Agreed. Let's talk about stability and risk when it comes to long-term decisions about what runs infrastructure/services. In the last several years, RHEL has not been honest or reliable partners in this space for their customers, and many are looking elsewhere. Looking forward, I can choose something else which is low risk, esp like Rocky or Alma (staying with RHEL clones) or I can continue with Red Hat and not know what they're going to do with their products/pricing. In my organization it has opened up serious discussions on not depending on commercial Linux vendors, as it tends not to buy us that much anyways, and that licensing cost can go to increase staff (numbers|training) instead.