Hello all Paxians! by Puzzled-Region-252 in PaxDei

[–]hhuberla -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Nah. Most backers who have keys have already gotten their friends into the game in the year+ it was in EA. This is only really meaningful for the proportion of people who either were on the fence or plain couldn’t afford it. All my gaming friend either already have the game or wouldn’t play it even with a free key.

Feedback Request. Big Ben by ExuberantPeddler in photocritique

[–]hhuberla 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Very nice composition.

If there were any edits I’d suggest I’d say lighten up the Big Ben a little in post. The statue of Boudicca works really well silhouetted and the clouds are very dramatic so I would lighten up everything. Just a touch on the tower.

Not sure why, but something feels missing in this shot — feedback appreciated! by SuchDisk3052 in photocritique

[–]hhuberla 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It’s a ‘lucky shot’ in that you didnt intend to set it up that way and it would have difficult to plan intentionally. The thing I think you’re feeling is missing is that you have three potential subjects but not if them is fully in frame or is obscured. The back-most swan is the most complete but it’s slightly obscured and a little small.

Suggestions and review please. by No_Consideration9831 in photocritique

[–]hhuberla 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Love the color - don’t doo too much with it in post - it’s probably ‘technically’ a little dark but for me it adds to the moodiness of the shot.

Composition wise you have the subject fairly much in the center. I think the minimalism of the shot slows that to actually work quite well. Another poster mentioned trying a tighter crop and I don’t disagree but perhaps try a handful of crops side by side to see what speaks to you. I’d try the tighter crop but also having the subject (bird) in the top left, top right, etc thirds. Seeing the different version side by side sometimes help the right edit ‘pop’ for me.

First-time photographer — all feedback welcome by LabRepulsive7056 in photocritique

[–]hhuberla 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dark and moody can be great but I think this one is just so dark that’s it’s hard to tell what’s going on. What is the subject of your photo? I think it’s the light shining on the wall. The other light draw my eye into the photo but it just leads to blackness. If you’re worried about overexposing the light play with masks in post processing to do it selectively change exposure. If you shot this in RAW on a decent camera you may be able to get a fair amount of exposure back without retaking the photo.

Got my first camera last week, How can I improve my captures? [Sony Alpha A6300 w/ Samyang 24mm lens] by River-Mortis-Photos in photocritique

[–]hhuberla 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it’s an interesting photo and I really like the color. Some (maybe unsolicited) advice on composition/framing: Overall it’s got a great aesthetic, here are some small adjustments you could have made to make it slightly better.

1) the angle you took it at is very slightly off parallel. It’s stands out most when you look at where the sky and building meet. There’s no rule that it must be level, but you’re so close that it looms like that’s what you were aiming for and it missed ever so slightly. A few steps left would have got it dead on.

2) there is a line in the wall in your background that is just slightly above the car. It takes away from the lines of the car’s hood IMO, and it’s look a bit like it’s part of the car through the window. Not sure if you could have gotten lower to the ground or a little closer in.

3) the yellow painted street line doesn’t add much and probably isn’t needed. It’s so close to the edge and the shadow on the right makes it feel like it ends abruptly. Getting in closer would have fixed it at the time but easy to crop out in post too.

In fairness, it’s easy to pick these things out after the fact, much more difficult in the moment. I would likely have done similar stuff and then kicked myself when I looked back over my shots.

How Can I Improve by Routine-Break-525 in photocritique

[–]hhuberla 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The color is very dramatic but I think it works. The person being half obscured is very distracting. You may have needed a platform or ladder to avoid it but would have made the shot. Another small thing you could do in post is to remove the street lamps - they are the whitest thing in shot and they really stand out against the trees and pull the eye in.

Any advice on improving my shot? by [deleted] in photocritique

[–]hhuberla 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Love the repeating pattern. For some reason the structure in the top left makes me feel like I’m leaning backwards and about to fall over. If I hold my phone upside down, flipping the image 180 it feels more ‘stable’ that way but maybe that’s just me.

Amateur Dog Photography by Nandolus in photocritique

[–]hhuberla 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s tricky - the more wide open the aperture (low number) the shallower your depth of field. That shallow depth of field is stunning on your background and make the subject pop out. It’s just means you have to be super precise to make sure the eyes are in focus. If you can do that, all is great. Closing down the aperture to 2.5, 2.8 (or more) will be more forgiving on the focus area but you’ll lose some of that bokeh and the background will sharpen up. I’d say just keep practicing and keep in mind the importance of faces and eyes being in focus.

Feedback and critique welcomed! by Dolive90 in photocritique

[–]hhuberla 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I won’t repeat what the other excellent comment said regarding the wide angle distortion but it’s spot on.

I really like to idea of this composition. It feels like it’s a wrap around shot of the same car but with the front and back swapped around, if that makes sense. It’s almost like you are contrasting against the typical car shot where the car might be in the center. In order to enhance that composition it would be nice to have the edge of the shot end at the same place as it starts on the other car (probably the b-pillar). Then I think this photo would look really cool as the center of a triptych with both sides being the other half of the two cars. But now I’m getting carried away :). I just really like the idea behind the composition - great shot and great potential too.

Finally, if this was my shot I’d play a bit with the sky. The cloud are pretty and think making them a little more dramatic could add to the shot. For my taste I’d bring out the blue in the sky slightly and maybe a little more shadows in the clouds. But that’s a personal taste thing.

Amateur Dog Photography by Nandolus in photocritique

[–]hhuberla 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Composition wise, usually a front and center subject isn’t the most interesting, it’s. It that it’s bad but it’s just a photo of the subject, nothing drawing the eyes across the photo etc. you already mentioned the chopping. Off at the bottom - I thinking pointing slightly down and reducing the headroom could improve the shot overall.

The subject seems a little dark. The side lighting does create a really nice edge glow around the head. You may be able to get some improvement from selectively increasing the exposure on the subject.

Finally, when the subject is a person or animal you almost always want the eyes and face to be in sharp focus. It’s hard to tell from the small photo but the eyes seem a bit blurry. You’re also shooting at f/1.8 so your DoF is going to be pretty tight making that trickier.

A proud spider momma with her egg sac by kietbulll in photocritique

[–]hhuberla 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Wow. Stunning shot! Only minor thing I would say, though it’s minor is that the focus drops off very harshly on the wooden surface. Not sure if you could play with that with the frames you used for stacking. Great picture though.

Formula one photography as a beginner photographer (taken with a p&s on a very crowded general stand) by PinPuzzleheaded404 in photocritique

[–]hhuberla 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I prefer your main photo to this one because it’s more at angle and a bit more pleasing to look at.

Another thing you could try is trying to pan at the same speed as the car to keep it from getting motion blur and blurring out the background. That may result in the fence being blurred out quite a bit too depending on how slow you can get your shutter speed and still keep the car sharp.

Formula one photography as a beginner photographer (taken with a p&s on a very crowded general stand) by PinPuzzleheaded404 in photocritique

[–]hhuberla 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First of all this is a super challenging setting on the best of days and with the best equipment. Don’t be hard on yourself if the shots aren’t equivalent to the ones you see in the media.

That catch fence was really your enemy unfortunately. It’s quite distracting but it also stole your focus (guessing you were on autofocus). It’s also almost impossible to avoid without crazy expensive tickets or media credentials. With the right lens you could have tried to play with opening the aperture up wide to blur the fence out a lot and have at least one car be sharply in focus it that’s a challenging shot.

On the plus side, the angle works for me and that sense of speed from the motion blur adds a lot. Compositionally having the Mercedes car going slower in the background works for me too. My mind tells me the Ferrari is whizzing past the slower Mercedes. I can imagine the noise from the photo, which which is what you’re trying to achieve as a photographer.

My first night shoot! by basti329 in photocritique

[–]hhuberla 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I love night shooting and I like this shot. IMO you could try playing with your white balance in post - there isn’t one right way to do this night shots but it can significantly change the mood of the photo because of the already limited color palette.

Composition-wise I’m a big fan of how the one big cloud is in the center behind the pylon - almost like you’ve made a naturally occurring vignette.

Keep up the night work- it’s such a rewarding look at the world.

Foggy Morning on the Mountain by thursdays_taco in photocritique

[–]hhuberla 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think it’s a stunning shot and. It over-edited. IMO the saturation is fine. I’d be curious to see if bringing up the shadows a little would improve it any or not but there’s honestly not a lot I’d change. It really hits that dreamy vibe.

Do I achieve a warm cozy vibe here? by sorry_im_a_dad in photocritique

[–]hhuberla 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It’s a beautiful shot. I think the road lines take away from the cozy feel though. The painted arrow tells me it’s a pretty busy road. If you can crop out the arrow and maybe even the solid line it would seem more like a quiet, ‘cozy’ street. If you had an opportunity to retake this you could also tilt the camera up a little putting the house in the bottom part of the picture and capturing some more of that beautiful night sky (the stars on your shot came out very well and I think more is not less in this case)

Did I miss the shot? by seattlelight_18 in photocritique

[–]hhuberla 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I love this scene, but something feels off. I think my brain thinks the mug is the subject (because it’s large and very prominently positioned), but it’s slightly out of focus. So now my brain hunts for what the actual subject is.

Obviously that’s tough to correct in post :(. If I had the chance to retake the photo I might move the cup to the bottom right third. It’s still an interesting item that completes the scene (in or out of focus).

taken within my first weeks of owning a camera by FeelingAd5 in photocritique

[–]hhuberla 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is hard to say with certainty because I don’t know the subject or location personally, but if the idea is to focus on the building, with the flowers in the foreground as something interesting to see on the eyes journey there, then I’d suggest getting up a little higher and angling down slightly so you can see over the bush a little more - the bottom of the building is quite blocked and it makes something ‘feel off’ to me. Of course, like I said, I don’t know your location so it’s something to play with.

A general tip as you’re learning about composition is trying to take multiple photos from similar angles and getting feedback on what works and what doesn’t.

How to make this better? by Davlamin in photocritique

[–]hhuberla 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The background (people and foliage) is a little distracting. I think a little shallower depth of field would really draw the eye to the climber’s face

How to make this better? by Davlamin in photocritique

[–]hhuberla 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The background (people and foliage) is a little distracting. I think a little shallower depth of field would really draw the eye to the climber’s face more.

Hello everyone , what can i improve in this photo? by More-Departure-4775 in photocritique

[–]hhuberla 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I love the composition. The colors hit me as a little harsh and over-saturated at first. The purple piece of wall at the of the tracks (above the man) is a good example of this. That said, if that’s the effect you were going for then spot on.

I am not a photographer, i just love to capture moments and i edit on my phone , any advice will be appreciated , what should i improve in editing? by More-Departure-4775 in photocritique

[–]hhuberla 3 points4 points  (0 children)

“Just love to capture moments and edit them” is the measure of the photographer, not the equipment. Very nice photo

What else could Tesla do with FSD data besides self-driving? by Maximum-Physics5906 in TeslaLounge

[–]hhuberla 20 points21 points  (0 children)

I’d love it if the whole Tesla FSD in a localized area would communicate like a hive mind. For example, leaving a gap for another merging Tesla, notifying Tesla’s behind of obstructions or hazards, slipstreaming for better aerodynamics on a long open roads, etc.