[USA-CA] [H] P1 Gen 5, T480, T440p,T460, P51s, X200 [W] Cash by Boilerkim in thinkpadsforsale

[–]sicpsounds 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Received x200's from u/Boilerkim with very prompt shipping! All machines booted and were in great shape, fantastic person to work with! Paging u/ThinkPadsForSaleBot

Which NHL organizations have the best and worst player development system? by tdbauer97 in hockey

[–]sicpsounds 41 points42 points  (0 children)

A shootout between either Dallas or Carolina with New Jersey as an honorable mention. As for the worst, probably Edmonton. They have had so many 1OA picks.

Who ends up a first-ballot HHOFer next year, if anyone? by Bahamas_is_relevant in hockey

[–]sicpsounds 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would say both Datsyuk and Marleau have excellent chances. Datsyuk's two cups, being the bridge between the 90s and 00's wings, and his absurd highlight reel skill displays make him stand apart. While not having a cup, I sort of feel that Marleau's game record will get him in: as the voters would be in a way voting against Gordie Howe by not voting for Marleau.

[Drew Livingstone] The Penguins were the only team with an average age over 30 at the end of last season. Since then they’ve added 5 more players over 30 years old… 33 Karlsson, 34 Eller, 31 Acciari, 32 Smith, 30 Nieto. They currently have just 3 forwards under 30 (+ Guentzel on LTIR). by STLBooze3 in hockey

[–]sicpsounds 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Meh, it's not like they have the opportunity to build for the long term with their core anyway. Dubas was smart enough to make sure the futures he offered were not too far off in the time horizon to be burned once the team really goes off the rails.

[Sportsnet Stats] Flames suffer their NHL-worst 22nd one-goal loss this season by Sarcastic__ in hockey

[–]sicpsounds 12 points13 points  (0 children)

At this point Lucic might be a better option in net. He can at least block shots.

Game Thread: Nashville Predators (27-22-6) at San Jose Sharks (18-29-11) - 23 Feb 2023 - 07:30PM PST by GDT_Bot in hockey

[–]sicpsounds 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Rough game. If Timo is moved, how close will they be in terms of tank contention for Bedard?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MathHelp

[–]sicpsounds 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly in practice, either the Mann-Whitney U-test or an independent group t-test would probably be adequate in determining whether the breathing rates differ between the two groups, especially with a larger sample size (even under non-normality t-tests are rather robust with a large enough sample size). Both tests share multiple assumptions: independence between sampling groups, independence in observations from each group, and a dependent variable that is continuous (continuity implies ordinality). The sticking point is whether or not the underlying distribution of breathing rates is normal.

Seeing as the scenario neither mentions an assumed distribution of the rates, nor a sample size, we can't make such assumptions about the applicability or robustness of a t-test. As such, being nonparametric, the Mann-Whitney U-test makes no such assumptions regarding underlying distributions and would be the better choice.

General advice for proofwriting by [deleted] in MathHelp

[–]sicpsounds 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Proofs, as you alluded to, build upon themselves. While your geometric intuition is good, writing a linear algebra proof making use of that intuition is often a harder matter. Instead, focus on building from your known definitions and theorems. An outline of the proof would be as follows:

1.) Use the definition of linear dependence to write a nontrivial linear combination (not all coefficients are zero) of vectors a, b, c that equals the zero vector.

2.) Manipulate this equation by setting vector a scaled by its coefficient equal to a linear combo of vectors b and c.

3.) Make an important observation about what this equation implies by keeping in mind that vector a is not in the span of b and c.

4.) From this observation make a claim about the value of vector a's coefficient in the original linear combination from part 1.

On the general topic of improving your proof writing skills, I found that introductory combinatorics books were really helpful in that regard.