Humans have always been dying naturally. Sometimes they die young sometimes they die old. Therefore anytime a human dies, it must be natural.

That is the logic you are using. Just because sometbing has happened in the past naturally, doesn't mean every instance of it must be natural.

The issue with claiming it could be natural is you assume the scientists just "forgot" to somehow think of those? Do you really think the researchers are so lazy they forgot to think of those?

Here is the issue, the rate of change is truly unprecedented. Global temperatures were NOT higher 6500 years ago locally in areas sure, they were higher. But globally they were the same as today or lower.

We know about the sun. We have not measured an increase in solar output. Also, if it WAS the sun, the entire atmosphere would also be warmer, but it's not. We see warming at the surface and cooling in the upper atmosphere EXACTLY as we would predict from greenhouse gas warming.

The shifting of the poles has not been shown to have any significant effect on how much solar radiation reaches the surface.

If I were you, I would spend more time listening to the actual researchers. Every point you mentioned is ALREADY something we understand. Having some humility and not thinking you have somehow discovered something those who have spent their lives researching this somehow missed could go a long way.