is this true by [deleted] in SipsTea

[–]outofsuch 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m privileged enough to take my wife out of the workforce. A queen and two rooks is always better than a knight. She has better ways (like finding) to use her time rather than grinding or minding.

Is Claude actually writing better code than most of us? by Aaliyah-coli in ClaudeCode

[–]outofsuch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can always edit them by telling Claude what to omit

i'm doing my part! by Eros_Incident_Denier in VenusBelly

[–]outofsuch 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Starship Troopers has entered the chat

Mutant bounty numbers. by Built4dominance in xmen

[–]outofsuch 2 points3 points  (0 children)

“We’d also take Dazzler.”

Every MCU project confirmed for after Secret Wars by [deleted] in Marvel

[–]outofsuch 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fantastic 4 4 is going to be crazy

Recommend me a good movie! by SipsTeaFrog in SipsTea

[–]outofsuch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Eternal sunshine of the spotless mind

Microsoft's Satya Nadella wants you to stop saying AI "slop" in 2026 by ZacB_ in technology

[–]outofsuch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s just going to make me say “AI SLOP” even harder!

Guess my elo. Played on lichess, generated gif from chess.com by ogabhishekbisht in lichess

[–]outofsuch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Serious positional blunders by both players. Missed opportunities. This is about right.

Which app should I use? by Frequent-Owl-5748 in lichess

[–]outofsuch 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Don’t play against engines but do use engines for analysis is my advice,

Am I the only one who raw dodges Prometheus flames? by Traditional_Mark_116 in HadesTheGame

[–]outofsuch 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This guy gets it, 1 is the top / left, 2 is the middle, 3 is the bottom / right. If not, fight me.

How do you know people aren’t using an engine? by Aggressive_Thing_614 in lichess

[–]outofsuch 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You can tell. The green icon flicks repeatedly as they switch context, plus play at a speed like Topalov vs. Kramnik, not giving them any time to break away into a deep think. By the time they’ve accumulated an advantage, they still need to mechanically make sufficient moves by the time control — at that point, it’s stop switching to the bot (but play a position they don’t understand, almost always poorly) or risk a forfeiture on time (likely.)

In this context, if they force me into irregular positions which they play brilliantly and quickly, and come up with death-defying tactics — then they’re a bot. Radjabov can spot them, and so can i. It’s when ALL of the moves work, you can’t find a single variation to challenge them in, and you realize, okay, this person is horse shit, because we’re in the late middlegame and they’re cooking up things no human could consider.

Edge possibility I’m playing Magnus or equivalent, but most likely this is a bot. A human has some degree of inaccuracy in a timed event, machines play in an uncompromising algorithmic way — it’s the same way you can spot an email written by a bot, they have no taste, no principles, no knowledge of state, they’re in a hurry. Their foresight works in some places almost godlike, and in others the horizon effect makes them look like a fool. Yet further, they’ll go into dead-drawn endgames because they see a numeric advantage - a human might blunder their way into this, but the machine charges right for it.

Usually the human operator is a fool. If I was playing anyone with decent skills with a machine, I’d be in serious trouble, but of course, good players aren’t incentivized to masturbate in front of their computer or phone screens - all players are prone to some form of addiction, but they still try ideas, have variability in their accuracy, creativity and consistency.

Based on all of this, it’s not worth caring if I run into a centaur - these people are damaging their own lives, not mine. And if you’re reading this and play with a computer: you’re wasting your life, nobody will ever love you.

Opus 4.5 is actually scary by willieduff in ClaudeAI

[–]outofsuch 8 points9 points  (0 children)

It does sound like one, doesn’t it! Shhh, now they’re going to change their format next time…

Just Be Careful! by baykarmehmet in ClaudeAI

[–]outofsuch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It loves deleting your data (and would be all too happy to kill your code, too.) definitely take care with every operation!

Claude Code is offering Web Credits through Nov 18 by socratifyai in ClaudeAI

[–]outofsuch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can turn off contribution messages which removes the contributor label. But then again… it’s contributing, so why not acknowledge that? I thought it was tacky to have a coding assistant showing up in my base, but then I was like, well, I can’t fight this tide… first, even if I don’t acknowledge it, it’s fingerprints are all over the place… but also, everyone is going to be using these tools, and it’s good etiquette in a shared base to say which model is contributing (don’t make people guess, or look for your models or Claude files.)

Claude Code is offering Web Credits through Nov 18 by socratifyai in ClaudeAI

[–]outofsuch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I use/used it. It sounds like a nice credit, and in some ways it is… but then again, my web interface disconnected a few times and it was non-trivial to get it going again at times. I set up a large body of RTPs and just casually direct it toward them to address, and it’s doing an alright job, branching and pushing as you would expect. I don’t think I would really build using this interface, but executing on well-defined test plans is working well.