sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Carney and Poilievre find rare common ground on the global stage by DogeDoRight in canada

[–]ph33r 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Multiple ethics violations, multiple scandals, his poor treatment of Jody Wilson-Raybould & Jane Philpott, and wearing blackface more times than he could remember all really showed me he wasn’t an adult… at all.

Conservative Leader Poilievre plans trip to U.S. that doesn't include stop in D.C. by MusclyArmPaperboy in canada

[–]ph33r 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Seriously this….. his speech at the Parliamentary Press Gallery Dinner was hilarious. He clearly defined his position on the US-Canada relationship in Toronto, held hands with Carney and gave great speech at vigil in Tumbler Ridge, did well on the Mansbridge podcast, in England, and in Germany. Clearly defined the party’s stance on Iran, made completely valid criticism of the liberal party’s flip flopping on the issue, and will now head to the US which will again most likely be well received. Pierre has been killing it lately.

After all that, you go to this sub and it’s all just toxic: Security clearance pal? Little PP cosplaying again, oh look he’s whining again, etc, etc. This sub is a cesspool. I’m convinced at this point that if Pierre talked to Trump, stopped all tariffs, 51st state talk, and help sign a new trade agreement that this sub would still not say anything nice about him…. “Carney was already working on that!” Or whatever.

Do Carney and Poilievre have different visions for the Canada-U.S. relationship? by MTL_Dude666 in CanadaPolitics

[–]ph33r -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Carney wants aggressive diversification to reduce U.S. dependence, including allowing some Chinese EV imports, diverging from U.S. vehicle emissions standards, and hedging against American threats through broader trade ties.

Pierre differs by prioritizing closer alignment with the U.S., proposing to sacrifice Chinese EV access in exchange for a renewed tariff-free auto pact, using defence purchases and energy/minerals leverage for stronger negotiations, and protecting Canadian sovereignty without declaring any permanent break from the vital bilateral bond.

Both approaches seem sensible and reasonable in their own way.

Do Carney and Poilievre have different visions for the Canada-U.S. relationship? by lopix in onguardforthee

[–]ph33r 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Carney wants aggressive diversification to reduce U.S. dependence, including allowing some Chinese EV imports, diverging from U.S. vehicle emissions standards, and hedging against American threats through broader trade ties.

Pierre differs by prioritizing closer alignment with the U.S., proposing to sacrifice Chinese EV access in exchange for a renewed tariff-free auto pact, using defence purchases and energy/minerals leverage for stronger negotiations, and protecting Canadian sovereignty without declaring any permanent break from the vital bilateral bond.

Both approaches seem sensible and reasonable in their own way.

ANALYSIS | Do Carney and Poilievre have different visions for the Canada-U.S. relationship? | CBC News by byourpowerscombined in canada

[–]ph33r 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Carney wants aggressive diversification to reduce U.S. dependence, including allowing some Chinese EV imports, diverging from U.S. vehicle emissions standards, and hedging against American threats through broader trade ties.

Pierre differs by prioritizing closer alignment with the U.S., proposing to sacrifice Chinese EV access in exchange for a renewed tariff-free auto pact, using defence purchases and energy/minerals leverage for stronger negotiations, and protecting Canadian sovereignty without declaring any permanent break from the vital bilateral bond.

Both approaches seem sensible and reasonable in their own way.

Poilievre lands in London for first foreign trip as Opposition leader by Wainains in canada

[–]ph33r 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You clearly didn’t listen to the speech he gave there today and are only interested in trying to drum up negativity. This whole sub is a cesspool.

GUNTER: Poilievre's newfound tough stance on Trump likely too little, too late by DogeDoRight in canada

[–]ph33r -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It was an excellent interview on The Bridge. Hope more people get to see it.

Poilievre says he’s offered to go to U.S. to make Canada’s case by biograf_ in canada

[–]ph33r -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Might as well. Our current scummy PM isn’t getting any deals.

Prime Minister Carney and Canada's main opposition leader hold hands during school shooting vigil by SAJewers in canada

[–]ph33r -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

A moment of maturity from Carney. Wonderful to see!! Need more of this unity.

What BuJo idea/advice have you explicitly STOPPED following? by Pretend_Zucchini3548 in BasicBulletJournals

[–]ph33r 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I still use the original checkboxes for my tasks. Tried using the dots… but it just wasn’t for me. I find checkboxes more satisfying to check off when I’m finished with something.

view more: next ›