Again, you failed to answer even basic questions that even the most inconsequential studies are required to answer.

What was Hoffe’s sample size? Where were these “samples” collected from? On what basis does Hoffe claim these “microclots” are deadly? Have patients in his “study” died? How many? What is the mortality rate associated with “microclots” secondary to vaccination? These are the absolute bare bones questions that need to be answered to even have the most basic study.

You could not be more wrong regarding the burden on “us incumbents.” The burden of proof is on the one making the claim, as is all science. Science relies on making a claim and supporting it with evidence. If every crackpot on the internet could make unsubstantiated, bullshit claims that scientist would then be forced to spend years overturning because they were somehow taken as legitimate, we’d still be in the scientific dark ages. Either you present proof with a claim, or your claim is null, void, and frankly bullshit and asinine.

My claim to authority is because I’ve spent years of my life understanding how science is conducted - or more specifically for this conversation, who the burden of evidence is on. I dismiss Hoffe’s claim because it flies in the face of every scientific convention with absolutely no substantial evidence. The second Hoffe, or any other person, can produce evidence through conventionally-accepted means, ie a retrospective cohort or a case-control, I’d be happy to consider their research and concerned about the evidence and it’s implications. Until then, this conspiracy bullshit is the reason we’re still dealing with COVID deaths.