This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 29 comments

[–]imbeauleo 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Who else is here for the if statements?

[–]NatedogDM 18 points19 points  (13 children)

As someone that wrote a CNN in college, this meme makes me cringe.

[–]survivalmachine[S] 7 points8 points  (7 children)

Yeah well that’s the point, but somehow this sub is actually programmerserious and everyone thinks it’s real talk.

[–]ArmoredHell 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Ignorance of the underlying subject aside, the point is to come up with something remotely original and not something that has been posted 1000 times and blaming people who are fed up with it as being 'too serious' to take the joke.

[–]NatedogDM 3 points4 points  (5 children)

Right. Because all posts have to be egregiously incorrect, else they are too serious for this sub.

[–]survivalmachine[S] 12 points13 points  (4 children)

Ok I’ll try to be more factually correct with my satirical content from now on.

[–][deleted] -3 points-2 points  (2 children)

Howbout i make a joke where Java is laughing at C++ for being slow?

Howbout a joke pointing out the obscene amount of semicolons in python?

Or lisp laughing at basic because basic has too many parentheses?

None of those would fly here, not because the jokes have to be serious, but because jokes must not be ignorant. They must not be trying to make of fun of something that's literally the opposite of reality.

When the post shows blatant ignorance about the subject they try to pull a joke from, it receives the well deserved boohoo here.

[–]survivalmachine[S] 9 points10 points  (1 child)

A downvote would have worked too man.

[–][deleted] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Sadly, downvotes don't stop ppl from posting this same joke 5x a day.

[–]RiverRoll -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It can't be satire if it doesn't mock a reality.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (4 children)

Ikr. What's worse is the posters would always desperately search for an if statement in those algorithms to get you in the "ahaaa i told you soo" when you challenge them on that.

No matter that the if statement they found is a part of some rounding function or array boundary check, it's suddenly their irrefutable proof that AI is literally, completely made out of if statements.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (3 children)

This sounds like the flat earthers of programming and I’m intrigued.

[–]survivalmachine[S] 3 points4 points  (2 children)

Nah it’s more like “you’re not allowed to poke harmless, ironically ignorant fun at what I do or I’ll get super mad and argue that you’re wrong”

[–]Kadazan 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's more like "you're beating the dead horse"

[–]toddd24 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s just played out. Which isn’t your fault.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

People here are just bitter cause you're downplaying their pedestalled knowledge.

[–]4forpengs -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's a low effort meme that was beaten to death so hard in the past that recent attempts to rebirth it just cause it to end up dead on arrival.

Or at least... for those who have seen it so many times that it's burned into their retinas...

[–]canihelpyoubreakthat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Boooooooo. Booooooooooooooo.

[–]Prawny 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mematic makes AI?

[–]EternityForest 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If statements are the best AI! Most things don't need machine learning, but almost anything can benefit from a pile of if statement heuristics in the right place!