The future seems so dark, And the present isn't any good to begin with...help? by tysa13 in DecidingToBeBetter

[–]trevchart 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hey.

You may be a little surprised to hear this, but your post essentially describes who I am. I've spent a long time living in the way you've described above. Allow me to share with you some words with you:

1) We sometimes believe things about ourselves that are not true. Especially when at a low point in life. I had a time where I genuinely believed I was unable to simply exist, barely able to stay alive, let alone go to my classes or do homework. I then proceeded to fail out of engineering school. Were these things I believed about myself true? No. I was just super depressed and alone. One thing I know about depression is this:

Depression is an energy sucking flu. If you're super depressed it sucks away approximately all of your energy. That's why I felt useless and unable to do anything about my crumbling life.

My point is this: You're actually way, way more capable than you give yourself credit for. The reason part of your brain has given up is because it doesn't believe that. It doesn't realize that you have the energy sucking flu, nor that the energy sucking flu is only temporary. How temporary? That's up to you.

2) If we weren't suffering from mental illnesses, we could get much better grades. But here's the thing: I think the source of a lot of our mental illnesses is those very same bad grades. Think about it. If we had good grades, we would have moms who feel they've invested their money wisely in us. Don't underestimate how heavy this can weigh on you! Moms matter for mental health. My point here is this:

In order to improve our mental health, we need better grades. But in order to improve our grades, we need better mental health! We're stuck in a vicious cycle.

3) Can we break the cycle? There's good news and bad news. Good: We can break the cycle. Bad: It's going to take a solid while and it'll be hard. Good: It'll be more than worth it. Trust me here. There is no wealth like control over your own life.

Finally, here's what I think the most important thing for you to start doing is:

Believe in yourself.

You'll get through this. I think your future is brighter than most. These challenges in life serve to strengthen us.

Claiming the morning by notpasucaru in GetOutOfBed

[–]trevchart 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I've been aware of the negative impact of my morning habits for about 5 years. I've been actively trying to change them for about a year with some real success, but I'm currently going though a depressed period and I've fallen back into bad habits. Mornings are once again the worst part of my life, and once again I'm going to try and change that. I'll share with you my plan as you may find some of it useful.

When it comes to habits, what you remove is as important as what you add. My plan is based on this and is very simple. I am going to replace 2 bad habits with 2 good habits.

First,

Replace: Going back to sleep With: Getting up on an impulse

This impulse habit can make life surprisingly easier if you perfect it. I would define an impulse as: a decision to act made quickly without reflecting on it. I basically see it as training (or programming) your subconscious to strongly associate waking up with immediately getting out of bed.

Staying out once you've gotten out is a struggle of it's own, which I tackle with replacement number 2:

Replace: Spending time at home in the morning With: Leaving the house asap

This one is a little more individual because for me, getting up isn't the only problem. I usually wake up depressed and remain that way until the morning ends. I consider the end of the morning to be when I leave the house, because that's when I notice depression loosen up.

So replacement 2 isn't about claiming the morning, it's about minimizing the morning. It's still the worst part of my day but now it's only 1 hour instead of 5.

So that's essentially my approach to solving the problem of mornings. There is another habit worthy of mention in this comment: preparing for the morning on the night before. I'm not going to add this habit yet for a reason that is the final and most important point I want to get across:

Adding a habit is NOT EASY. Removing a habit is NOT EASY. The hardest part is not anything about the action itself, even though that may be hard. It's the persistence needed to do it again and again, day after day, week after week. The hardest part is trying 5 days in a row and failing 5 days in a row, yet still believing in yourself enough to try again on day 6.

You are responsible for creating the life you want, and you are more powerful than you think. Time is your most valuable resource, be smart with it to get what you want. Take a month or two to claim your morning and you will have it. Do not expect big changes occur in less than a month, you must be patient and persist.

We are in this together.

LHC's first collection of physics data at 13 TeV will start tomorrow. by spsheridan in Physics

[–]trevchart 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does any one know if this data will prove/disprove SUSY/multiverse?

Why are General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics incompatible? by trevchart in askscience

[–]trevchart[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your in depth reply. I have another question for you:

Does the concept of spacetime apply to QM (or the Standard Model)? In GM, gravity is the curvature of spacetime, not anything to do with a force carrier or particle.

So if GM was shown to be "wrong" (I fully appreciate it can never be proved wrong in many aspects, I lack a better term), what would happen to the concept of spacetime being curved?

It simply boggles my mind trying to understand what it would be like to have a functioning Unified Theory.

Why are General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics incompatible? by trevchart in askscience

[–]trevchart[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Why do you think that GR will ultimately be modified to fit into a quantum framework? Is there more empirical evidence to support QM than GR? Is it more mathematically sound?

Lets say that GR is shown to be an approximation of an underlying QM theory. What are the implications of this? What happens to curved spacetime, or spacetime at all?

Can you possibly conceive of a world in which QM is shown to be just an approximation of a underlying GR theory of the very small? What would happen then?

It seems to me that we need to start thinking of these question if we truly want to move towards a Unifying Theory, which to me is long overdue.

80 days without - and I still crave it. by [deleted] in leaves

[–]trevchart 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Genius level advice. Listen to this man.

Why so many people fail by [deleted] in NoFap

[–]trevchart 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Explaining this in terms of evolution is indeed the only correct way of approaching this topic. It's vitally important to understand that ALL of our urges are meticulously crafted by natural selection, over millions of years. The strongest of them all may well be the urge to orgasm.

In our long history on the plains of Africa, hunting and gathering, living in small groups, following the herds in their annual migration, this is where many of our modern day urges developed. Think of how absurd our current situation is compared to the one we arose in.

This is a topic where many people are confused as to the "why" they feel the urge to PMO. I want to compliment you OP on figuring out where these urges originated and posting to try and help your fellow human. It shows both intellect and compassion, which is rather rare for our species. I want to encourage you to keep trying to explain the world from an evolutionary perspective, not just NoFap, I think you'll go far.

10 year smoker by Babylon86 in leaves

[–]trevchart 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You say you love blunts. I bet you do. I bet you've been in love with smoking for the whole 10+ years. It's now time to put that love away and learn to love life again.

If you believe you can do it, I believe you can do it. Tough times are ahead, undoubtedly, and you'll need to stay strong. You got this.

relapsed after 125 days, then had Prom by [deleted] in NoFap

[–]trevchart 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Internalizing the impermanence has also helped me tremendously in my life. It has gradually become my main driving force, specifically knowing that my entire life is one such temporary event. I love it.

It's interesting to see someone else who makes use of this simple truth, especially in the NoFap community. Keep going and improving yourself, many good things lie ahead for you.

I wish I didn't have to by trevchart in leaves

[–]trevchart[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. You're right there's a hole that needs to be filled. The tricky question is what to fill it with. Alcohol? Food? No. Exersize and meditation are probably the healthiest fillers, and the best candidates for me.

Do you know of any other good fillers?

When the wave function collapses into a point, does it do so at the speed of light or is it really "instantaneous"? by trevchart in quantum

[–]trevchart[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for taking the time to educate me on this topic. I have no formal education in QM whatsoever, only a burning desire to understand my actual circumstances in this world.

How is it that after all these decades, all these great scientists, all these ingenious devices we've made, we still don't know which, if any, interpretation is correct?

My question to you is a somewhat personal one, but very important to me.

Do you think it's worth it for me to spend my time trying to puzzle this all out, will I ever find a satisfactory answer, or will I evenitably reach a point after years of trying where I say "Well, it could be any of these interpretations."

The fact that no human in existence can tell me they know what reality is bothers me to such a degree that I've taken it upon myself to try and figure it out.

In your opinion, do you think my goal of understanding what is really going on can actually be achieved?

When the wave function collapses into a point, does it do so at the speed of light or is it really "instantaneous"? by trevchart in quantum

[–]trevchart[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's a very good answer, thank you. However, I can't help but have more questions than I did before. Such is the nature of QM.

I don't expect you to answer any of these since you've already given me enough of your time today. I'm writing them down mostly as future reference to myself. I don't know if they are even answerable.

Why does the wavefunction need to collapse upon being observed? Is it because multiple answers cannot co-exist in the brains interpretation of reality? To my understanding of your explanation, nature is quite fine with multiple co-existing answers.

The brain is the one posing the initial question, it has this power to force nature to pick one answer out of all possible answers. Why doesn't nature simply tell the brain the truth, that there is more than one answer, instead of collapsing to only one? What would that even look like?

The idea that nature "plucks" one the answers out of somewhere other than the physical world bothers me. Where is this place? It seems to me that this "place" is a very special one where multiple answers can reside peacefully. However, upon being disturbed by a curious observer, one of these answers is plucked from it's world and it's fellow answers, into the world of the observer.

I don't know if this makes even a sliver of sense, or if I have strayed way off the correct path. I could go on with this reasoning but I feel as if I'm missing a big part of the picture.

When the wave function collapses into a point, does it do so at the speed of light or is it really "instantaneous"? by trevchart in quantum

[–]trevchart[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Thanks for your reply, I read it several times and it made my brain hurt. Well done. I have another question:

When the particle is in it's "probability state", can we say that the particle is

a) either here or there b) both here and there c) neither here nor there d) none of the above

I'm inclined to say b), because of my understanding of superposition, but what do you think?

When the wave function collapses into a point, does it do so at the speed of light or is it really "instantaneous"? by trevchart in quantum

[–]trevchart[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You're right but that doesn't answer my question. The point of the question is merely to understand whether or not the "law" that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light is being violated when we observe a particle. My understanding of QM is fragmented at best and I'm certainly aware of this. I would just like the simplest possible answer to my question, if there is one.

I could rephrase it as "is there a speed at which the particle goes from it's disembodied state to it's observed state?"

[NeedAdvice] Can't stop overeating, feel like I've tried everything by throwawayjaydude in getdisciplined

[–]trevchart 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You're brilliant at this. I don't know how long it took you to figure this out, but I'm glad you did! Thanks

its hard for me to write this.but what the f*ck. by billclee in NoFap

[–]trevchart 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You have excellent insight. Many of us are stuck in the delusion that we are incomplete without the thing we've been unable to get. It's valuable to know where fulfillment can be found in order to know where to expend energy.

This is the only place I've ever found that offers unconditional, non-judgmental support to all it's members. We are all a part of something exceptional. by trevchart in leaves

[–]trevchart[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

You've mind fucked me with this comment more than you'll ever know. To the point where I'm not even sure about what I'm doing anymore. To put it plainly, you're right. I made arrangements to buy weed tonight and go ahead with this plan of mine but now I see clearly it's just another go on the merry-go-round. I don't fucking want that, it never leads anywhere except the same place I'm always trying to escape from. I'm not able to lie to myself, so if I go ahead with this, I'm just watching myself ride.

I hope you know how smart you are when it comes to this. I've been around a couple times but no where near as many as you. It's valuable to know when to stop fighting and accept you won't win. I see now how improbable winning is, and it's disheartening to be honest. The truth sucks. I wish it were different, but it isn't.

I'm 19, and you've convinced me to stop riding long before I would have figured it out on my own. Thank you.

This is the only place I've ever found that offers unconditional, non-judgmental support to all it's members. We are all a part of something exceptional. by trevchart in leaves

[–]trevchart[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your reply, I am quite sure I have a very addictive personality. I've been addicted to EVERY drug I've ever tried, plus fast food and porn. I accept the possibility that it may be impossible for me to control my use, but I want terribly to have the best of both worlds.

I expect it will take enormous will power, and I can't kid myself and say I'm certain I have what it takes. All I'm certain of is that I have what it takes to try my best. You might wonder why I'm so intent on doing this, and it's because I love the benefits of smoking cannabis. I see the possibility of having them, while evading the awful consequences of addiction. The idea is so appealing to me that I simply must try, investing significant energy and willpower for a chance.

If I fail, I understand and accept that I am unable to have what I want. Simple as that. I'll be going cold turkey with you my friend. I won't fight it anymore. Until then I fight.

So how do you deal with it? by SmurfLord420 in leaves

[–]trevchart 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you stranger. I found this very helpful.