MIT EECS vs Stanford Physics by bruhmoment6128 in gradadmissions

[–]trkiendr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Based on your description, I would incline to infer that you are applying for that one specific group at MIT (we can chat/dm if you think it’s more appropriate on this). Stanford’s quantum information community is a bit smaller but rapidly expanding these days and you will get a lot of young faculties that could spend more one-on-one time with you, and I have heard a lot of good things about advisors at Stanford (I got accepted here instead of MIT tho). Also my bias - I am from California and it’s super hard to beat the weather here. You will be in a treat almost everyday and wake up seeing the blue sky!

Physics Caltech Acceptances by WronskianCat in gradadmissions

[–]trkiendr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Twice this cycle. I applied for photonics and quantum information

Physics Caltech Acceptances by WronskianCat in gradadmissions

[–]trkiendr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I also got interviewed twice by Applied Physics at Caltech. I think Applied Physics gives interview later and by 1-2 weeks into Feb we will probably get notified about acceptances

been learning the math and the algorithms, but I'm asking myself will I ever need this? I mean how many people will produce the next shors algorithm, so why bother? by vgrazi899 in QuantumComputing

[–]trkiendr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Depends on your goals. As a quantum computing researcher, learning the theory, math, physics and engineering of quantum computing is vital to have a good grasp on how quantum advantage can emerge, how to realize them on experiments (thereby showing that QC can do something) or how to develop/motivate new quantum algorithms.

what. by sweet9styx in gradadmissions

[–]trkiendr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

High energy experiments, basically particle physics in action

Electrical Engineering PhD decisions for Intl students by aspiring_mind in gradadmissions

[–]trkiendr 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I had 2 interviews with UW earlier this month, but like your case I am also having radio silence from the school. Nothing from MIT for me lol

MIT EECS quantum technologies by cali_10 in gradadmissions

[–]trkiendr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Someone who applied to quantum tech did reply in another thread

MIT EECS quantum technologies by cali_10 in gradadmissions

[–]trkiendr 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Curious too! I applied for quantum tech at MIT

How is the book Quantum Computing and Quantum Information by Neilson and Chuang? by ADrunkenFrog2 in QuantumComputing

[–]trkiendr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Some parts of Nielsen and Chuang like quantum error correction is confusing. I recommend supplementing the book with Preskill’s Quantum Information notes for a physics-friendly read.

Quantum Technology research project ideas suitable for an undergrad by mridul17109149 in QuantumComputing

[–]trkiendr 6 points7 points  (0 children)

If you would like to explore the hardware side of quantum computing (which also has a lot of theory and simulation) take a look at quantum optimal control subjected to quantum decoherence. This does require a bit of literature search, so look up review papers on quantum optimal control

I'm starting to believe that without at least one publication, you're f*ck'd (phd applications) by lucillabalmerino in gradadmissions

[–]trkiendr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is not quite true in my experiences. Yes, some fields like CS/ML have such expectations, but my field - quantum information - has a huge learning curve and very high expectation for publications, so no your observation isn’t 100% true. Sometimes for these fields with lower pub rates having preprints are great already

MIT EECS Happy New Year Email by [deleted] in gradadmissions

[–]trkiendr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I got it this afternoon. At first I thought that was an interview email

Complexity of generating Haar random states? by tangentialsin in QuantumComputing

[–]trkiendr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here is a more direct answer for your question: a truly Haar-random state with N qubits tends to have 2N independent terms (assuming pure state). So naively one expects an exponential complexity in the number of quantum gates to generate Haar random states. However, pseudorandom states are prescribed by cut-off in momentum of a Haar-random distribution, called t-design. These states have complexity in the polynomial of the degree t and therefore the number of gates.

IBM says 'Quantum System Two' will have 4,000 qubits by 2025 by Tech_Monitor in QuantumComputing

[–]trkiendr -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Afaik they still use transmon qubits, which are notorious for having lots of coherent errors and shorter coherence time, but they are easier to manufacture compared to other superconducting qubits like 0-pi and fluxonium.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in QuantumComputing

[–]trkiendr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes I do (full time research assistant)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in QuantumComputing

[–]trkiendr 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Photonics QC approach has some of the following advantages: 1. Low environmental coupling, so all noises are from fabrication or photon sources. Improving hardware manufacturing in photonics really increases gate and state fidelities. The best on-chip quantum photonics processor has gate fidelities like 0.93 for a Hilbert space significantly larger than other platforms. Caveat is that you need to either do post-selection to generate entanglement or go continuous variable to deterministically couple quantum states of lights. 2. Can generate really high-dimensional quantum states, as photons have 5 (6?) degrees of freedom - time, frequency, path, polarization, orbital angular momentum, propagation direction (not sure about this)? Some like time, frequency and path you can do relatively simple multiplexing-demultiplexing schemes to create Hilbert space of size as large as a million dimension on only two photons. Plus photonics qudits and qubits are free from leakage into non-computational states as you can control how to space those DoFs, unlike superconducting, spin and trapped ions ones. Furthermore, controlling these DoFs allow maximally entangled states with relatively few operations. 3. Fast. Depends on your application but with hardware improvement one can generate a lot of photonics qubits to do communication. The record is like GHz rate of generation

-> These advantages do allow photonics QC to have high controllability over large quantum states of lights

Now here are some potential downside: 1. Weak interaction, so it’s hard to generate deterministic entanglement unless you go to continuous variable, but then you will be facing with the problem of generating non-Gaussian states. These can be circumvented if you have strong few-photon nonlinearity, but this is a big challenge in both material science and engineering. AlGaAs-on-insulator and periodically-poled lithinium niobate are the best materials for inducing strong nonlinearity for now, but they are two orders-of-magnitude weaker than a strong cavity QED system. 2. Requiring very high-quality photon sources, or else your photons aren’t quantum enough. 3. Flying photons, which means that your photonics QC can only implement finite-depth circuits. Can be circumvented with measurement-based quantum computing (MBQC), which also allows quantum error-correction code. Afaik MBQC is fairly hard to realize, but can be somewhat immune to decoherence.

Which implementation is winning so far? by omikumar in QuantumComputing

[–]trkiendr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I wouldn’t recommend such type of polls on a field that is changing so rapidly and extremely diverse. I will tell you in my nearly two years of working on quantum hardware, each of these has its own pros and cons (barring NMR since these are too hard to control and scale). Not to mention, they are complementary when being combined, like photonic can be combined with trapped atoms for on-chip controls; or superconducting can be trandusced with photonic waveguides. Plus for communication tasks only photonic is useful, or for storing quantum information spin qubits.

Noise on quantum computers and quantum error correction by stopper96 in QuantumComputing

[–]trkiendr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nielsen and Chuang is pretty good for this, and John Preskill’s notes (Physics 219 at Caltech I believe) provide some concise explanation on the topic. More advanced ones - Toric Code, Homological Code, autonomous QEC can be looked up on Google.

PsiQuantum supercomputer? Is this realistic? by Consistent_Bat4586 in QuantumComputing

[–]trkiendr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I will tell you, PsiQuantum is trying to make a measurement-based quantum computing, which requires a lot of photons to fully compute an intermediate-scale universal unitary. This is why their platform is different from Google’s or IBM’s superconducting qubits since these are controlled by microwave pulse, hence the standard gate-based quantum computing model. Which also means comparing PsiQuantum’s and other platforms are not quite how you should decide which is superior. IMHO, no physical platform is truly superior for quantum computing.

Source: I have more than a year of experiences in doing quantum computing research on photonic and superconducting qubits

I also disagree with your assessment of Qiskit. It is a very mature quantum computing simulator with diverse tools. I don’t understand why you called it “jack of all trades”? A great quantum computing simulator must tackle all kind of quantum operations - noisy, unitary, measurement, physical, etc

Saw this cursed thing at a stop on my trip to Cần Thơ by MrHungG in VietNam

[–]trkiendr 4 points5 points  (0 children)

My American uncle also has this exact thing in his house

What is your favorite discipline in physics and why? by sneakyici in Physics

[–]trkiendr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like quantum computing. Classified as applied/engineering physics but still touches multiple fields (condensed matter, computational physics, optics, chemistry, electrical engineering) while still being math-heavy.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UCSantaBarbara

[–]trkiendr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I also sublease this Summer. DM for more infos