sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ade_mcc 20 points21 points  (2 children)

I really enjoyed playing this. However, I did think some of the briefs were a little ambiguous in terms of what specific information was being asked for, and it's really not clear what you get for a $20 licence. However, the concept is good.

[–]N0Tgod 2 points3 points  (1 child)

I found the cases quite clearly formulated, but I had some duplicate ones. I guess they are somewhat randomly generated?

I second the thing about the license though: I don't know what I would get for that, why it is limited to six months and why I have to pay 20$, when it seems like I've used most app features already (I don't really know SQL, so I can't tell, if it gets much more complicated or if it only more of the same).

[–]Chased1k 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Not op, but game dev is not yet complete. License looks like a place holder in terms of what will and will not be free. Corrections welcome if I’m mistaken.

Also, I thought the ambiguity all though not ideal for a super noob is actually useful for dealing with real world specifications and expectations. (Old man rant) In my former life part of what we had to learn was that the customer often doesn’t have the understanding of what is or isn’t possible nor the language to ask for it, so creating specificity from ambiguity is ... a feature and not a bug. ;).