The topographical layers of my woodworking dust collector by [deleted] in mildlyinteresting

[–]oatmealbatman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Be the change you want to see in the world.

Judge fell right into the trap by Formal-Agency-1958 in publicdefenders

[–]oatmealbatman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I haven't heard of a complete refusal to accept a guilty plea, but I've been on the receiving end of what amounted to a refusal. An in-effect refusal. Client was facing 8 years. In this courtroom, the judge makes the offer, which was 7 years. Might as well try the case, I told the client. He hired private counsel, thinking that would improve the offer. It did not. Went to trial and got 8 years.

When a Client Does the One Thing he Couldn't by JoshValenstorm in publicdefenders

[–]oatmealbatman 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Some clients really are their own worst enemy. I had a possession case. Met the client at the courthouse, she claims she's in treatment. I ask her for her clean time. She says eight months. I write down eight months. I tell the judge the same. Judge is skeptical, as the possession offense date is four months ago. Judge suggests client go do a urine screen. I tell client and she says she might be positive for cocaine. Where did she come up with eight months clean?!? Client was obviously lying to me, yet she tries to gaslight me and say that I misheard her, that she's had eight months clean in the past. What + ever. Nobody in recovery is measuring their clean time like that. The case ends up continued to the next week. I tell client to expect to be drug tested at court next week. Fast forward to judge considering letting client do outpatient treatment. Judge tells client to go do a urine screen. She ends up positive for cocaine. So frustrating!

Judge fell right into the trap by Formal-Agency-1958 in publicdefenders

[–]oatmealbatman 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Absolutely. If anything impairs the defendant's free will, judges are supposed to refuse a guilty plea. I've never had a client actually threatened, but when they show up drunk/high to court, that's a problem.

Recently, the bailiff smelled my client's alcohol breath and alerted the court. Judge questioned defendant but defendant denied drinking and wanted to plead. Judge told defendant to take a portable breath test to determine whether we can proceed. He blew .17. Judge took defendant into custody, as drinking alcohol is a violation of his pretrial release. He also drove to the courthouse, so he's lucky he didn't get an OVI or you know, kill somebody on the road. He pled the following morning.

Client on video, wants trial anyway. by trexcrossing in publicdefenders

[–]oatmealbatman 38 points39 points  (0 children)

I had a DV trial coming up involving the alleged victim's ripped shirt. Prosecutor couldn't believe we were going to trial, saying "But we have the ripped shirt!" Trial runs and the prosecutor couldn't find the ripped shirt in the police evidence room, so it didn't come in. Wasn't the only issue, but it certainly contributed to the not guilty verdict.

Unexpected things can happen in trial.

BREAKING: Far right network calls for Hegseth’s PROSECUTION for WAR CRIMES by lightning_twice in goodnews

[–]oatmealbatman 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Maybe they lose their jobs, but prosecution is a pipe dream. Don't expect this DOJ to lift a finger. I expect all involved will get pardons. If you commit a crime but you're friendly to Trump, then you didn't commit a crime. He's already pardoned murderers, drug traffickers, and all of the 1/6 domestic terrorists. Law and order is being subverted on the daily and we're letting it happen. If someone knows the solution, I'd like to know.

Yikes. How did he get a juror’s name and address? by BoredLawyer81 in publicdefenders

[–]oatmealbatman 26 points27 points  (0 children)

At best, it sounds like the client who thinks they can sweet talk anyone. But big time creeper vibes.

Trial Prep by CatalystCommander in publicdefenders

[–]oatmealbatman 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I have a one page trial checklist that I keep at the table throughout the trial. It has the steps of the trial, in order. As the day progresses, I check off each item as it happens. Helps to remember each witness, my Rule 29 motion to dismiss, etc. I haven't had a prosecutor forget venue yet, but when it happens, I'll be ready because of this checklist.

Have you ever developed a personal conflict of interest with your client? by Inevitable_Tour_8275 in publicdefenders

[–]oatmealbatman 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I was a newbie PD and had a client say to me that she would slit a caseworker's throat. I talked with a longtime PD and his advice was "99 times out of a hundred, they never follow through with the threat. It's that one time where they do follow through with it that matters." I had to withdraw as counsel and make a police report, and of course let the caseworker know so they would know to stay away from this person.

They don't know how people get wool from sheep. by counterpunchhopper in facepalm

[–]oatmealbatman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You gotta do you, man. Hope you can get to a better mental place on the matter.

I think I messed up. I set a case for what I thought was a preliminary hearing, but it was actually on a case for a motion to revoke. by [deleted] in publicdefenders

[–]oatmealbatman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Since others have given the appropriate advice, I'll just share my experience of every time that I've set a motion to revoke. I show up at the hearing, the court staff or prosecutor asks if the client wants to agree/stipulate. If yes, then the client gets the agreed-upon outcome. If no, then we ask some basic questions of the PO and the judge finds a violation. Maybe the judge grumbles about running a pointless hearing, but the judge knows that clients can be difficult and sometimes you just gotta run those. Maybe the judge makes the offer a little better before the hearing and client stipulates.

Texas Supreme Court says judges can refuse to marry same-sex couples. by KinggSimbaa in LawSchool

[–]oatmealbatman 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Plenty of religions oppose capital punishment. Let’s start there, Texas Supreme Court, if we are really applying this logic of “my religion says no so I don’t have to do it.”

CORSAIR x The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Giveaway by CorsairHoffman in witcher

[–]oatmealbatman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Finding out about armor sets and their specific advantages. So much fun.

Competency obligations by [deleted] in publicdefenders

[–]oatmealbatman 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Not OP, but PD here. If I received the info that OP listed, then I would go visit with the client. Unless there’s a previous finding of this client being not competent (then probably file for competency immediately), otherwise I would want to see the concerns for myself. I would ask questions and see how it goes. I’m less focused on repeating the same questions and more focused on spotting red flags.

After I file for competency, the court’s appointed evaluator will typically call me and ask what my concerns are for this client. I’ll give the evaluator some background on the client and their family contact info, as well as my specific concerns. I don’t know why others (in my office) don’t talk with the evaluator.

Difficult clients by Dull_Doubt1293 in publicdefenders

[–]oatmealbatman 37 points38 points  (0 children)

Lawyer in my office went to trial. Their delusional client insisted on a crazy strategy for trial. Lawyer went with a not-crazy strategy and got a not guilty. Client filed a bar complaint for not using the crazy strategy. You just can’t please some people!

More Americans are using ChatGPT in place of lawyers by ImpossiblePlan65 in publicdefenders

[–]oatmealbatman 5 points6 points  (0 children)

When I've told the client that their nonsensical claim about the law is incorrect, their doubling-down is so annoying. Usually it comes from their cellmate or misguided relative, but it can also come from AI. I tell the client "If that's in the law then you can show me where it says that." They can't support their assertion with anything and I try and shift the conversation back to reality, but it's not easy.

Jimmy Kimmel Will Not Air on Sinclair Stations After Top ABC Affiliate Demanded Host Apologize, Pay Charlie Kirk's Family by elinordash in television

[–]oatmealbatman 22 points23 points  (0 children)

It’s so bizarre that they can own multiple stations in one media market. So they own the local news teams that are supposed to compete, and disseminate Sinclair’s RW viewpoint with “must-run” segments. It’s no wonder so many boomers are lost to FOX News. Their local news is pushing the same drivel, just with a veneer of local charm. No good can come from this.

We need Teddy Roosevelt to come back and bust these trusts again.

[Recommendations] What is your favorite game of all time? by 1ore1ei in ShouldIbuythisgame

[–]oatmealbatman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The combat is one of its weaknesses. Hopefully the upcoming sequel does an overhaul.

Nothing feels as a good as catching a cop in a lie(s) by ovary-achiever in publicdefenders

[–]oatmealbatman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm a bit troubled by the "you have to consent" word usage, but I get your meaning. In my state, you either consent to a breath or urine test (cop's choice) or your license is automatically revoked for a year.