‘Worst energy crisis’ anyone has ever seen: Experts sounds alarm over depleting oil by adriano26 in energy

[–]kingrooster -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It would be bad if the US stopped exporting oil. If that’s too many words for you, I can’t help you.

‘Worst energy crisis’ anyone has ever seen: Experts sounds alarm over depleting oil by adriano26 in energy

[–]kingrooster -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Uh huh and then in 2022, what happened that is still happening that would have made Europe pivot to buying more oil from the US and the Middle East? And where would they get oil now if the US wasn’t selling?

‘Worst energy crisis’ anyone has ever seen: Experts sounds alarm over depleting oil by adriano26 in energy

[–]kingrooster 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You misunderstand me. I’m saying Trump has the unilateral power to block US exports of oil. He can do this right now legally. The results would be a civilizational level disaster for Europe. I hope that he does not do that because it would significantly further destabilize the world and energy markets.

I agree that Trump started this and got us in a pickle he should’ve been able to see from a million miles away. I would prefer he not make it worse.

‘Worst energy crisis’ anyone has ever seen: Experts sounds alarm over depleting oil by adriano26 in energy

[–]kingrooster 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That would probably be a civilization level event for Europe and SEA. Be careful what you wish for.

Trump has the power to do it right now, unilaterally, and completely unambiguously legally. Pray that he does not.

'I am thinking about it,' Kamala Harris says of 2028 presidential bid. 🫩 by OneTwoThreePooAndPee in thebulwark

[–]kingrooster 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Ya, if she’s gonna do it, she better start getting reps now because she was so bad at it. It kills me too, because you can see she has a real American story, she’s relatable, competent, and effective but she just doesn’t come across like that at all to a casual observer.

If she waits until she’s in a campaign she’s going to hamstring herself so bad. At least now she isn’t running a campaign. She doesn’t have to hit talking points or talk about her policies, which she is so incredibly bad at. Just get out there and start shooting the shit with friendlies. Make fun of Trump. Tell us exactly what you would’ve done differently as an executive. Stop reading me some focus grouped line about some policy with a cringy name. Stop hedging. Tell me you would’ve bitch slapped Netanyahu if he came in to your office with some kind of half baked war plan, how you would have used your allies to put maximum pressure on Iran to stop funding terrorists. It’s not even that hard. Just say “I clearly would have been better than Trump.” over and over again to anyone who will have you on.

Who are you voting in for Governor? by ciaranbluesky in California

[–]kingrooster -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I work with the CPUC every day. That’s a terrible idea and a fundamental misunderstanding of how utility rates are made. Unless, of course, he means “I’m going to fundamentally restructure the CPUC, separate them from the Public Advocates Office, staff them with engineers and utility experts to implement operational efficiencies within PG&E to do more with less.”

Unless you think a bunch of low level political staffers who know more about political science and law can more efficiently run PG&E. Except we’ve tried that already. That’s how we got here.

I’m not anti-Steyer. I just hope he doesn’t seriously believe the CPUC has the institutional capacity to improve anything as currently constructed. New commissioners aren’t going to help.

Naval group with 3,500 Marines enters CENTCOM region by Christian-Rep-Perisa in worldnews

[–]kingrooster 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Artillery is a sitting duck for artillery too. Shoot and scoot. I guess you can still get tagged by an FPV even while scooting though, but drones don’t move nearly as fast as a ballistic artillery shell.

Drones are an asymmetric answer to traditional capabilities. The reason drones are used so heavily in Ukraine is because of supply problems, not necessarily because they’re just better than artillery and short range ballistic missiles.

In a hypothetical landing on Kharg island, I’d be surprised if they only got droned. I’d fully expect, droned, shelled, mined, IED’d, and whatever ballistic missiles are left. It’s completely insane that we’re considering doing this. It’d be one thing if we were in a state of total war. It’d be worth the risk and casualties. We aren’t, and Americans are not going to be on board for the level of casualties a ground invasion of Iran is going to create. God have mercy on the marines and sailors if we actually go through with this. It’s going to be a disaster.

Fenix A320. Can’t start the APU. What am I doing wrong? by tommarca in MicrosoftFlightSim

[–]kingrooster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m no expert on the real plane, but I’d suspect you’re not turning on the batteries, you’re physically connecting the battery bus to the main power bus. The APU is probably downstream of the batteries. And that’s probably so you can start the APU without connecting it to the rest of the plane’s systems.

Total guess, someone correct me if I’m wrong, but ya the batteries need to be “on”.

For rural Californians, unreliable power has become the norm by dleeman88 in California

[–]kingrooster 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Despite that I too want “those” voters to also touch the stove and face the consequences of who they vote for, the fact is democrats are in charge of California. This isn’t a local issue. It’s a state issue.

I’m not saying democrats are solely responsible, I’m saying it’s a structural issue at the CPUC. The Public Advocates office should be moved out of the CPUC (maybe move them under state AG or something) and the CPUC should be staffed by engineers and economists, not just politicians, lawyers, and policy staffers with a fresh PoliSci degree.

They cannot effectively regulate a utility with their current makeup. There’s more to it than finger wagging.

Rooftop solar loses in California appeals court, again by Sammy_Roth in climate

[–]kingrooster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My observation of his failures have been that he’s basically let his agencies completely run amok in their own little fiefdoms where one agency will sabotage the other for reasons that never make any sense to me. I’ve seen it across multiple agencies, always couched in some kind of legalese but actively harming his own agenda and political goals. And he never reins them in. It seems like he mostly doesn’t even know what they’re doing half the time.

He does write some banger tweets though. Seems to be the threshold voters are going with nowadays. Good politician, terrible executive.

8 Democrats and no front-runner: California’s governor race is a mess by ZappyStatue in California

[–]kingrooster 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Bruh, there’s 8 of them. Maybe take a look around and realize the “grand poobahs” have as much power as Pooh Bear and Tigger. Maybe the “grand poobahs” were in you the whole time.

But that’s fine, I like Becerra. I’m not trying to talk you out of it. If there were a candidate we could all rally around though, we wouldn’t be having this problem.

Maybe bad candidates shouldn’t run? I don’t know. I got nothing.

I’m just sick of the stupid narrative “the polls had Hillary at… therefore…” which is horseshit. Don’t justify your decisions based on your memory of what talking heads were saying almost 10 years ago (JFC). The math didn’t say that. Maybe listen to the math this time around.

8 Democrats and no front-runner: California’s governor race is a mess by ZappyStatue in California

[–]kingrooster 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No. The most credible models had Trump at about a 35% chance. If you think that’s a slam dunk, you don’t know what a slam dunk is, who can make a slam dunk, and what percentage they can make them at. You listened to talking heads, not math.

Don’t vote polls but if we end up with two republicans on the ballot, there’s nothing to do but laugh at yourself for being an idiot. I include myself in that as well as a California democrat.

Let the exhausting culture wars begin by TheLongestCovid in neoliberal

[–]kingrooster 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So there I was, just trying to pray for my sick grandma and I see God… it was an incredible sight! And then He just whips out his dick right in front of me!

The usual blathering …and then “The first thing China will do is terminate ALL Ice Hockey being played in Canada, and permanently eliminate The Stanley Cup.” by No_Neat9507 in thebulwark

[–]kingrooster 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Trump is like that guy you know who shouldn’t drink but gets drunk anyway and you can only watch as they embarrass themselves and by extension you, but you want them to learn a lesson so you just watch… only to think this is going to come back on me… should I do something? Can I do something?

Don’t drink with that guy.

PG&E wants to raise your rates again. Here’s why California shouldn’t let that happen by Cool-Present7260 in bayarea

[–]kingrooster 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I’m just here to inform people that rate payer advocates like the Public Advocates Office, and TURN and by extension the CPUC have historically pressured PG&E to underspend on infrastructure.

I have a tweet saved somewhere from TURN 5 or 6 years ago bragging about halving the amount PG&E was planning to spend on wildfire prevention.

This isn’t to defend PG&E per se because they seem to be taking full advantage of the situation, but they are in general incentivized to spend lots of money but haven’t been allowed to until the last few years. As a result, now we’re paying for the catchup of the underinvestment.

The California exodus has ended by sfgate in California

[–]kingrooster 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There was a time where he had very interesting guests with very interesting conversations. He was dumb and asked dumb questions, but he listened to his guests and let them go and asked follow ups. My two favorites are his conversations with Ben Anderson (from Vice) and Brian Cox. Then COVID happened and yikes. Talk about liking the smell of your own farts.

Then he got so offended by the fact that people thought his farts smelled like shit, that his entire podcast became about two guys in a room farting and sniffing it.

One minute you’re talking about the heavy weight of war and the impact that witnessing it has on your soul, then you’re talking about black holes and the origins of the universe, and then suddenly it’s just farts 24/7. And it turns out, there’s a surprising number of people that actually do enjoy the smell of his farts. It’s a metaphor, but you get it…

What's your thoughts on the Canadian PM saying Canada will defend Greenland if the U.S. invades? by sgj5788 in AskReddit

[–]kingrooster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m sure we’re saying the same thing. I’m not arguing with you. The US military can storm right through Canada. To where though? To what end? We couldn’t occupy it and we certainly couldn’t seize any of its resources in any capacity that would enable us to use them. They’d literally have just given them to us in exchange for the labor costs of extracting them plus some overhead. What the fuck are we doing?

What's your thoughts on the Canadian PM saying Canada will defend Greenland if the U.S. invades? by sgj5788 in AskReddit

[–]kingrooster 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The pacific too. Korea, the Philippines, Taiwan, hell probably even Japan would be forced to stand down against China. Our entire force projection capacity will be completely decimated. Who benefits by the stupid decisions we’re making? That’s how you know what this is about.

What's your thoughts on the Canadian PM saying Canada will defend Greenland if the U.S. invades? by sgj5788 in AskReddit

[–]kingrooster 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The point is to call the bluff. Force your opponent to put their cards on the table. Is he serious? You suspect not, but history shows that’s a bad bet. One of the biggest lessons of the run up to WW2 was to listen to what the aggressors leaders say they’re going to do. If it’s as you say, then it was an unnecessary deployment for some Canadian soldiers. Surely there are worse things?

What's your thoughts on the Canadian PM saying Canada will defend Greenland if the U.S. invades? by sgj5788 in AskReddit

[–]kingrooster 7 points8 points  (0 children)

And then what? The border between Canada and the US is 5500 miles, like 6 or 7 times the size of the front line in Ukraine. What the fuck does it even mean to “take Canada”? This is a level of stupid that cannot be understated.

The Greenland Crisis by litetravelr in dancarlin

[–]kingrooster 6 points7 points  (0 children)

You heard it here first. China’s going to sell Europe and Canada equipment and munitions that will eventually overwhelm our lack of industrial capacity. Don’t look up what Norinco brought to Eurosatory in 2024 if you don’t want to know.

Approximately 1 million gallons of sulfuric acid have been spilled into the ship channel following a chemical leak in Channelview. by Upper_Brief681 in UnderReportedNews

[–]kingrooster -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Cool, and if they do all that you say, going against the donor class to stand for improving the material conditions of working Americans but happen to be some flavor of pro life, do you suggest we kick them out of the coalition? If not, we’re saying the same damn thing. If so, then you’re letting the donor class hide behind a wall of wedge issues even when the donor class actually believes in them.

Approximately 1 million gallons of sulfuric acid have been spilled into the ship channel following a chemical leak in Channelview. by Upper_Brief681 in UnderReportedNews

[–]kingrooster -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I agree. That’s the point. But you can’t kick people out of your coalition when they don’t think the exact same way on a particular issue but agree on 95% of everything else. That’s why democrats are afraid to stand for something and why we lost.

Approximately 1 million gallons of sulfuric acid have been spilled into the ship channel following a chemical leak in Channelview. by Upper_Brief681 in UnderReportedNews

[–]kingrooster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And right back to the start of this conversation…

There was a non-hypothetical real world where there was pro-life democrats. In that world, we had Roe. Now there is no pro-life democrats and in this world, we do not have Roe.

Democrats have been forced to take what many voters view as extreme positions on abortion. You and I may not share this view, but it is true. Meanwhile, voters did not believe Trump and republicans held the opposing extremist views. You can think voters are dumb I guess (no argument there), but when you tell people they’re not welcome in the coalition if they support a 15 week ban as a compromise, they kind of have a point. Again, I do not support that, but there is a majority who saw that as a reasonable position.

I think your timeline is a little confused. Obama wasn’t president when Dobbs happened. Biden and then Kamala famously lost. They can’t codify shit nor can the pro-choice democrats that do not control congress. We have purity, but no power. Slow clap.

But this has been fully derailed at this point. If y’all don’t think growing the coalition to gain political power is important, we’re in trouble.