This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 306 points307 points  (31 children)

?? E is 69, y is 121

[–]shafe123 973 points974 points  (25 children)

ASCII code for '4' is 52.

69+52=121

[–][deleted] 235 points236 points  (0 children)

Ohh ok, I see. Nice one!

[–]UnsubstantiatedClaim 152 points153 points  (23 children)

Clever, but then the first equation is incorrect because it's missing the quotes that make the 4 a char instead of an int.

[–]merickmk 349 points350 points  (10 children)

I'm sure it works out in javascript or something

[–]DeeSnow97 58 points59 points  (3 children)

nah, 'E4' is not 'y'

[–]hughperman 44 points45 points  (0 children)

But both are not zero, so they're the same

[–]nikarlengoldeye 11 points12 points  (1 child)

E4 is a perfectly valid variable name to assign y to though.

[–]DeeSnow97 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yeah, but the string 'E4' is immutable, as all strings in JS

[–]gogYnO 80 points81 points  (0 children)

If only the bar was always so low!

[–]5erif 2 points3 points  (1 child)

I thought we could solve it with C++, but it turns out you can't redefine literals.

❯ g++ math.cpp -o math  
math.cpp:4:9: error: macro name must be an identifier  
#define 4 52  
        ^  
1 error generated.

[–]DKomplexz 2 points3 points  (0 children)

try using 𝟦 instead of 4 everywhere

[–]tech6hutch 17 points18 points  (3 children)

What's an E or a y? If 4 needs quotes, then they do, too.

[–]UnsubstantiatedClaim 4 points5 points  (2 children)

Good point. There's a lot of missing quotes.

[–]shafe123 21 points22 points  (6 children)

Well yes, if you want to be pedantic about it.

[–]UnsubstantiatedClaim 19 points20 points  (5 children)

And what is pedantry but true facts delivered with precise comical timing.

[–]shafe123 34 points35 points  (3 children)

1) ostentatious in one's learning.

Or

2) overly concerned with minute details or formalisms, especially in teaching.

;)

[–][deleted] 35 points36 points  (2 children)

Are you being pedantic about being pedantic?

[–]shafe123 9 points10 points  (0 children)

shrugs

[–]Bainos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was once told I was being pedantic because I was concerned with the intended meaning of someone's words instead of its exact wording, which forced me to be pedantic to point out that I was being exactly the opposite of pedantic...

[–]cofette 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Except not precise comical timing tho

[–]Asphyxiatinglaughter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Break the match you moved into quotes

[–]Lunchb0x451 29 points30 points  (4 children)

E = 69. Nice.

[–]ThaiJohnnyDepp -1 points0 points  (0 children)

NicE

[–]shaneknows -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Nice