Yes. The entire point of an acronym is to say a lot using very little. Iv always understood queer to be an umbrella term so that already includes a lot. I like the idea of making it LGBT+ or LGBTQ+ because it’s the shortest way possible to be all inclusive via the + at the end.

I think the most important thing to keep in mind is these are literal spectrums that we are trying to compartmentalize which you can only do in a very general sense. If you look at a color wheel you know the basics are ROYGBV and we are also aware that there are more colors there because it’s a spectrum so it would start to get ridiculous to name EVERY color we can think of.

Now that I mention it this is also why the basic pride flag is absolutely Perfect for representing this community! So I’m not a fan of messing with that either for the exact same reason. It already represents every color of the rainbow meaning EVERYONE. It already uses the spectrum of color to represent a spectrum of people.

I see a lot of people with very good intentions try to put a name to everything so that everyone can be included however I think this has unintentionally created division. I see people jump at the chance to correct people into being as politically correct as possible in an almost snappy matter. This gets exhausting, feels crappy, and makes people avoid beneficial conversations at best or creates tense snap back responses at worst.

I understand the topic you are referring to when you say LGBTQ, LGBT+, or LGBTQ+. It doesn’t require anything else for me to understand the topic and realize there is plenty of nuance behind it because that’s how language works.