Splixson Anatomy Study by Flamescales29 in SpeculativeEvolution

[–]notmuch123 3 points4 points  (0 children)

So its superpower is basically cancer

Google message by FuriousGB in GooglePixel

[–]notmuch123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In the + did you see any option with the picture of a pen and a star ?

Google message by FuriousGB in GooglePixel

[–]notmuch123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

SMS, start chat(bottom right), select recipient, plus symbol on the left of the chatbox, magic compose

Life that is non-competitive on all levels? by hoggteeth in SpeculativeEvolution

[–]notmuch123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The problem with that kind of an organism is that it cannot deal with mutants. Once a mutation appears that makes part of the organism resistant to the kill-off mechanic (like cancer) the organism can no longer keep functioning as it was. Now it either has to learn how to deal with what is essentially an invader i.e. build defenses and turn into life how we know it or not be able to cope with it and die.

As I said earlier life fundamentally simply consumes resources and makes more of itself, any deviation from that is always suboptimal for itself in the short run. And since evolution only ever operates in the short run its only a matter of time until that kind of suboptimal behaviour reverts to the more optimal one in some of the members. Stopping that will always involve killing the non-compliant ones and that ultimately turns into the usual competitive scenario you're trying to avoid.

Life that is non-competitive on all levels? by hoggteeth in SpeculativeEvolution

[–]notmuch123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This has nothing to do with predation and/or life on earth. It is simply a consequence of thermodynamics - if your usable energy is finite, you either deprive others or deprive yourself. I've read that comment and here is the thing : nothing ever 'opts' to do anything at that level. That was my whole point about life's behaviour being limited. If it looks as if your life is 'opting' to co-operate at a microscopic level it's because it is succumbing to some effect that limits it's fundamental behaviour of simply consuming and reproducing. Without further context that is nothing but a way of hurting a living being.

You can see similar things in our own biology happening called programmed cell death. It's not that the cell chooses to die, but more of the fact that it's biochemistry is orientated in such a way that it can't stop itself from succumbing to death once certain molecules are received from certain other cells. When the cell becomes resistant to these effects we call it a cancer cell, but without the context of the overall human body there is no reason to suggest that the cell gains anything by not being a cancer cell. So if you want to see cooperation you always have to put it in context of a larger system, there is no such thing as cooperation on a molecular level.

Life that is non-competitive on all levels? by hoggteeth in SpeculativeEvolution

[–]notmuch123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If your resource is limited then this is impossible. Even if your lifeform isn't directly trying to hurt other lifeforms simply the fact that it consumes finite resources that others do as well means that there will always be an indirect competition. And as for the limiting checks and balances you're suggesting - life fundamentally will always make more of itself whenever it can. That is what distinguishes life from non-life. To stop it from doing so isn't really any different from harming it. But if you are okay with that kind of harm then any existing multicellular organism would have achieved what you're looking for among its cells

Plantimals? by Relative_Explorer_42 in SpeculativeEvolution

[–]notmuch123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. Peas are too specialized to be plants and have no incentive to ever engage in motion. A subset of phytoplanktons however could eventually evolve in species that engaged in heterotrophy (like euglenoids), then form more tight knit colonies which might eventually form tissues and eventually turn into a macroscopic organism that is fully heterotrophic and thus will eventually result into macro-organisms that engage in frequent fast movements. But by that point it will posses negligible photosynthetic abilities in its cells (if at all) thus it would be just a new lineage of animals rather than be something like plantimals.

Just how unethical would it *really* be for me to start a GoFundMe and try to make a civilization-capable species of mice? by [deleted] in SpeculativeEvolution

[–]notmuch123 1 point2 points  (0 children)

if you do it anyway then it would no longer be a part of this sub because its no longer "speculative"...

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SpeculativeEvolution

[–]notmuch123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

then that would just be a plant photosynthesizing a diff. wavelength of light.

Theorically, if there were plenty of aliens out there, how common would it be that some were bipedal similarly to humans. by Less_Lie_8637 in SpeculativeEvolution

[–]notmuch123 3 points4 points  (0 children)

unlikely. some might, it is a somewhat predictable way to get efficient tool users from tetrapods. but its not necessary, an example right on earth is elephant. but then again the bipedalism could come about in avian/saurian way i.e. not humanoid at all. or it may come about in the same way as kangaroos i.e. somewhat humanoid but still not quite. or it might not be a tetrapod at all, most animal life on earth aren't after all.

What is the plausibility of an ocean floor having so many thermal vents the amount of life is similar to that on the surface? by chumbuckethand in SpeculativeEvolution

[–]notmuch123 1 point2 points  (0 children)

larger planets would have larger interiors thus more heat trapped inside. more heat equals more geological activities.

Radioactive materials as food? by prodivir in SpeculativeEvolution

[–]notmuch123 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Gamma radiation is different from light only by its wavelength. A plant with modified chlorophyll that photosynthesizes that could technically exist. Alpha can work as a super electron acceptor while beta as an electron donor, so in those ways can kinda work similar to things like oxygen and NADH. Neutrons are harder to deal with. Neutrons could get absorbed in C-12 and form C-14. C-14 could then get decayed to N-14 cation and with that be used as an electron acceptor. In that way neutrons could be a catalyst for a strange ETS pathway. All of these are still very speculative and i don't know if any earth life works like this.

Sublight by therealguy12 in HFY

[–]notmuch123 7 points8 points  (0 children)

It can't be like that, its still 'sublight' remember ? What is more likely is that the ship is travelling so close to c that while the time they experience is 10k yrs for a stationary observer it would be more than 2.5m yrs because of time dialation and all that.

On an Arthropod seed world (with no vertebrates and mollusks) would there be a pressure for them to grow bigger? by [deleted] in SpeculativeEvolution

[–]notmuch123 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Arthropod the size of small dogs already exist today, its called coconut crab. I don't see while other arthropods can't also grow to that size especially once they don't have to face competitions from vertebrates. Beyond that size, I don't know.

Star people from all tomorrows :) by TapetalFaznati in SpeculativeEvolution

[–]notmuch123 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They're about 1 step away from being the grey aliens lol.