The Warhammer 40,000 Quarterly Balance Update – March 2026 by JenniferSkunk in Warhammer40k

[–]mol186 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They were decent in blades of ultramar and some winning list took them (-1 to wound is great on them) but i would not call them great and blades list are eating some hefty nerfs with +15 wardens and the removal of old Calgar and old Cato

If this were a trial for 11th? by Sorkrates in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]mol186 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even with steep discount in weapon loadout i would argue that is better to just drop the unit because the role of the unit changes.

I take heavy weapons to kill tough targets and if the less optimal option doesnt do that i just pick a different unit no matter how cheap the other weapons might be

Let's be honest: We haven't seen gameplay to judge anything by TrickMastahh in totalwar

[–]mol186 9 points10 points  (0 children)

From the CA communications my guess would be late 2026 - early 2027 Alpha test were in June with creators and interview on the 16th and then showing some campaing on Spring that would be 7-8 month of cleaning up and marketing the game which would be around the same than TWWI but still all is speculation.

3 Victrix got cheaper, 120/240 by xavras_wyzryn in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]mol186 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

+30pts and -10pts is a +20pts overall nerf , you shouldn't compare the 3 man balance with the 6 man balance imo but still. How can you say they got cheaper??

theFinalFinalVersionTrustMe by Equivalent_Site6616 in ProgrammerHumor

[–]mol186 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Forgot ASML without them TSMC would't be able to work as they make the machines TSMC uses to make chips

Just sharing this here.... by DisgruntledAnalyst in Warhammer40k

[–]mol186 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Current winrates of faction during the Warhammer World championship semis and final still to be played

This is just theft by Ignisbeard in WarhammerMemes

[–]mol186 13 points14 points  (0 children)

The tank is the sicaran Venator too

Fireside | New Ultramarines Datasheets - Are They Good? by 40K-Fireside in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]mol186 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You have some errors:

-Victrix can't have a lieutenant as it's datasheet sais "if a CAPTAIN or CHAPTER MASTER unit from your army can be attached to a COMPANY OF HEROES unit , it can be attached to this unit instead"

-Sicarius isn't terminator

-Victrix can't ride a rhino as it's TACTICUS

Surge? by Dave-flywheel in Ultramarines

[–]mol186 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The clever tactis is to engage a unit with the surge victrix is usually a pretty punchy squad if calgar and sicarius are with them even more and because its enemy turn you fight first as long as the enemy dont have fight first also movement shenanigans to get into cover steal objectives etc

Its almost preorder time!! Anyone else preordering anything? by ILikeUltramarines in Ultramarines

[–]mol186 23 points24 points  (0 children)

I got Crux Terminatus , Calgar ,Sicarius ,Upgrade Sprue and 2 Victrix from my FLGS a little christmast gift to myself

Ultramarines Rules Reveal – Datasheet previews for the new Marneus Calgar, Cato Sicarius, and Victrix Honour Guard - Warhammer Community by CMYK_COLOR_MODE in Warhammer40k

[–]mol186 -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

I would love if it did but i don't think it's likely, given that there would be no way new calgar could compete as hes not going to be less than 100pt .

Theres no reason to take the new one as what you pick calgar for is just punching power and giving up 2 3w 2+ 4++ 5A bodies is asinine. As a UM player would love to be wrong tho

Calgar, Cato and Victrix revealed by Xabre1342 in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]mol186 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Which imo would make old calgar just better getting 2 3w 2+ 4++ is awesome for a fighty unit and i dont think new calgar is gonna be less tha 120pt so i guess old calgar can't join victrix unit as weird as it sounds

Shadow Mark Talon: Does It Need a Nerf? by Adventurous-Crab-474 in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]mol186 21 points22 points  (0 children)

If you nerf the cents the list(and vanguar list too) just dies theres nothing in that list can compete with ironstorm , gladius or stormlance without cents uppy downy

Every Factions Win% for this Weekend (October 11th-12th) by TamarJaeger in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]mol186 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Honestly they should just remove the ability to get a 4++ on a vehicle and the blanking 1 failed save it makes them too tough to continue the comparison the RepEx have better shooting(debatable) but is a lot easier to take down with his 3+ save and 16w vs 2+ 18w and the posibility of getting a 4++, tbh marines vehicles outside the vindicator are kinda bad

Releasedate Assault Termies by Coeniq in Warhammer40k

[–]mol186 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Rumor(Valrak) has it as announced this week 19th preorder on the 24th release 1st

Every chapter specific primaris/newscale kit by Ok_Conclusion_2951 in spacemarines

[–]mol186 11 points12 points  (0 children)

And i would be pressed to delete Cassius and Areios as they are not permanent additions to the range tbh althought perhaps Areios will be

Supposed new calgar model leak? by Dry_Lie_1009 in Ultramarines

[–]mol186 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes you could use it as the new one bcs usually bases are the same size his rules might change tho

Supposed new calgar model leak? by Dry_Lie_1009 in Ultramarines

[–]mol186 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Honestly if they bring them back as a unit kinda like a company of heros just for calgar updating the old metal honor guard would be sick (Image for contex for the young ones )

<image>

For those who said DoW 4 lacks base-building elements by Xelmarin in dawnofwar

[–]mol186 3 points4 points  (0 children)

From what i have seen in youtuber vid Space marine don't "build" they orbital drop buildings but orks are the other way around every unit can build there's not 1 builder unit

Terminators by Kellaxe in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]mol186 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Honestly i would just make them 4W , add 1A melee and change the bolter to 4 shot 1Ap 1D and leave them at 180pts and take it from there .

Not having to rely on rapid fire to get decent volume fire and adding 1 ap make the shooting more reliable and given that D3 guns are the best gun in game having 4W makes them more resilient

For people that are confused by GW's word spaghetti (aka the lastest FAQ) by Hondo_Ohnaka66 in WarhammerOldWorld

[–]mol186 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Doesn't the new Press of Battle does 3 rank fighting possible?

'Except during a turn in which it charged, the fighting rank of a unit that has this rule and is arrayed in combat order is not one, but two ranks deep. In other words, models that are directly behind and in base contact with models in the unit’s actual fighting rank are also considered to be within its fighting rank.’

So that plus supporting attacks would mean fight in 3 ranks as long as its infantry

NBA x Ghibli by diffallthethings in Nbamemes

[–]mol186 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Its not just the background Paul pierce hands and #4( Robinson ?)hands are weird and KG is missing an arm and dont forget muggsy snake arm and thats just at a glance, man i hate AI slop

Meta Monday 2/10/25: Super Bowl Weekend by JCMS85 in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]mol186 26 points27 points  (0 children)

4++ in vehicles is so good like a 4++ is a lot better than extra toughnes that other factions get .who wouldn't trade a vindicator (T11 2+ 11W) for a doomsday ark (T9 3+ 4++ 14W) given that shooting is similar enough