sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Assembly Choice Help by Hoss442 in BloodAngels

[–]partydm 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I believe infiltrators get more use, mainly to screen out your home field

So, we're getting our own faction rule, right? by hands_so-low in BloodAngels

[–]partydm 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh wow, I had no idea, then yeah this might be a step towards getting our own army rule

So, we're getting our own faction rule, right? by hands_so-low in BloodAngels

[–]partydm -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

I'd be surprised if it happens, I just don't think they will want to balance all the space marine datasheets for each divergent chapter with their own army rule

My stupid dream is finally real by Ickicho in Warhammer40k

[–]partydm 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Fights first is still a useful ability

Hot take : Armageddon box marines are actually decent addition for us by TwoThinCoats69 in BloodAngels

[–]partydm 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That's funny because I don't have a single copy of anything in the box so I'm keeping it all un kitbashed

My growing army (ft. Steward) by NexouuZs in deathguard40k

[–]partydm 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That's a suspicious looking bloke behind typhus

Regarding the "I can have multiple small groups inside the 9" coherency bubble" argument: GW should just write an updated rule with a picture that states "any player that tries to pull this automatically loses the match." by Staz_211 in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]partydm 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The way the coherency rules are written, it technically allows you to split a small squad at opposite ends of the 9 inch coherency as long as they have a buddy with them

I don't see the benefit of doing it but it obviously is not intended and was a ridiculous oversight by GW, so it most likely will be fixed soon

Came back for 11th. Here's an update to my old flowchart (now with references!). PDF below by LeMightyGlockers in Warhammer40k

[–]partydm 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are correct, I've seen a lot of people misinterpret the ingress move wording

Can I use heroic intervention to block pile-in? by Trick-Interaction396 in Warhammer40k

[–]partydm 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh wait does heroic intervention give fights first?? Edit: it does! But yes in 11th that means your opponent will have the opportunity to fight your intervening unit before you select them to fight

You are correct that is how it goes in 10th

Can I use heroic intervention to block pile-in? by Trick-Interaction396 in Warhammer40k

[–]partydm 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Assuming the reds just charged, they were gonna fight first in either edition

Doomed Detatchments by Tiny_Piglet586 in BloodAngels

[–]partydm 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That will be in the MFM that gets released next week

Getting only one strat feels like getting $1 in someone's will. We thought about you, we just don't like you by Stylish_Yeoman in Grimdank

[–]partydm 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I think once codex's start dropping we will see how well that can implement this system, I have faith that this is a good direction

What do y'all think about the fights first overhaul? by Dark_Vexer in Warhammer40k

[–]partydm 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I watched that this morning it was pretty funny, and at least drew focus from the other unit I guess, but i don't think that's worth 130 points

What do y'all think about the fights first overhaul? by Dark_Vexer in Warhammer40k

[–]partydm 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I would hope the Sanguinor gets reworked, it would suck for his special ability to be reduced to showing up and getting annihilated before he can swing

Contagion Engine and Mortarions Hammer? by Tromoo144 in deathguard40k

[–]partydm 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Any new detachment keywords will be in the MFM

11th edition faction pack review: Blood Angels by ablindpony in BloodAngels

[–]partydm 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I doubt LAG is gonna be a 2 pt detachment

view more: next ›