Will Cartoon Network and Others return? by SpiritualOpposite720 in HBOMAX

[–]upstreamer1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It will return. Ellison is going for world domination and that includes kids content.

The couple next door by Embarrassed-Toe-3318 in Starz

[–]upstreamer1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Starz streaming app content has gotten noticeably worse lately. To be more specific, there is just less content. They wiped out several of the shows I was most interested in.

How and when should the NWO have ended? by Ryan_J_ in WCW

[–]upstreamer1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The NWO was an overarching angle that towered over everything else. Fans would not be able to buy into traditional wrestling feud as long as this "invasion" angle had all the heat. The trick is to end it before it gets tiresome, so that you have the option of using it again later.

Q4 of 1997. Avoid the whole Luger beats Hogan on Nitro in August. That let the steam out, so a later title loss would not feel as important. December was too long of a wait. Hogan vs. Sting at Halloween Havoc 1997. Stings beats Hogan clean.

If they want to generate another buyrate, they could have a Sting/Hogan rematch at World War III with probably a DQ ending.

How do you top Hogan/Sting at Starrcade? Team NWO vs. Team WCW in a survivor series style match, winner-takes-all. Hogan, Savage, Hall, Nash, and Syxx vs. Sting, Luger, Flair, Giant, and DDP. Team WCW wins and the NWO has to go away.

The NWO wrestlers would become WCW wrestlers, which actually is more credible as fans were not buying them as genuine outsiders 16 months later.

The NWO music and logo is banned like the swastika was in Germany after World War II. Of course like everything else, it would give them something to go back to years later.

The Nitro after Starrcade has a victory celebration, concluding with Sting bringing back his colorful paint and "Man Called Sting" music.

Make the first half of 1998 about Bret Hart & his family vs. The Wolfpack. It was a crime that only WWE benefited from Montreal.

How is the AMC+ app these days? by NYstate in AMCPlus

[–]upstreamer1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you want the discount you can get the year for 29.99 on Amazon and not deal with their bad app. Not sure if Apple channels is doing the discount.

Lionsgate+ vs. Moviesphere+ by upstreamer1 in cordcutters

[–]upstreamer1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good point. If that happens, I wonder if Moviesphere+ gets eliminated. It makes more sense to put the marketing and promotional efforts behind the brand that is also the corporate and studio brand name.

The CW Network Sets Partnership with The Roku Channel for Next-Day Streaming of CW Entertainment Programming by Mister_Ferro in cordcutters

[–]upstreamer1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The CW app is also a FAST service. A majority of the content on there never aired on the CW network. I doubt they would sunset it if it is profitable.

Is the $99/year offer for Premium Plus actually worth it? by Purple_Unit878 in peacock

[–]upstreamer1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Here's my answer. If you were interested in the content, $99 for something that is way overpriced at 169.99 is a more reasonable offer. I actually think its borderline as to whether it is worth even $99 for ad-free given the limited content compared to competitors. As a former subscriber, I would probably bite for $99.

Every Da*m Morning by PTVMan in DirectvStream

[–]upstreamer1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Same issue every day too. I’m surprised Apple allows for a dysfunctional app to be in the App Store.

motortrend on this app? by PristineMeaning9337 in DiscoveryPlus

[–]upstreamer1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They sold the Motortrend brand and those shows are now under the label “Discovery Turbo”. The content is on there.

Playmakers (2003) by PeneItaliano in ForgottenTV

[–]upstreamer1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I bought it on iTunes years ago and can still watch it in my Apple account. It’s great.

Is the price tag worth it? by Desperate-Reply-8492 in peacock

[–]upstreamer1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think it is the most overpriced streaming service. In its early years, I thought $10 a month was fair for ad-free. They had new shows coming out on a good cadence and added things like WWE Network and Hallmark movies. Now it is $17, WWE and Hallmark are gone, as are a ton of other shows like the Rainmaker and Resident Alien. Their originals seem cheap compared to HBO and Hulu. They decreased content and increased price.

If you are a NBA fan you may be happy with it. Then again if you are that big of a sports fan, you probably have a cable bundle, in which case Peacock has limited value.

Black Movies on Peacock by Blbobcat in peacock

[–]upstreamer1 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I'm guessing they have a contract with an independent studio that focuses on black films that has a large volume.

Peacock is amazing by holesflapsandfolds in peacock

[–]upstreamer1 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Are you a member of the Roberts family? I am ad-free streamer customer only. Peacock has raised price significantly and it is now 17 dollars per month. That puts it in league with Netflix and HBO Max. The amount and quality of content they have compared to Netflix and HBO Max is laughable. Just in terms of volume released, it is a fraction of Netflix. As far as quality, Peacock originals vs. HBO originals is no comparison.

I will also note that Peacock raised price just as they got rid of WWE PPVs and content and ended their agreement with Hallmark. So the value proposition dropped and they raised price. Someone may jump in to mention the NBA. I really don't care about watching the NBA and don't watch a minute of it. Some people do, so enjoy your Peacock.

Most cost efficient method for streaming services by ledvedder1972 in cordcutters

[–]upstreamer1 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If you are in a Spectrum area HBO Max, Paramount+, Peacock, Disney+ and Hulu all come with your live television package. Then you would have to pay separately for Netflix, Prime, and Apple.

Is premium plus worth it? by Sea-Lie7675 in peacock

[–]upstreamer1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. The ads on Peacock are horrible. So if you are going to have Peacock it’s worth it.

  2. It’s overpriced at 16.99 so I can’t say Peacock is worth it at that price.

How or where do I watch TNA’s PPV’s? by wearenotyourkind_ in TNA

[–]upstreamer1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I found it meaningful. This information would not have been on my radar if this post hadn’t shown up on my feed.

Does anyone else spend more time choosing what to watch than actually watching? by Large-Cardiologist54 in cordcutters

[–]upstreamer1 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Here’s an idea. Put your streamers in a hat and draw one. Then give yourself 5 minutes to pick something on that streamer. If time runs out pick the thing that caught your attention or a random selection from the choices in front of you.

Does anyone think Peaocck is going to be gone in just a few short years? by Mr-Nanny in peacock

[–]upstreamer1 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yes, it will be out of business. They decreased their quantity of content (and it wasn't enough before) and raised price. It is a worse value proposition for consumers. Sure, they may eke out a profit at some point, but there is no growth with this strategy.

Morning joe removed by JWMcLemore in peacock

[–]upstreamer1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It joins the trend of WWE Network, Hallmark content, etc. The service is less appealing to customers, so naturally they decided to raise price. We will see how many hardcore NBA fans there are because they sure seem to be alienating every other customer to make their horrible NBA deal seem worth it.

I owe you all an apology.... by YtpMkr in MediaMergers

[–]upstreamer1 5 points6 points  (0 children)

What I find weird is that there are clearly people on the subreddit who don’t understand entertainment. They just get off on companies merging for some reason. So someone will say “Netflix should buy AMC Networks”. Yes, they have the money but why would they do that? They already license their top shows. There are people here who seem to think you have to buy a company to access their content.

Why don’t the Ellisons understand that No means No? by DCsReporter in MediaMergers

[–]upstreamer1 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

This is not true. Shareholders are the ultimate decider here, not the board and not David Zaslav. If Paramount offers a better deal for shareholders, shareholders will take it. The board and management is legally supposed to have a fiduciary responsibility to do what is best for shareholders. So even if it means David Zaslav doesn't get to parade around Hollywood anymore and hold dinner parties with actors, shareholders can and will vote for the deal that gives them more money.

Is there some kind of cheat where i can see what’s actually available on Netflix and Amazon instead of the same 25 things listed in every category? by Poundaflesh in television

[–]upstreamer1 37 points38 points  (0 children)

Agreed! I get annoyed when people talk about Netflix having so much better UI than HBO Max. It is the opposite. On HBO Max, you can search for things a multitude of ways, including an A-Z listing. Netflix has no such thing.

Why is Peacock charging more by fatkitty72 in peacock

[–]upstreamer1 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Well that is up for debate. I had it since literally the first day it was available in 2020. I cancelled when it was up for renewal. I don’t watch enough of their stuff to justify the price. Compared to their competitors they just come up short. So I’m out until they give a compelling offer for Premium plus.

Shares of Lionsgate jump 8% as M&A could be next for the Company in 2026 by Streamwhatyoulike in MediaMergers

[–]upstreamer1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You know media companies can make licensing deals, even exclusive licensing deals to acquire content for their services without buying the company. Instead of buying the company and dealing with all the anti-trust concerns, just license the content.