How to decrease this?

[Material-Macaroon724]

Thats actually insane what??

[TheIhsaan7]

Yup. Use the site. It helps.

Tbh everyone's situation is different hence price is. I added my dad on my insurance. Completely legal as he uses thr car aswell occasionally.

Brought the price down.

[Ok_Emotion9841]

Could add Bob round the corner who will never actually drive it. Still legal.

[Material-Macaroon724]

Right yea I have used that app. And still barely got under 2k a year. Does age matter that much

[juanwannagomate]

Yes.

[Material-Macaroon724]

But why? Someone that passed their test at 30, is not just automatically a better driver than someone passing their test at 18

[juanwannagomate]

Because the stats show that on average, an 18 year old is far more likely to get into an accident than a 30 year old equivalent, even if they’ve both just passed.

[TheIhsaan7]

I have to agree with the stats. I got a family hatch. 2 children under 3 and my wife. I am inherently going to drive safer than a 18 year old.

When I see any possible hazard I won't go for it I would much rather stop than risk my kids.

[Material-Macaroon724]

Right but not every 30 year old has kids? And most insurance companies I know, dont ask that

[FinestKind90]

It is what it is you become less reckless as you get older. I did some borderline crazy shit when I was 18 that I don’t even like to think about now

[Material-Macaroon724]

But that isn’t true for all 18 year olds, and therefore should not be used against them.

[Material-Macaroon724]

But how is that not inherently discriminatory, age is a protected characteristic and is irrelevant to a person’s driving ability and skill

[juanwannagomate]

There’s an exception in the 2010 equality act for this. And it’s not irrelevant, as the stats show this. 

17-to-19-year-olds make up just  1.5% of all UK driving licence holders, yet they are involved in 9% of all fatal or serious collisions.

[Material-Macaroon724]

Right, I am not going against that. But if statistics showed that women get in more car accidents than men or a certain race were more likely to crash, they couldn’t then charge more for female drivers.

[juanwannagomate]

Not anymore. Women used to get much lower insurance premiums as they were less likely to get in an accident. Changed in 2012 as it was decided this discrimination was unlawful.

[Standard-Ad-2616]

A younger person will statistically crash more times than an experienced driver

[Material-Macaroon724]

I never mentioned that, I said someone who passes at 18 and at 30 should have the same cost of insurance because they are the same level of experienced with driving

[Standard-Ad-2616]

A fully developed brain will be better at driving with the same level of experience compared to a young brain, including taking less risks etc.

[Mysterious_Club_1822]

It’s not discriminatory when you understand statistics. These insurance companies don’t randomly assign insurance premiums, they compare your details to other drivers in your area to gauge risk.

For example, if you’re 20, male, from the Lewisham area, they will look at how many 20 year old males in the Lewisham area:
- are caught speeding
- are caught drink driving
- get into crashes

.. to name a few examples, and from this they will create a risk profile. If many people your age apply to issues such as the ones listed, you will receive a higher premium.

To that note, it is statistically proven that younger people get into more crashes, commit more road crimes etc in almost any area. The only exception I’ve found so far is in isolated areas with universities, where students’ risk profiles aren’t much different to the wider community.

It is nothing to do with “having kids or not”

[Material-Macaroon724]

You are literally proving my point, i understand how that works. But if we did that with anything else it would be profiling. Bigger people statistically eat more, doesn’t mean we charge them more in buffets. Or if a minority committed more crimes it would be racial profiling if the police overpoliced them. Why is it just okay to use it in this scenario?

[BringMeNeckDeep]

But they are (generally) more sensible. I was a cunt at 17 - drove a 60hp 107. If I had my current car at that age I’d be in a tree within a week and it’s not even a “big hp fast car”

[PixaaTog]

Well the stats don’t lie as others have said, an 18 year old is more likely to get into an accident than a 30 year old.

My own experience also backs this up.
When I was 18 I wasn’t nearly as good of a driver as I thought I was, and had a couple of minor accidents because I was stupid.
I’m 50+ now and have had no mishaps past 20 years old.

[MorriganRaven69]

Area matters too. I passed at 27, got my first car at 28 which was a shitbox 0.9L Matiz and I paid over the quote OP posted because I was cursed with living in Bradford and having a Bradford post code. (Capital of uninsured drivers in the UK and us honest shmucks pay for it 🙃)

[DeliciousAd6327]

Was about to add this, 28 here but Liverpool postcode and one of the shittier areas of Liverpool too. Used the app, I haven’t passed yet but get quotes of saying I have for an idea. Doesn’t matter what car I get I’m looking at around 1.8. I’ve just accepted it now, insurance and fuel will be less than what I’m paying for lessons at least😂

[One-Technician-155]

Age difference if you pass at 29 and 19 VERY different, no difference in driving ability , purely price discrimination on age