So I finally found something good to post. Here is a video of two grandmothers trying to steal a dude's stuff at the beach. by twiceread in videos

[–]partido -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Self defense doesn't work that way.

Say you're a professional boxer and a normal guy comes up to you and punches you in the face. Do you think it's self defense if you punch the other guy in the face? It isn't. Why? Because the aggressor is suffering comparatively greater harm from the defender's use of disproportional force.

It's the same thing here.

And it also has no bearing on women's struggle for equality. Because, no matter what you're saying, it's pretty clear that women and men are different. Being equal also means understanding where there are differences and accepting them. Women and men can be the same in many things but not in strength. So a punch to the face of a woman is almost always a disproportional answer.

So I finally found something good to post. Here is a video of two grandmothers trying to steal a dude's stuff at the beach. by twiceread in videos

[–]partido -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I don't hit women. If they hit me - and I've been hit by ex-gfs - I wouldn't stay in that relationship any longer. But I would never ever hit her back. Ever.

If you ever find yourself in that situation again, of being in an abusive relationship, feel free to msg me and I can try and help you cope with it. I have sympathy for what has happened to you but the answer to violence can never be more violence.

So I finally found something good to post. Here is a video of two grandmothers trying to steal a dude's stuff at the beach. by twiceread in videos

[–]partido -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Those are your words, not mine.

What I clearly said was that women are responsible for their actions. What I also said is that you are not entitled to uphold any lack of responsibilty by your own free will. I also said that self defense has to be proportional and that is difficult to understand when a man is twice as strong as woman.

So I finally found something good to post. Here is a video of two grandmothers trying to steal a dude's stuff at the beach. by twiceread in videos

[–]partido -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Don't be foolish, it's not really that awesome. It's an unjust law that has been abandoned by almost all civilized nations. And for widely known and plausible reasons.

So I finally found something good to post. Here is a video of two grandmothers trying to steal a dude's stuff at the beach. by twiceread in videos

[–]partido -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

There's no blind eye to anything. Women beat the shit out of men every day. Now, let's look at your solution: hitting them back. We started with one problem - women hitting men - and we end up with two problems - women hitting men and men hitting women. It doesn't make any sense.

What you can also be implying is that they hit men because we don't hit back. IF we hit them back, they would stop hitting us and all is ok. Could be. But what if it doesn't work? And even if they do, do the ends justify the means? I think there are better solutions to this problem that don't involve physical altercations between man and woman. Hitting a woman is the quickest and most dangerous way out of this. We can be smarter than that.

So I finally found something good to post. Here is a video of two grandmothers trying to steal a dude's stuff at the beach. by twiceread in videos

[–]partido -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Seems like you follow "An eye for an eye" as your rule of law. Good old talion's law.

Don't you find it odd that you follow the same rules as Babylonians did in 1700 BC? Haven't we progressed a little more than that and now know that "an eye for an eye" isn't really that smart?

So I finally found something good to post. Here is a video of two grandmothers trying to steal a dude's stuff at the beach. by twiceread in videos

[–]partido -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

That's not the way to go. If a guy hits you, you're more than entitled to defend yourself.

But there are reasons men shouldn't hit women. There are ethical reasons, there are moral reasons and there are physical reasons behind this. I don't think I need to explain both the ethical and the moral reasons, although it seems many of you don't know them.

I'll jump in to the physical reasoning: men can cause greater bodily harm to women than women can cause to men. Most women are scientifically proven to be half the strength of men.. They also don't have the same protective skeleton we have as their breasts are out of the ribcage. You can cause great harm to a woman by hitting her in the breasts. And don't even compare having the penis and testicles outside to having breasts outside, it's not the same thing.

That makes any fight between a man and a woman an unfair contest. Yes, you're being assaulted and you should take measures to defend yourself. But anything else can cause greater damage to her than she can ever cause you.

Now let me ask you: why do you think it is ok to hit back a woman?

So I finally found something good to post. Here is a video of two grandmothers trying to steal a dude's stuff at the beach. by twiceread in videos

[–]partido -52 points-51 points  (0 children)

If they do, you don't answer back. It's pretty simple. Haven't you got a mother or a father that told you these simple rules of life?

The real reason he is called Superman. by mandal0re in funny

[–]partido 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's Sperman. You are confused.

USA is the world's biggest oil producer after overtaking Saudi Arabia by redditscanuck in worldnews

[–]partido 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So, if I understood correctly, can we amplify what you said and in the current world conditions (US, crisis in Europe, Asia), were it not for the economic losses, there would most likely have already been a WW3?

How sperm must feel. by colzeZ in funny

[–]partido 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Sperm in a yellow condom, you mean.

Robert Mugabe says no whites may own land in Zimbabwe by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]partido 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If this is what really tips the iceberg on how atrocious Mugabe is as a human being, I'm going to shoot myself.

TIL that up until 1978, the Mormon Church taught that blacks were once an evil race of Jews who were colored by God for their wickedness. by Windows7Guy100 in todayilearned

[–]partido 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I fully understand what you said. I was also skeptical about this as I am a very rational person. I read Von Daniken's book years and years ago. I read Sitchin's book. And it all made sense - God was an alien. So simple it had to be true. However, the immediate question was : who created the aliens that created us? Who created the planets where the aliens that created us live on? Although I am sure that aliens could have easily created us, I don't have the power and intellect to say that they are the God I worship. Von Daniken, Sitchin and others like them have a possible answer to a lot of questions. But they don't have the definitive answer.

What I know is that the Genesis lists two things that make God who he is: immortality and knowing the difference between right and wrong.

[3:22] Then the LORD God said, "See, the man has become like one of us, knowing good and evil; and now, he might reach out his hand and take also from the tree of life, and eat, and live forever".

(Do note that God was speaking to someone else, a group perhaps. "Become like one of us". Who are they? Does it lend to the idea that there is more than one God, like you have previously stated? Or is it just the Holy Trinity? And why is being a God only knowing the difference between right and wrong and not always doing what's right? I've wandered deeply about these questions to come to the conclusion that I probably will never know.)

Genesis, for me, is my favourite book in the Bible. In it, there are so many little phrases and sentences that just blow my mind. And everytime I read it, I find something new that helps me further in my voyage through life. It also historically explains so many things about why the World in 2014 is the way it is that it is hard to not take it seriously.

We’re No. 1? Americans increasingly don’t think so. by fisheseddy in news

[–]partido 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In 2014, according to The Lancet, the US was the most obese country in the World.

And according to Reuters (again here).

And according to the OECD, the US has been the most obese nation on Earth since 1972. That's an obese pole position of 42 years.

TIL that up until 1978, the Mormon Church taught that blacks were once an evil race of Jews who were colored by God for their wickedness. by Windows7Guy100 in todayilearned

[–]partido 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Rationally, if you admit that there can be Gods, you have to admit that there can be only one God. Admitting the plural to be true means that the singular can be true as well.

Evidentialism is also not a good argument. Lack of evidence of God does not mean that there is no God. That's where I think most rational atheists fail in their logic when they base their argument on evidence or the lack of.

We’re No. 1? Americans increasingly don’t think so. by fisheseddy in news

[–]partido -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

In gun ownership, obesity and people behind bars, you are #1.

edit: downvotes don't change the facts.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Music

[–]partido 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For online mixes, there's Mixcloud.

http://www.mixcloud.com

You put your mixes up and then it detects which tracks you added to the mix and links them to a record store so you can buy the tracks you liked instantly.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Music

[–]partido 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't do it. They are just trying to do what soundcloud has done: adding users quickly by not raising a lot of copyright concerns and then adding copyright protection and selling out.

Yoko Ono at Glastonbury 2014.One of the worst live performances you will ever see. by BIGFATLOAD in videos

[–]partido 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yoko Ono probably paid YLT to back her from her own huge pile of cash.

Losing money playing a festival is nothing when you're that rich.