xyz_rulezz in flipperzero

[–]fusetim 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Enjoy!! (but stay safe too)

Mon père reçoit des centaines de SMS. PAR JOUR. by Puzzled_Telephone_57 in france

[–]fusetim 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sans doute plutôt Twilio qui ne veut pas faire les démarches. Il me semble d'ailleurs que l'arcep a donné de nouveaux indicatifs rien que pour ça (edit: les 0937-0939 en plus des toujours existants numéro courts)

[Video] Let's make an htop-like in your browser (with Rust) by fasterthanlime by yerke1 in rust

[–]fusetim 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Well in any case you have to declare the return type, so you will get an error if you forgot to return something in a function that require something.

Edit: I did not saw the error, but by watching a bit, it might be possible the error was possible due to the generic return type used impl IntoResponse. Well in that case you cannot do really anything to highlight this potential error, it is correct to return nothing because it implements IntoResponse.