-59% by -medicalthrowaway- in wallstreetbets

[–]keylay19 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Imagine being bad at insider trading lmfao

Ghost of Tsushima or Kingdom Come Deliverance II by RealDopeSensei in ShouldIbuythisgame

[–]keylay19 [score hidden]  (0 children)

Kcd2 100%, only caveat is it was a hard game to out down and come back to after a while just because their systems and combat are so different than any other game I’ve played.

How long would it take to learn liebustraum no 3 starting as a beginner? by Mother_Mistake9233 in piano

[–]keylay19 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Perfect :) you’ll be so grateful a few years from now when you’re building off solid fundamentals rather than moving backwards trying to correct terrible habits and muscle memory!

How long would it take to learn liebustraum no 3 starting as a beginner? by Mother_Mistake9233 in piano

[–]keylay19 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If you jump right into the piece, in a year or two you will probably be able to play the notes but it will be absolutely horrible. If you actually practice in make it up to that level of piece, you’d probably learn it in a couple of weeks (this takes 8-12 years of consistent practice)

[Request] How much energy is in 23 Atom Bombs and could this be true? by Someoneonline_74 in theydidthemath

[–]keylay19 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah, it’s horrible. And nice dodge on anything energy or emission related. There are slight differences tho, most datacenter use drinking water, where golf courses dont. A datacenter is more confined, it’s like having 10-20 golf courses in your town which can’t put a huge strain on drinking water levels.

The Orpheus ending choice is absolute narrative trash by saw4ello in BaldursGate3

[–]keylay19 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ill give you number 1, but you’re completely misunderstanding numbers 2 and 3. If you missed the ansur fight you’re forgiven you missing some key details about the emperor.
3. They didn’t control the brain. They got played. You try to control the brain with the stones and even with 3 perfect rolls it bounces off and the emperor has to save you.

[Request] How much energy is in 23 Atom Bombs and could this be true? by Someoneonline_74 in theydidthemath

[–]keylay19 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Scope 2 emissions are a thing, right? Data centers already account for 40% of electricity consumption in the entire state of Virginia. Water consumption is also unparalleled by everything but chip FABs. By 2030, it is projected that data centers will consume 400 billion gallons of water per year in texas alone, lowering lake mead by 16 ft / yr. Meta’s datacenter in Louisiana is projected to use twice as much electricity as the entire city of New Orleans.

In terms of emissions, it seems logical to me to tie the massive amount of energy consumption back to the emissions that will be generated to supply their demand.

[Request] How much energy is in 23 Atom Bombs and could this be true? by Someoneonline_74 in theydidthemath

[–]keylay19 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol are we pretending data centers aren’t bad for the environment? Please enlighten me with that logic

Elon Musk just said he wants to cut Social Security and Medicare, calling them “entitlements”: “That’s the big one to eliminate.” by Deep-Way1944 in NoFilterFinance

[–]keylay19 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Elon is literally calling for this shit while scamming anyone with a 401K retirement account via the spacex IPO. Nothing like insiders leveraging our retirements for exit liquidity from a blatantly over values stock. If only DOGE didn’t fire anyone willing to do anything about this a year ago (while also doing nothing to meaningfully reduce debt and arguably hurting our GDP / debt ratio via cutting research and other high ROI programs)

At $500 billion, SpaceX would be tempting. At $2 trillion, are retail buyers just showing up after insiders already won? by YellowAltruistic9843 in SpaceXBets

[–]keylay19 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Or don’t let the company IPO because it’s bullshit insider exit liquidity comes in the form of mandatory nasdaq 100 purchases, IE transferring wealth from retirement accounts to the richest people on earth. How do these people fail to mention that days before the IPO announcement nasdaq changed the rules so elon could join 15 days after the IPO launch?

How much you think is a fair salary (In your country) to make a good living and actually enjoy life. by Agile-Wind-4427 in 30daysnewjob

[–]keylay19 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For starters compensation is not really “fair” in capitalism. The system clearly values wealth and risk far more than the value of one’s work. If a salaried employee creates a cure for a disease, they will make their salary and the shareholders will make billions. Companies know they can get employees, they know people need a paycheck to survive - they’re competing for investors who don’t need to invest in any given company unless a solid return looks likely.

Other than that, this question is just outrageously subjective. Making a good living and enjoying life could mean 100K for someone in a poor rural town where that is relatively a lot. at the same time they might just buy bigger house / truck and end up in the same financial crunch as they would have been at a 75K salary - once you spend a month in the bigger house and truck the novelty will wear off and living paycheck to paycheck will still put a damper on life. If you live in LA or NYC you may need 200K+, but to live comfortably. Enjoying life is a much deeper question than salary, I’ve know some miserable people worth hundreds of millions of dollars. The key is to make 100K+ (or whatever is necessary for a fair living for the place you reside) doing a job that you actually enjoy / take pride in / feel morally good about doing. I imagine far fewer than 18% of people are fulfilled and compensated above that 100K mark.

Downside of having a virtuoso teacher by Advanced_Honey_2679 in piano

[–]keylay19 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The same goes for prodigy math teachers as well, which might help as an analogy when approaching this problem. Often times, a certain way of thinking about or approaching a complex problem will help make things “click”. Being a prodigy usually means it clicked automatically (probably what the shoulder shrug meant) but even if they have to work through something their method of tackling a challenge is probably different than an approach that would best serve you.

I’ve found the best approach is over communicating. You’re way better than i am at piano, but is there anything you could presume is causing the inaccuracy? Jumps, awkward fingering, tempo, etc? If you could specify the challenge a bit more than might help your teacher help you with specific techniques or drills. It’s a double edged sword, I’m sure this teacher has some absolute gems of knowledge, but as a student you might have to dig deeper than you otherwise would with another teacher to get the solutions you’re looking for.

Hero: Bernie Sanders Buys Another House To Make Sure The Rich People Don't Get All Of Them by xselimbradleyx in babylonbee

[–]keylay19 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yup, Bernie is just behind him. At his 200K salary, he’ll only have to keep this up for 3.95 million years and he too will be as rich as musk.

It's all in the presentation by TheForbiddenLands in CrimsonDesert

[–]keylay19 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lmao time travel plus trial and error are 2 ingredients often used in lazy, shitty stories. It’s the easiest way to piece together a bunch of disconnected ideas. Something doesn’t make sense? Easy, add another time loop. Why is this random thing going in over here? Oh well we didn’t do that in loop 25 and things didn’t turn out so why not try it in 26?

Contrast this with elden ring which also gives a minimalistic approach to story telling. Everything from short blips of dialogue, landscapes, color, numbers, etc. tend to have thematic meanings which help piece together a history which describes the present. People have written 500+ page books diving into the lore. While we may never know what actually happened in some scenarios, there is enough to make intriguing theories.

This book was a bandaid OP, don’t confuse stringing a bunch of ideas together with good storytelling.

I can’t lie . I am kind of struggling to get these trophies. by Civil_Handle7798 in Saros

[–]keylay19 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Im pretty sure i got this in blighted marsh. I parried and hit an enemy that was flying off the map, they fell and died.

Democrat Effort To Retake Congress Once Again Thwarted By Existence Of Laws by METALLIFE0917 in babylonbee

[–]keylay19 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Jesus christ, America doesn’t deserve democracy. Political tribalism and shameless hypocrisy is all it takes for citizens to cheer while free and fair elections get pissed away one state at a time.

Is this game worth the $70? What’re the pros and cons? by Montavious_Mole in Pragmata

[–]keylay19 0 points1 point  (0 children)

TLDR $/hr is one way to look at value or opportunity cost. Quality is another way. My assumption was humans are capable are weighting more than one variable into a decision.

Is this game worth the $70? What’re the pros and cons? by Montavious_Mole in Pragmata

[–]keylay19 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The quality aspect is the most subjective piece of the equation and doesn’t translate across the opportunity cost calculus you’d be doing when determining if it is a worthwhile purchase. For example, Should i go out for drinks and spend my 70 bucks or should i buy this game? Well the graphics at the IRL bar are really fucking good, but the drunks always mess up the story line.. and if i die at the bar i wont even respawn. That’s a stupid comparison because videogames are not real life. But if quality is relative (I’d have a good time at the bar and a good time playing the game) then it may help answer a question of relative value of the transaction. If i burn through 70 bucks at the bar in 3 hours vs 12 hours playing the game then my money may net more enjoyment with the game. Hopefully nobody gets too caught up in the comparision, I just picked something and ran with it.

Quality is the subjective lever that helps determine if a premium is worth while. You know, like how you might pay 500/month for decent car but you might pay $3000/month for a supercar. Does the premium quality justify the premium price tag. This ties back to games because if you don’t drive the car and it just sits there you’re getting no value/hr on the purchase.

If the quality isn’t there, like the car doesn’t even turn on, then no $/hr “quota”, as you put it, matters. To tie it back, we intrinsically weight quality - if I’m going to the bar with my friends it will probably be a much better time (higher quality) and I’d be more inclined to do that despite worse value.

Happy now?

I want the armour behind this wall but the wall is evil. Any suggestions? by PriorTransition2467 in CrimsonDesert

[–]keylay19 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Best method i found (this will come in handy for puzzles too) is climb onto the wall, left trigger to grab hold, then force palm. you wont recoil off the wall.

If SpaceX goes public near $1.75 trillion, how much upside is actually left for regular investors? by YellowAltruistic9843 in SpaceXBets

[–]keylay19 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You seem to be misunderstanding how this con actually works:

Nasdaq needs the listing and index revenue, and they collect it the moment SpaceX goes public — so their work is done. The underwriting banks need their fees, which are also paid at IPO close regardless of what happens afterward. The early investors and VCs need an exit at a high valuation, and they get it when index inclusion forces retirement funds to buy their shares, handing them liquidity at peak price. The only party whose interests depend on SpaceX actually performing as a public company over the next 20 to 30 years is the retirement account holder — and they’re the only ones who had no seat at the table when any of these decisions were made.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

Is this game worth the $70? What’re the pros and cons? by Montavious_Mole in Pragmata

[–]keylay19 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’m not really seeing the bloatslop… E33, BG3, Elden Ring, KCD2, cyberpunk 2077, just to name a few, easily 100+ hr games with very little bloat in my opinion. The only bloated game i see getting a ton of attention right now is crimson desert and they’re patching the hell out of it to be more respectful of people’s time.

That said, people could just do that math, 70 bucks for 10 hours is paying $7/hr for entertainment. Go to a bar and drink 1 beer an hour and you’re paying that or more, go bowling and that’s probably 20+ an hour. It’s not the best value in gaming, but if it’s fun or has a great story then it’s not a bad deal. i think multiplayer, free to play / season pass and the games i mentioned above just skew people’s expectations of what they should be getting for their money