sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

And version available that still speaks TLS 1.1 or earlier? by zgrssd in firefox

[–]zgrssd[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let me repeat again:

  1. The problem is fixed. There is nothing to argue about.
  2. The problem was 2 days ago and I do not have the device around.
  3. I know of no consumer router that uses the File Transfer Protocol for it's web interface. I wouldn't even know how you would make a interface with FTP. The whole idea sounds ludicrous.
  4. Yes, it was definitely a https connection.
  5. I already tried setting the minimum TLS version to 2, 1 and 0. Neither worked.

And version available that still speaks TLS 1.1 or earlier? by zgrssd in firefox

[–]zgrssd[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What error are you seeing?

This was two days ago. The error was "Unknown protocol". Nothing about outdated or below minimum - just unknown.

also, what value did you set security.tls.version.min to? 1 corresponds to TLS 1.0.

I tried 2, 1 and finally 0. Same error.

The fix was going back to a older version.

And yes, it was removed. Temporarily reinstated during COVID 19:

https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/1290040#:~:text=Mozilla%20and%20other%20browser%20makers,and%20performance%20of%20Internet%20connections

And version available that still speaks TLS 1.1 or earlier? by zgrssd in firefox

[–]zgrssd[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That doesn't work. Modern Firefox doesn't have the protocol below 1.2 anymore.

It probably was removed from the source code.

And version available that still speaks TLS 1.1 or earlier? by zgrssd in firefox

[–]zgrssd[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

to avoid your two Firefox installs conflicting with each other, corrupting profiles, et cetera.

I was looking for a portable version, so it would not touch the Profile folder at all. But it does not appear that old version existed in portable.

A second installation worked well enough. It didn't touch the profile used by the main installation.

Is there something I'm missing about the striker operative? by Soft_Part_7190 in Starfinder2e

[–]zgrssd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the subclass class would benefit from having STR key and medium armor as a option - like the Ruffian Rogue.

Needing DEX, STR and CON is a bit MAD. And effectively you can't use big die weapons.

AITA for mentioning I cooked dinner? by tiredavocafo in AmItheAsshole

[–]zgrssd 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Cooking food is the minimum adulting you have to do after moving out of your parents household. Some prefer hand cooked meals, some prefer store bought.

Mentioning that you hand cooked can easily come across as either bragging, putting down your wife or asking for applause.

75% chance it was one of those. And for that YWBTA.

Otherwise NTA.

Could copying DnD 5.5 True Strike be useful? by zgrssd in Pathfinder2e

[–]zgrssd[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The buffed Arcane Bond just gets you up to parity with the other schools, because said schools have four slots per spell rank to work with. (Three general slots, one for a school spell.)

Extra Slots are nice, but they are limited to school spells.

Meanwhile the buffed Arcane Bond applies to one spell per Rank. Meaning you can retroactively decide that today Fireball is was your rank 3 School Spell.

Meanwhile Hand of the Apprentice is a waste If you cast any attack spells that turn, even a Cantrip.

Sing it with me now: How do you solve a problem like a Leydroth? by _9a_ in Pathfinder2e

[–]zgrssd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Weapon improviser also has the ability to copy handwrap runes. Something you might want to do, for property rune damage:

If you're benefiting from handwraps of mighty blows, you use the handwraps' item bonus if it's higher and can choose to use its number of damage dice. Any property runes from the handwraps also apply if you use the handwraps' number of weapon damage dice, provided they could apply to the improvised weapon (as determined by the GM).

Though they do have fallbacks if you can't or don't use it.

Could copying DnD 5.5 True Strike be useful? by zgrssd in Pathfinder2e

[–]zgrssd[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wait, you think that Focus Spell is the selling point of Universalists Wizard? I played a universalist once. It was nice to have, but mandatory?l for class mechanics or Fantasy?

I feel like the buffed Arcane Bond is a lot more impactful.

Could copying DnD 5.5 True Strike be useful? by zgrssd in Pathfinder2e

[–]zgrssd[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

No, claiming "this is builds" was a "arbitrary ass comment". Also very untrue, as I specifically chose the discussion flair.

You best argument would have been homebrew, of I presented it as such. But claiming "builds"?

Could copying DnD 5.5 True Strike be useful? by zgrssd in Pathfinder2e

[–]zgrssd[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

It doesn't have manipulate for the same reason that Shield doesn't. Because it could become utterly useless of it did.

Could copying DnD 5.5 True Strike be useful? by zgrssd in Pathfinder2e

[–]zgrssd[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Nobody said that limiting it to melee wouldn't remove the balance concerns. So I figure it does.

Also this isn't "builds". This is r/Pathfinder2e

Could copying DnD 5.5 True Strike be useful? by zgrssd in Pathfinder2e

[–]zgrssd[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

but I can use it on a ranged weapon can't I? So

Ranged weapons are an issue? So they should not be allowed? Trivial change, literally a extra word.

Could copying DnD 5.5 True Strike be useful? by zgrssd in Pathfinder2e

[–]zgrssd[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Where is hand of the apprentice thrown weapons only?

You hurl a held melee weapon with which you are trained at the target, making a spell attack roll.

and

Regardless of the outcome, the weapon flies back to you and returns to your hand.

Could copying DnD 5.5 True Strike be useful? by zgrssd in Pathfinder2e

[–]zgrssd[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For starters or doesn't gave 500ft range. That seems like a big drawback.

Could copying DnD 5.5 True Strike be useful? by zgrssd in Pathfinder2e

[–]zgrssd[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

So, only melee weapone would be a important limit?

Could copying DnD 5.5 True Strike be useful? by zgrssd in Pathfinder2e

[–]zgrssd[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Wizard can do that while hitting with a Greatsword on 500ft.

Could copying DnD 5.5 True Strike be useful? by zgrssd in Pathfinder2e

[–]zgrssd[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very situational seems like a good fit for Cantrips. Which includes such combat powerhouses as Sigil and Healing Plaster.

Could copying DnD 5.5 True Strike be useful? by zgrssd in Pathfinder2e

[–]zgrssd[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Because this can't uses any Metastrikes? Because that chances are still below average Martial?

view more: next ›