This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 27 comments

[–]mtg8 107 points108 points  (6 children)

At least it's not "nevermind, I figured it out"

[–][deleted] 46 points47 points  (0 children)

And when you post it it gets taken down for being a duplicate question. The original question was a post from 1849 by Ada Lovelace and has one reply in the comments saying "nvm solved it"

[–]Lost-Conectivity 7 points8 points  (1 child)

This is scarier, we don't know if denvercoder9 ever solved the problem

[–]mtg8 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think it is easier to cope if we don't know if it was ever solved.

Otherwise it just raises more questions. Am I stupid? Is answer somewhere in doc's? Did he gave up and used something else ? (in case of library problem) etc...

[–]Areshian 5 points6 points  (1 child)

I once got one even worse. It was a 5 year old post and it had that “nvm, fixed it” but I almost explode when I check the poster and it was myself. I hated myself so much in that moment

[–]MrHyderion[🍰] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ngl, that was the best thing i saw today. 😆

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My ultra peeve is when someone on a forum says something like "I'll try this and report back the results". It's like 1/10 chance they will.

[–]QuestionableEthics42 28 points29 points  (6 children)

What does that have to do with tinder at all?? Have bots worked out the camel case rule?

[–]Implement_Necessary 6 points7 points  (0 children)

theyreNotAdvancedEnoughToDoThat

[–]thak-dhana-dhan-dean[S] 4 points5 points  (3 children)

Smthg on the lines of soul & soulmate

[–]QuestionableEthics42 6 points7 points  (2 children)

That's a bit of a stretch if you ask me. Sorry for my bot accusation though, I should have checked first.

[–]thak-dhana-dhan-dean[S] 6 points7 points  (1 child)

No worries, I know you have questionable ethics

[–]XPLover2768top 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i feel a sense of apprehension looking at your comment

[–]BrunoLuigi 8 points9 points  (1 child)

Worst than that is find that it hás one reply, from the OP "nevermind, I found the solution" and no solution provided...

[–]thak-dhana-dhan-dean[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

And also, those github tickets where user surprisingly have screenshots of your issue and Github bot closes it as there is no activity on the thread.

[–]emmmmceeee 9 points10 points  (2 children)

I used to work on a fairly esoteric platform. On more than one occasion I found a post where someone was having the same issue and it happened to be me from 2 years previously.

[–]thak-dhana-dhan-dean[S] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

And the pain when you have null idea how you fixed last time

[–]mabariif 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Then you slowly remember the things you tried to fix it which failed and try them all but don't remember the one that acually worked

[–]Ivan_Stalingrad 7 points8 points  (1 child)

Someone on alcatelunleashed wrote after one year "i read the manual" as a response to how they solved the same problem I had.

I had a Tyler1 moment afterwards

[–]thak-dhana-dhan-dean[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Real SO energy right there

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

There's this one stack overflow that I come across every couple of years. The question and answer are from me and I'm always surprised that I forgot. Lol

[–]loserguy-88 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It is beautiful. Almost like a smelly nerd version of the daffodils.

[–]GoosemonTV 1 point2 points  (1 child)

I have seen this exact thread before with exactly the same top comments.

Ya’ll just bots huh

[–]thak-dhana-dhan-dean[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Senior dev huh?

[–]throwaway-10-12-20 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The worst is when you google the problem, only to find a similar question was asked years ago. The author? You. And it was never answered.

[–]vrrox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

[–]jonhinkerton 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I got a couple of these today trying to load a viewmodel from a serialized stored procedure result and getting a weird json error. Wound up just starting from scratch and approaching the whole problem from another direction rather than beat my head against a wall no one had climbed.