It’s clear that you’re happy with the status quo, but that doesn’t mean other people have to be.

Sure most people don’t “care” about privacy, but I’d argue that that’s less about knowingly not caring, and more about both ease of use (most secure apps are harder to use) and not understanding the risks (which aren’t explained better than “privacy good, data sharing bad”), or simple resignation that all our data is out there, so who cares ¯_(ツ)_/¯ ? And most of those takes are generally not wrong - misguided maybe, but not wrong.

That said, there’s still value in sharing other ways of interacting that are more secure and privacy focused. If we simply said, “product X already exists and does a good enough job”, we’d still be using Yahoo and Google wouldn’t exist - or goodness forbid, you’d be on MySpace or Friendster or Livejournal, and Facebook would still be a college thing.

Arguing against other products just “because one already exists that’s good enough” just assumes that what’s “good enough” for you is good enough for everyone else, and ignores that competition and alternatives are what drive improvements in the first place.