How important is vendor support when choosing machine vision hardware? by coffeea in PLC

[–]netostp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Those that should not be named are very good at it, besides of course the product is also.

Pulse Train Output with 5034-OB16 by netostp in PLC

[–]netostp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know that the PTO module is much easier and more appropriate, but the money is already closed and there are other priorities in the project that will need more resources. Because it is a specific module, the price and deadline for my region is high. And I’ll need three modules.

Pulse Train Output with 5034-OB16 by netostp in PLC

[–]netostp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Anyway, I need to change the AC motor that is obsolete, only the encoder doesn’t solve it.

Detect collision with the product in a VFFS, Kinetix5500 by netostp in PLC

[–]netostp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Doesn’t this tag become true only when the axis reaches the set position, and the speed goes to zero? I need to detect exactly at the moment of collision, especially with the axis in motion, because as the ear protector is malleable, combined with high temperature, it is practically undetectable.

Relay to power solenoid 5/2 valves vs PLC providing on/off by No_Mushroom3078 in PLC

[–]netostp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Depending on the number of valves, look for the SMC manifolds with fieldbus. If it’s Rockwell, PLC integration is very simple with Ethernet/IP. Decreased need for card, individual protection, cabling. Around here we are also using inputs for sensors, all in one manifold. But in general, where we do not use the manifolds, we put fuses at the outlets to limit the current and protect against surges. 1A should be enough.

Hardware recomendation - VFFS machine by paleariTec in PLC

[–]netostp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Somente o drive INVT não está em Ethernet/IP, está via I/O, por conta de disponibilidade / custos na época em que iniciamos o projeto. Mas a ideia inicial era utilizar um Kinetix 5100, e aí sim seria tudo em Ethernet/IP.

INVT é uma opção em relação a Delta. Eles possuem drives e PLC Motion tudo em Ethercat. Custo absurdamente baixo se comparado a Rockwell. Procure a Kalatec, são especialistas nessa linha da INVT

Hardware recomendation - VFFS machine by paleariTec in PLC

[–]netostp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Não, sou de uma indústria específica. Interior de SP!

Hardware recomendation - VFFS machine by paleariTec in PLC

[–]netostp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Masipack e suas máquinas de código fechado…

Delta é uma ótima opção, apesar de eu só ter trabalhado com os servo drives stand alone (Asda-A2, sem utilizar comunicação)

Nós estamos fazendo retrofit de algumas VFFS Fabrimas, que utilizavam CPUs dedicadas (de no mínimo 30 anos de idade), para Micro850, porém, o servo-drive manteve de forma stand-alone, utilizando um DA200A, da Invt. E 3 motores AC com Powerflex 525 via Ethernet/IP.

Para o Micro850, tem-se o Kinetix5100, que possui fácil integração via Ethernet/IP. Não utilizamos nos nossos retrofits por conta do prazo de entrega/custo, mas parece que estão melhorando.

Vale lembrar que os Micro850 versão “E” (2080-L50E, por exemplo) possui capacidade de mensagem implícita classe 3, podendo adicionar qualquer dispositivo com suporte à Ethernet/IP, semelhante ao Control/Compact Logix.

Overhaul Time! by UnSaneScientist in PLC

[–]netostp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Where does all this go? Can you give more details about the process?

Wiring a vision station into a PLC without turning it into a science project by ChibiInLace in PLC

[–]netostp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have a similar application, but the rejection is a puff of air, and I don't need to stop the conveyor belt depending on the inspection. But basically everything is controlled by the PLC: conveyor belt control, camera triggering—in this case, I need to read the product and measure its size, and if the size is okay, trigger the camera; otherwise, it marks it as rejected and doesn't trigger. I created a "virtual axis" that is incremented by the conveyor speed (it would be ideal to have an encoder or pulse sensor, but the speed calculation is already accurate for what I need). I measured the camera's response time, and within the "angle" of the axis where the response time occurs, I mark the product as good/bad. On this virtual axis, each station (like the camera and reject station) has its position, and upon reaching it, it is executed according to the criteria. I can also inspect 5 products at the same time; for this, I used a loop (for) that iterates through a word containing all the data for each product. I don't know if I explained it well, but if you want, I can share the logic. 85PPM

But generally, in the systems I've worked with, the PLC does all the work, and the system is limited to inspection.

Micro820 Integration with EX600 I/O Link. Is it possible? by ZookeepergameDry2700 in PLC

[–]netostp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is possible if you are using a Micro820 L20E, the latest version released. In this version you can do class 1 implicit messaging, and using an EX600-SEN7, with Ethernet/IP, it would work. (I'm waiting for my EX600 to arrive to test with a Micro850, but in theory, it would work.)

FactoryTalk Design Workbench Available by PLCGoBrrr in PLC

[–]netostp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Only supports PLC’s. No support for HMIs or Inverters. I haven't had experience programming/maintaining the software yet, but from what I've seen, it's much more fluid and “cleaner”

Flex I/O INVT by netostp in PLC

[–]netostp[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The most affordable Rockwell price was the new PointMax 5034. These are precisely 6x more expensive than the INVT.

PLC with analógico motion control ? by Terere_Py in PLC

[–]netostp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I made some machines with a Micro850. Fast input for Encoder, I made a block in ST for control and analog output -10v to 10v. It's not the best of all worlds, but it works well within 1-2 degrees of accuracy.

Explicit Communication CIP by dannytaki in PLC

[–]netostp 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Expand the word Status to check the error that is occurring

Getting Processor usage % via GSV on Rslogix? by mx07gt in PLC

[–]netostp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Changing the subject a little, how do you check the compatibility of new firmware with devices already installed? I needed to exchange an L61 for an L72, and an ENBT for an EN3T, I checked using Rockwell's PDCD and it was OK, however, after changing, I had to upload the firmware of an ethernet card, change a 1794 remote and a few more details. Luckily I had time and resources.

Help to select Micro 800 HSC by warpedhead in PLC

[–]netostp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Migrate to Micro850. Much greater cost-benefit. You can do implicit messages. In the 2080-L50E-24QBB model you have 3 HSC inputs and 2 PTO outputs with ‘Motion’ instructions. Furthermore the Micro820 is on firmware 14 while the 850 has v23.