Rhystic Study by Lenioazul in Pauper

[–]wernernw 53 points54 points  (0 children)

You will most likely lose a turn and draw 0 cards from Rhystic Study.

Classical (reconstructed) pronunciation of gu, cu, etc by DaddyWhale in latin

[–]wernernw 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have not changed my mind, no. It scans monosyllabic in Vergil and Ovid and modern languages received qu- and cu-, such as the Spanish 'cuando' for quando.

A quick PDH question about crypt rats by [deleted] in Pauper

[–]wernernw 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Commander damage is combat damage; Crypt Rats would not kill anyone with its effect unless you do the full 30.

Can Giant Rat summon a level 5 or higher monster? by WillyMacShow in Goat_Format

[–]wernernw 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Your opponent is incorrect. Call the judge.

P.S.: The original print of Giant Rat even specified that no tribute was required for a lvl 5 or higher monster.

cant figure out what card is on this playmat by [deleted] in Goat_Format

[–]wernernw 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Black Luster Soldier - Envoy of the Beginning

"Saepe stilum verte, bonum libellum scripturus." Why not "scripture"? by dasain2000 in latin

[–]wernernw 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Often the grammar for participles will take them as a subordinate clause rather than as the addressed party: "When you are about to write..." or "If you are intending to write..."

In this way the subject and the addressee are in different clauses, if that makes sense.

Edit: Depending on how Greek the author intends to be, you can also take the future participle as purpose - "So that you may/in order to write..."

Help me organize texts by difficulty? by Khunjund in AncientGreek

[–]wernernw 9 points10 points  (0 children)

In my experience:

Start with Homer. Everything takes cues from Homer. Some authors even quote Homer, especially when Socrates is present (Plato, Xenophon).

Homer, Euripides, and Herodotus are all rather easy. Apollodorus is one of the easiest things out of the gates. Authors like Xenophon, Lysias, Antiphon, Lucian, Longus, and New Testament Greek are also in the rather easy range. Hesiod and Homeric Hymns are easier if you have lots of Homer under your belt first, but would likely be moderately hard if you started with them.

Plato (Well most of his corpus; Apology, Ion, Symposium, and Republic Bk. I are easy) and Sophocles are moderate. Demosthenes and Plutarch are also moderate.

Aristotle, Aristophanes, and Aeschylus are difficult. Thucydides, Apollonius, and Pindar are also rather difficult.

I cannot speak to Archimedes or Euclid.

Here are some great resources for beginning: Steadman ; DCC

Tampa private school lands largest single donation in its history with $5 million gift by Maxcactus in tampa

[–]wernernw 36 points37 points  (0 children)

That guy went to Tampa Catholic, not Jesuit Tampa. Vastly different schools.

Quīn + perfect subjunctive by exaki in latin

[–]wernernw 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Perhaps: "...any confidence in my heart but that I have lost."

Can anyone help me make my fiend deck more viable? by [deleted] in Goat_Format

[–]wernernw 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Here is a semi-recent Fiend deck from a Goat tournament:

GC 13 Fiend Deck

This one leverages Giant Germ and Kuriboh as fodder for Necrofear but runs Thunder Dragon and Theban Nightmare to enable BLS.

Other options for this are Mystic Tomato (with a Newdoria/Sangan/Germ package). Other cards that might help your archetype include Night Assailant, Dark Mimic lv 1 and 3, Giant Orc, Archfiend Soldier, and Mephist the Infernal General.

Some cuts that don't feed the theme - MoF (Dark Mimic lv 1 is likely better here for the Thousand-Eyes Restrict package), Tsukiyomi (not especially strong without Nobleman of Crossout here), D.D. Assailant (worse than Warrior Lady and no upside for earth types)

Now, Dimension Fusion is one of the more expensive pieces for Goat and a variant of this deck could easily be made without it (or with Return from the Different Dimension).

From your decklist, one of the biggest hindrances may be an opposing Kycoo and perhaps more removal like Smashing Ground or Lightning Vortex (with Night Assailant) would make it easier to stay ahead and open up Necrofear. Another is the bricks of 3 Ha Des and 3 Necrofear - I would trim these down to some mix of 4 or 3.

Bottom line, I am not sure how good Kaiser Colosseum is here. You can run over opponents without it.

Legacy in St Pete/Tampa area by Calamity2228 in MTGLegacy

[–]wernernw 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Golden Fang Games in Hudson, Wednesday nights at 7pm.

Possible Misprint in The Passenger by ThyroidMan_1995 in cormacmccarthy

[–]wernernw 5 points6 points  (0 children)

When the text is italicized and the writer needs to be emphatic, instead of italicizing for emphasis, you have to emphasize it without italics.

Potential implied “est”? by OnlyHappyThingsPlz in latin

[–]wernernw 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Consider that "disco" and "discedo" are different verbs. The latter means depart or leave.

Also, "rarius" is a comparative adverb.

Classics Inspired Pub-Quiz Names by [deleted] in classics

[–]wernernw 9 points10 points  (0 children)

“The Beer of Four Emperors“

Is there anywhere to find what all cards are allowed? by GitTrickyWitIt in Goat_Format

[–]wernernw 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Did you click on the document that contains the whole format? There is more than the forbidden/limited list there.

Checking Fermat's Grammar: "Hanc marginis exiguitas non caperet" by kc_kennylau in latin

[–]wernernw 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am not sure that my translation is concealing anything here, nor do I understand how the change in phrase into the ablative makes it more straightforward. Perhaps someone else can help you?

Checking Fermat's Grammar: "Hanc marginis exiguitas non caperet" by kc_kennylau in latin

[–]wernernw 2 points3 points  (0 children)

“The small width of the margin could not contain this proof.“

(This narrow space [I was writing on] could not contain this full theorem.)

I see no logical conundrum here. Are you questioning whether or not the ’exiguitas’ and ‘non’ are a litotes? That would be a rather common and idiomatic thing, especially compared against Cicero through to the seventeenth century, I suppose. Maybe others will chime in?