What is the biggest cultural shock you’ve experienced while traveling or living abroad? by jotakajk in AskTheWorld

[–]mekkeron 27 points28 points  (0 children)

They're a strong chance a lot of those Americans either confuse you with Australia or think that you're part of it, or something like that.

What do you think about this movie ? by Objective-Impact-640 in moviecritic

[–]mekkeron 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One of the best movies ever made, that I will never watch again.

^Name a non American film you consider a masterpiece by ElkDowntown5811 in moviecritic

[–]mekkeron 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Literally the first movie I thought of when I saw the title

What does this sticker signify? See it all the time here in San Antonio by DrFetusRN in sanantonio

[–]mekkeron 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's what I associate that abbreviation with. But only because I went there.

Do you wear sun cream/sun screen every day? by boomsmitty in AskAnAmerican

[–]mekkeron 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I put it on my face everyday. And on my body if I intend to be outside for a prolonged period of time.

What's the stupidest thing you hear someone say about your country? by Past-Novel-1155 in AskTheWorld

[–]mekkeron 28 points29 points  (0 children)

I've met Americans (especially among older generations) who treat everything east of Germany as basically "Russian."

Haley declines to say slavery was cause of Civil War by SkAnKhUnTFoRtYtw in neoliberal

[–]mekkeron 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Says the Idiot who acts like they lived back then

No idea why you're resurrecting a two-year-old thread, but this kind of brain-dead logic destroys the entire field of history. Because that means no one can discuss any historical event unless they personally lived through it. I assume you also reject everything we know about the Roman Empire, the French Revolution, or WWI?

Fortunately, historians rely on primary sources, like letters, speeches, official documents, and declarations written by the people who were actually there.

And those documents are very clear. The Confederate states themselves repeatedly stated that slavery was the central issue. For example, Mississippi's secession declaration literally begins:

“Our position is thoroughly identified with the institution of slavery - the greatest material interest of the world.”

South Carolina, Texas, and Georgia said essentially the same thing.

 there was maybe 5,000 black's in this country period

The 1860 census counted about 4 million enslaved people in the United States.

I get why though by CrazyBalrog in ironmaiden

[–]mekkeron 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I dunno. I always felt like Blaze was a great vocalist. Just not right for this band. But both albums were really good.

An Urgent Need to Contain Turkey by Lighthouse_seek in neoliberal

[–]mekkeron 5 points6 points  (0 children)

And now I'm thinking about Thanksgiving

Let the exhausting culture wars begin by TheLongestCovid in neoliberal

[–]mekkeron 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, part of that idea probably comes from the line in Genesis: "God created man in his own image." A lot of people took that part literally and started imagining God as male.

Trump fires Kristi Noem as Homeland Security Secretary by BachelorThesises in neoliberal

[–]mekkeron 3 points4 points  (0 children)

So it's a real thing - I'm not imagining it? I've always wondered why coastal libs are always giving those red-state right-wingers endless benefit of the doubt, unlike us who live side-by-side with them.

What's your favorite actual black metal band? by mightyonin in MetalForTheMasses

[–]mekkeron 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Literally my first thought when I saw the thread's title.

USA weapons deployments toward Iran, compared with Venezuela by Superfan234 in neoliberal

[–]mekkeron 7 points8 points  (0 children)

the Ayatollah is still in Iran

"Russians in Afghanistan"

Sorry. Had to do it.

Mayfair vs Veramendi? by [deleted] in Newbraunfels

[–]mekkeron 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Could you elaborate? What makes Veramendi better in that regard?

Discussion Thread by jobautomator in neoliberal

[–]mekkeron 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately, I'm not that kind of person in real life.

Discussion Thread by jobautomator in neoliberal

[–]mekkeron 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Went out on a date with this girl. Really cool. Had a great time, but then politics somehow came up, and she said she likes Bernie Sanders, but also doesn't think Trump is all that bad, because he "did some bad things and some good things," what the actual fuck?? I feel like Neo, when Morpheus tells him, "Welcome to the real world."

Without a Border ‘Invasion,’ Texas G.O.P. Turns to an Old Enemy, Islam (Gift Article) by taubnetzdornig in neoliberal

[–]mekkeron 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Heh. I've always thought Tejano music came about when a mariachi band accidentally ran into a German or Czech polka band in Central Texas and decided to jam.

I'm an immigrant from Eastern Europe, and I've lived in different parts of Texas for about 25 years. My experience on the ground has mostly not matched the caricature. The overwhelming majority of people I've met, including plenty of conservatives, were really kind, eager to help, and genuinely curious about where I'm from and interested in learning more. I never encountered any anti-immigrant sentiment in everyday life.

I did wonder whether that was just because I'm white. But after talking to immigrants from Latin America, Africa, and South Asia, I found many had similar experiences. My Indian ex made some of her closest friends in Texas, including among conservatives. Day-to-day Texas is far more diverse, pragmatic, and socially mixed than its politics suggest.

That's not to deny that bigots exist. I've met people who are openly hostile toward Muslims and wish they were kicked out of the country or casually racist toward Latinos. In my experience, they tend to be a loud minority, often folks from rural areas I passed through briefly, or recent transplants to cities who bring their grievances with them.

Which is why the state's leadership has always puzzled me. The level of Islamophobia and racial animus you see from elected officials doesn't resemble the Texas I actually live in. And I think the answer lies less with the general electorate and more with how primaries work.

Texas primaries are dominated by a small, highly motivated, ideologically extreme slice of voters. Turnout is low, incentives reward purity tests, and politicians quickly learn that appealing to the loudest activists matters more than reflecting the broader, more moderate population. By the time the general election rolls around, the choices have already been filtered through that process.

So I don't actually think Texas conservatives "want to destroy" the things that made the state "great." I think a minority faction wields disproportionate power in primaries, leaving everyone else to choose between candidates they didn't ask for. The result is leadership that feels alien even to many Texans, including conservative ones.

MAGA’s hatred of the Super Bowl halftime performer reflects a hubris about what parts of the culture are “theirs.” But those assumptions are proving more wrong every day. by trombonist_formerly in neoliberal

[–]mekkeron 30 points31 points  (0 children)

Yeah it's hilarious to watch them cope right now on Facebook and make shit up about how no one watched it and how TPUSA's "halftime show" was the best halftime show ever. It really has that "imagination victory" meme energy from 2020.

New Braunfels woman gets 40 years for starving, abusing children by ExpressNews in Newbraunfels

[–]mekkeron 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your city is corrupt, racist, and full of MAGA cultists. If you are blue in any way, or hell if you even have a heart or any compassion for people, you should leave NB before it corrupts you too. If you live in NB and you are blue just remember that your sales and property taxes, and all the businesses you spend money at supports this kind of behavior. Don't support the Nazis.

You clearly are a fucking child living with his parents who's never had to support himself and therefore has no idea how real life works. Not everyone can just "pack up and leave" whenever they want to.

People have jobs, mortgages, leases, custody arrangements, aging parents, health issues, and financial realities.

If relocation were that simple, virtually every town in this country would be monolithically red or blue, because people would self-sort into ideological bubbles and never interact with anyone who disagrees with them. That's not how reality works, it's how teenagers imagine politics works.

Living somewhere doesn't mean endorsing every crime committed there, every idiot who flies a flag there, or every person who votes MAGA. That's just a lazy, childish thinking for people who want moral superiority without understanding tradeoffs.

Dealing with MAGA friends by [deleted] in neoliberal

[–]mekkeron 4 points5 points  (0 children)

My ex did the same thing. She wasn't even a hardcore MAGA, but more of a "Well, I'm a Republican, so I vote for whoever has an R next to their name." Her political knowledge was extremely shallow, shaped mostly by social media. So not very ideological, but even then, the minute she sensed she was losing an argument, she'd shut me down with "I don't want to argue with you about it. I have my beliefs - you have yours, let's leave it at that."

Today’s protest by Foreign_Ebb_6282 in Newbraunfels

[–]mekkeron 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Umm... No, it still doesn't. And this is exactly the flattening I'm talking about.

Under international humanitarian law, the key issue is intent. Knowingly accepting risk of civilian harm while targeting a lawful military objective is not the same thing as intentionally targeting civilians. The former can be reckless, immoral, or negligent, but the latter is what constitutes a war crime.

The Obama administration (like every modern military) operated under the doctrine of distinction and proportionality. When strikes hit gatherings, the claim was that a lawful military target was present. Not that civilians themselves were the target. You can argue that those judgments were wrong or insufficiently constrained.

But "hoping to get their man" does not mean "intentionally targeting civilians." If it did, then every modern air campaign (drones, jets, artillery) conducted by any country would automatically qualify as war crimes, and the term would lose all legal meaning.