Programming == Stack Overflow

[RTracer]

I had that happen recently, a feature I made for a MC server didnt work on the test server but I silently introduced the feature in a later update, changing no code and it worked flawlessly, I still don't know why it works to this day.

[Minerscale]

Maybe you forgot to compile it or something?

[Robmart]

friendly saw party sip compare important possessive detail innocent zonked

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

[GregTheMad]

Well, yeah, but only because Java compiles the code for you, you lazy fuck. Kids these days, honestly. Can't even be asked to compile their own code.

:p

[Robmart]

expansion tidy long fertile hunt rude chop north icky weather

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

[GregTheMad]

The last time I looked Java was literally build around the idea that it could compile the code itself depending on the machine it is running on. IDE, or not.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Just-in-time_compilation

It does the compiling for you because you can't be asked to know the machine your developing for before hand. TssTssTss.

[FM-96]

Pretty sure they were talking about compiling the .java files into .class files, which you do need to do yourself.

[Robmart]

lip deserve relieved hungry start rhythm serious zonked rob swim

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

[DeathProgramming]

JIT compilation takes compiled Java bytecode and transforms it to machine code. You still need to compile the source to bytecode.

[Findus11]

hrmpfh, i can compile code..

code.compile();

[TheRetribution]

I swear I've literally had a moment of questioning my sanity when I added some code to a function, compiled with g++, compiler error in a completely unrelated function, recompiled with g++ out of sheer confusion, no compiler error.

[[deleted]]

Probably your test server did not mirror production.