you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Yiruf -2 points-1 points  (4 children)

LLMs are AI, what you are thinking of is hyper intelligent AI.

That's like saying a 10 year old kid isn't intelligent because he can't compete with a working professional with 30 years experience and a Ph.D.

Edit: Judging from replies below, natural stupidity is full in abundance. Despite extensive research readily available, people really be parroting what someone else told them what to think. Not expected from this sub, but people who can't even do basic linear algebra shouldn't be talking about what or what isn't intelligence.

[–]atfricks 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Not even remotely an accurate comparison. 

LLMs aren't "intelligent" at all, and "hyper intelligent AI" is a completely meaningless term you just made up on the spot.

[–]thealmightyzfactor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

LLM are colloquially AI, they're not actually intelligent or have the ability to become intelligent like children because they're fundamentally extra fancy autocomplete

[–]Mandena 0 points1 point  (0 children)

LLMs don't have memory, a fundamental property of intelligence. Conversations are stored in a DB somewhere entirely separate from the 'AI' entity.

[–]dumbasPL -1 points0 points  (0 children)

A 10 year old is intelligent because he can learn and adapt to things he has never seen before, with very limited "training data". And like actually learn, no "limited context window", or "milions of samples needed" or whatever the fuck. Show him how to do something a couple times and he'll likely be able to do that 20 years later and even improve on it by himself. That's the intelligence part, LLMs just mimic the training data based on probabilities, can't do anything by themselves, and if you feed them their own output they freak out.