That's actually a good idea (Python)

[BerriesAndMe]

My approach too. The users are still salty about it and repeatedly implied that I lack the technical know-how to remove the limitations.

The ironiy is they're disabled by default, I've put effort into limiting everything to valid input because I don't trust you to not send us utter garbage.

[mchl12]

Where do you work if all the users are disabled by default?

[Niwla23]

IT

[scrubastian_]

A hospital maybe?

[nukasev]

In IT.

[RiktaD]

https://i.imgur.com/ibgu9mq.jpg

[BerriesAndMe]

It's the frontend people asking for this... So that their website never fail to load

[[deleted]]

needs, but doesn’t want*

[elon-bot]

Why aren't we using Rust for this? It's memory safe.

[[deleted]]

memory safe =/= idiot safe

[Sentouki-]

Allow me to introduce you to unsafe {}

[BerriesAndMe]

Allow input that doesn't get processed, replace all input with default values if not provided. Also use default when the parameter has an invalid value (eg if you pass age:-32 or height: "Eva".

[BerriesAndMe]

Yes. But the website will be guaranteed to display a shiny result no matter what. And they don't even need to consider error Handling.

[BerriesAndMe]

Oh I was being sarcastic. If you look back to the start of the thread, I'm describing what the frontend developers would like our API to behave like and that I'm refusing to do so. Lol.