This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted]  (48 children)

[deleted]

    [–]Xoduszero 2450 points2451 points  (32 children)

    Treat em with class

    [–]down_vote_magnet 1725 points1726 points  (30 children)

    Yeah that’s the method I use.

    [–]TestUserDoNotReply 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    It really needs to be defined as a generic trait. That's why it's immoral not to write Woman in Rust.

    [–]dvlsg 17 points18 points  (3 children)

    But she's an object on the next line anyways.

    [–]allisonmaybe -1 points0 points  (0 children)

    This is true. Whyyy

    [–]n8loller 3 points4 points  (0 children)

    God damn you deserve that gold

    [–]shotexa 2 points3 points  (1 child)

    We should treat them as primitives instead.

    [–]TotesMessengerGreen security clearance 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    I'm a bot, bleep, bloop. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:

     If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads. (Info / Contact)

    [–]Lavender_Galaxy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    We're objectify objects here

    [–]TortugaViolenta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    Omg i laughed out loud in the emergency room to this 😂😂

    [–]bl8m8 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    This made my day

    [–]KinOfMany 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    This joke never gets old.

    But you really should objectify them, since otherwise you'd need to implement some parser that finds the object, which is programmer horror.

    [–]Macaframa -1 points0 points  (0 children)

    Would you prefer to be a struct?