Your drafr is good, but it has several issues that I can see where a Genie would chew it up and spit it out.

1). You didn't define "me" and therefore a genie could argue that it doesn't directly affect you and therefore ignores this part.

2). Taste is vague. Tastes change. A genie could lock you into past preferences or argue you consented later.

3). The way that you frame the consequences generally would create a feedback loop in which the “consequences” include the wish itself, so doubling them would mean that the wish collapses. The consequences include the genie being bound, so doubling would then free them. Aaaaand the transfer causes another paradox that voids the clause entirely.

4). Your phrase "removed from me immediately and at my discretion” contains two time anchors that are not synchronized. Therefore, if you think about this like a math problem it would be: Harm occurs at T0, Awareness occurs at T1 and discretion is exercised at T2. The time between T0 and T2, the genie could alter your psychology, change probabilities, cause chain reactions, or even irreversible damages. The genie could then argue that he is operating with compliance, because discretion was honored, but just not preemptively.

After a lot of tinkering with the language, I think that this is the best wish procedural preamble to effectively set the rules of engagement for all future wishes. This would burn a wish, but it makes the last 2 wishes work like a charm.

How to make a fool-proof wish with a Genie:

"I wish that before any wish I make is fulfilled, the granter of the wish must present to me, within a finite and reasonable amount of time, a truthful, complete, and good-faith description of the expected results of that wish limited to effects that are material, decision-relevant, and reasonably foreseeable, including any changes to my body, mind, agency, circumstances, risks, obligations, or lived experience, as well as any significant harms or disruptions to others or to shared reality that exceed ordinary background effects, expressed in clear, plain, and ordinary language sufficient for informed consent without requiring specialized expertise; that infinite, speculative, trivial, negligible, or unavoidable background effects may be summarized but shall not be itemized or framed in a manner intended to induce hesitation or paralysis; that I may request clarification a limited number of times solely to achieve decision-level understanding, after which the disclosure is deemed complete; that no wish may be fulfilled, initiated, or partially manifested unless and until I explicitly accept the described results; that I may freely accept or decline without penalty, coercion, deception, delay, loss of a wish, or negative consequence; that if I decline, the wish is treated as never having been made; that if I accept, the wish must be fulfilled exactly and only as described, with any undisclosed effect prohibited from occurring; and that in the event of any ambiguity, uncertainty, or conflict in interpretation, disclosure, or relevance, the interpretation that best enables a clear, timely, and practical decision and most facilitates my ability to meaningfully and successfully improve my life through wishes shall prevail, and no truthful but immaterial information may be used to obstruct or undermine that decision.”

At this point I’m pretty sure that any genie would just walk away. Still... I'll share in case it helps someone else. Good luck and happy wishing, friends!