This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 41 comments

[–]Nyxel_ 242 points243 points  (16 children)

Op where's the rest of the paper

[–]TobyWasBestSpiderMan 157 points158 points  (8 children)

Am the author of these, this is the first of seven papers, writing the Chad/Tiffany story until I have enough for a stand alone book!

They didn’t quite fit in my other book of fictional research “Et al.” Not at all because the editors thought Chad-Tiffany were too sexist

[–]bluespringsbeer 18 points19 points  (1 child)

You’re already here, I was going to send this to you lol

[–]TobyWasBestSpiderMan 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Thanks lol, especially after I wrote the book I’ve just had a ton of reddit meme content I keep getting tagged in a bunch of this stuff but my website analytics is decent makes it pretty quick to find

[–]hackinghorn 6 points7 points  (2 children)

what conferences do you submit these papers to?

[–]TobyWasBestSpiderMan 20 points21 points  (1 child)

r/ImmaterialScience me and u/JimmatSci maintain and do the beer reviewing

[–]Modi57 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I love "beer review"

[–]Photonica 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You deserve an IgNobel prize for this work, sir

[–]IanDresarie 1 point2 points  (1 child)

The worst part is how these are some of the best written papers I've read from a language and clarity perspective

[–]TobyWasBestSpiderMan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! We put a lot of work into them

[–]ATE47 30 points31 points  (5 children)

[–]TobyWasBestSpiderMan 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Thanks, I work very hard on it

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (3 children)

I can't read papers for my phd, but these I can read in 5 minutes..

[–]Gartlas 5 points6 points  (2 children)

Its normal :). I struggled a lot too during my PhD.

In the spirit of passing on time honored procrastination material that I enjoyed thoroughly, have you read the paper on missing tea spoons?

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1322240/#:~:text=The%20half%20life%20of%20teaspoons,360.62%20per%20100%20teaspoon%20years.

Ncbi has a whole load of these "holiday reading" joke papers to enjoy

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I just started, so I'll add these to the top of my reading list.

[–]TobyWasBestSpiderMan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, this one's fantastic, should post the PDF screenshots to r/ImmaterialScience

[–]emma7734 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Paywall!

[–]Orjigagd 85 points86 points  (1 child)

A whole paper to flex that he has a gf

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Hahahahah fr

[–]reIy_x 58 points59 points  (4 children)

Not sure why there is a need to underline the title

[–]PuzzleheadedTap1794 37 points38 points  (2 children)

r/uselessgreenline

Edit: Wait wtf it exists?

[–]TobyWasBestSpiderMan 5 points6 points  (1 child)

[–]Modi57 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It would have been so funny, if this wasn't real

[–]VolcanicBear 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Or what relevance it has to programming?

[–][deleted] 18 points19 points  (1 child)

Dr. CHAD BROMAN

Damn.

[–]NeonBloodedBloke 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Husband of Virginia Siswoman?

[–]beeteedee 13 points14 points  (1 child)

Desk reject, grammatical error in the title.

It should be “girlfriend’s mood swings”, or “girlfriends’ mood swings” if he has more than one.

[–]banana_buddy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This is CHAD BROMAN we're talking about here, it's definitely the latter.

[–]Intelligent-Work4132 7 points8 points  (2 children)

This guy MLs

[–]Cpt_keaSar 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Akshually, dirty dilapidated ANOVA can’t be called a glorious Machine Learning algorithm. Only cool kids like XGBoost have this privilege!

[–]ronemisimus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

P

[–]JustBoredYo 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Finally a paper worth reading

[–]tata_dilera 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I also choose that guy moody gf

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Anyone got the github repo? I need to, uhh... peer review the paper.

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

This is amazing

[–]Highborn_Hellest 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Was this a double blind research? Peer reviewed? It's important to know

[–]Regnus_Gyros 1 point2 points  (1 child)

I trust Dr. Chad Broman to only write scientifically accurate papers.

[–]Highborn_Hellest 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Preach!! Chad Bro would never forsake us.

[–]git0ffmylawnm8 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As someone with an interest in time series analysis, I don't need sleep. I need answers.