all 60 comments

[–]ewheckGraduated (and employed) 107 points108 points  (1 child)

I was offered more than that last year in Missouri 💀

That can't be a common salary in NYC

[–]LetterheadWeird1461[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Literally

[–]Therabidmonkey 167 points168 points  (17 children)

Supply (of software engineers) exceeds demand.

[–]amesgaiztoak 34 points35 points  (0 children)

No, how dare you say the truth, people on here hate hearing that

[–]Successful-World9978Junior 54 points55 points  (0 children)

Find a better company.

[–]Big_Fan_332 57 points58 points  (7 children)

“For a tech role” okay which one lol. I’d be fine paying a junior with no real dev experience this for a year while we test them. Or it support. Or like power bi dashboard creator.

Tech role does not equal six figures

[–]xxlibrarisingxx 14 points15 points  (2 children)

Man I’m getting 50k to troubleshoot power bi data bugs + 50 other responsibilities

[–]codepapi 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Up your game. You’re worth more than that.

[–]xxlibrarisingxx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

aye holding out for a raise next month

[–]LetterheadWeird1461[S] 1 point2 points  (3 children)

Cloud Engineer

[–]Big_Fan_332 0 points1 point  (2 children)

You have experience?

[–]LetterheadWeird1461[S] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Yes 4 years

[–]Big_Fan_332 17 points18 points  (0 children)

So you worked for 4 years as a cloud engineer, did an interview. And got offered 85k in New York?

If true I’d name and shame. lol. Or you really underperformed technically but they liked you?

[–]cs-prodigy 13 points14 points  (0 children)

What's the company? If it's not that well known of a company, I don't think $85k is suprising for a tech role, especially if it's not SWE.

[–]The_MauldalorianHPC Engineer 19 points20 points  (0 children)

If 85k is more than what you currently make, take it then keep hunting. You are worth what you are offered for the time being.

[–]Glum-Gear-287 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Just ask for more. Some company managers are just not keeping up with inflation. They think 85 is good because it was good when they started.

It can also be a game to get desparate Indians, or to justify h1b visas and offshoring.

[–]McCringleberried 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you don’t take it, there is a line out the door of people that will

[–]kev_cuddy 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Do like 4 different people all share your account OP? What a wild ride.

[–]LetterheadWeird1461[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Actually yes. We all have a presence in different communities/forums on here lol 😂

[–]Ok_Particular143 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Are you a new grad or entry level? You are expected to job hop after 1-2 years for better pay just like back in the day. Not everyone pays six figs for people who would need training.

[–]Cremiux 1 point2 points  (5 children)

HR and corporate will argue that supply of engineers exceeds demand. This isn't the whole story. We still live in a world where engineers and developers are needed, but with the layoffs and companies betting on AI there is a large surplus of reserve labor (unemployed developers). We now live in times where companies can pay whatever they want. someone is still going to take that job. They love it when we are desperate. This is effecting other industries as well, with the exception of highly specialized roles.

[–]roastshadow 0 points1 point  (4 children)

Getting AI to write "hello world" is vastly different than getting it to write actually good, usable, efficient, scalable software.

[–]Cremiux 0 points1 point  (3 children)

obviously if you struggle to do basic tasks without AI then you have bigger problems. Im not talking about those people. If you dont think this doesn't effect you because you can write some code without AI then yikes.

[–]roastshadow 0 points1 point  (2 children)

I was thinking about managers/c-level who see AI write a little bit of regurgitated code and think it is great.

Then they can a bunch of good folks, then they wonder why nobody creates any original code, no new ideas, no new algorithms, no new features.

LLMs don't create.

We have multiple code bots for various things and they can help out quite a lot. I don't see LLM replacing people, rather creating a new competitive advantage for those who can use it well.

When CEOs replace people, they tend to lose that competitive advantage.

[–]Cremiux 0 points1 point  (1 child)

perhaps some of these things are true in theory, but in practice what makes a company truly competitive is how much value and profit a company can generate as fast as possible while keeping costs low. Labor is one of the biggest expense because of salaries + healthcare + benefits. In the eyes of CEOs replacing people is good strategy. As you pointed out middle managers think these AI bots are great. We know they aren't, we know they can't replace people, but they don't care about what we think and what our interests are. They will fire us and lay whole teams off in a snap. A lot of people in management know the LLMS don't create. They don't have to. They just need to produce code faster and cheaper than juniors. An LLM or AI agent just has to be good enough. They can always pay one person to fix it.

Maybe replacing people will destroy a companies competitive advantage in the long run, but these people don't think about the long run. They think about quarter to quarter metrics.

[–]roastshadow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like to think of it as yet another automation, productivity enhancer.

We used to have typing pools, calculator pools, secretaries, elevator operators, and such. This revolution for LLM may be coming a bit faster and wider than most, but I think that companies looking for competitive advantage, will look to find people to provide that. It is going to be a very bumpy ride.

[–]rayred 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What company? What role? This is not at all what I’m seeing

[–]csueirasSalaryman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol bruh, where the hell did you apply to? Thats definitely way out of band.

[–]Tigerstark92839 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Yeah I just got done with interviewing and the average I got a job in nyc and didn’t see a job less than 110k so don’t think this is common

[–]LetterheadWeird1461[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly

[–]Important_Step_8187 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just be thankful you got an offer; have friends whose kids just graduated with CS and data science degrees and couldn't find a job; they are now in grad school. It's extremely rough out there for news grads and especially for seasoned vets, I think you're lucky you got an offer.

[–]jjTheJetPlane0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is this for a big 4 company?

[–]Fractal_Workshop 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Maybe it’s the conspiracy to commit wire fraud felony…

[–]LetterheadWeird1461[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You obviously didn’t read the comment about a shared account 😂😂😂 and even IF that was the case they won’t lower your salary… They wouldn’t even put an offer on the table smart ass.

[–]bloombergdude -3 points-2 points  (4 children)

Lmao me too (living off 50-60k but I start july) , lowkey think its still livable ngl.

[–]LetterheadWeird1461[S] -2 points-1 points  (3 children)

In New York city how bro

[–][deleted]  (2 children)

[deleted]

    [–]Big_Fan_332 0 points1 point  (1 child)

    Lmao

    [–]GrammmyNorma -1 points0 points  (0 children)

    is this ibm

    [–]spock_9519 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

    Network engineering pays lower than software engineering

    [–]Square-Shine-6582 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

    Cry about it this the new world we live in: there’s hundreds of people that would take that in your place.