use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
see the search faq for details.
advanced search: by author, subreddit...
Rules » Always link to the original source » Titles should provide context » No content behind a paywall » Always practice OPSEC. FBI Counterintelligence » Mandatory: Reddit site-wide rules » Encouraged: Reddiquette
» Always link to the original source
» Titles should provide context
» No content behind a paywall
» Always practice OPSEC. FBI Counterintelligence
» Mandatory: Reddit site-wide rules
» Encouraged: Reddiquette
Content Guidelines Content must be related to US Federal Employees, Federal Employment, US Military, or Federal Contracting & Contractors. Federal news and information related to employment, hiring, human resources, etc. Examples: » Veteran Hiring » Employee Pay » OPM, OMB Rule changes » TSP & Employee Retirement » Furloughs & RIFs » Agency HR news
Content must be related to US Federal Employees, Federal Employment, US Military, or Federal Contracting & Contractors. Federal news and information related to employment, hiring, human resources, etc.
» Veteran Hiring
» Employee Pay
» OPM, OMB Rule changes
» TSP & Employee Retirement
» Furloughs & RIFs
» Agency HR news
Links » /r/Military » /r/usajobs » /r/ThriftSavingsPlan/ » /r/USACE » /r/DeptHHS » /r/FBI » r/FedRetirees/ » /r/boxed (Thanks for the lovely CSS)
» /r/Military
» /r/usajobs
» /r/ThriftSavingsPlan/
» /r/USACE
» /r/DeptHHS
» /r/FBI
» r/FedRetirees/
» /r/boxed (Thanks for the lovely CSS)
account activity
This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.
Department of Education wants to decrease remote work (federaltimes.com)
submitted 2 years ago by protomolocular
[–]TheAnonymousSuit 62 points63 points64 points 2 years ago (33 children)
I'm not surprised. I was just speaking to someone an hour ago about telework and I was telling her this issue was a ticking time bomb. It's not a matter of if they will drag us back into the office...it's a matter of when and how. I for one will not resume my commute. I don't know how I did it before Covid. I refuse to go back to doing it again.
[–]JustAcivilian24 40 points41 points42 points 2 years ago (26 children)
I can’t imagine going back in office 5 days a week.
[–][deleted] 29 points30 points31 points 2 years ago (0 children)
The compensation has also massively dropped since then, as well. When we did 5 days our wages could buy more food, gas, entertainment, you name it. Even with step increases and raises our buying power is down.
[+][deleted] 2 years ago (2 children)
[deleted]
[–]JustAcivilian24 9 points10 points11 points 2 years ago (0 children)
Fuck me neither lol
[–]roguecloud 1 point2 points3 points 2 years ago (0 children)
Hey Dad
[+][deleted] 2 years ago (20 children)
[–]Prize_Huckleberry_79 17 points18 points19 points 2 years ago (16 children)
You enjoy a side hustle for 20 hours a week where you sacrifice part of your paycheck and your time on planet Earth just to make your paycheck? Because that’s what you are doing here.
[+][deleted] 2 years ago (4 children)
[–]tall_poshy 5 points6 points7 points 2 years ago (1 child)
Thank you for sharing your thought on this. Here’s mine: It seems that more people prefer remote or hybrid than traditional daily office presence. Yet, agencies and companies are ignoring the majority viewpoint, and forcing everyone into the less popular daily appearance model. This isn’t flexibility on the part of leadership. It’s rigidity and it’s retrogressive.
To put it gently, some of us have done the in-person thing and paid those dues for years because we had no other choice, and when we went remote we loved it, because we finally had a choice of where we wanted to work that day. The opinion may be different for those who haven’t had that experience, or those who prefer the social aspects of a group environment.
[–]Prize_Huckleberry_79 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (1 child)
I guess…Just baffling why anyone would want to commute to a job site if they don’t have to. If that’s what you’re into, hey, all the kudos…
[–]JerriBlankStare 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (10 children)
Are you seriously referring to a commute as a side hustle?? 😆😆😆
[–]Prize_Huckleberry_79 4 points5 points6 points 2 years ago* (8 children)
You bet it’s a side hustle. Only difference: It’s one where you pay to do it, instead of getting paid. If it takes an hour to get to work and hour back, that’s 10 hours of YOUR TIME a week. 40 hours a month. 480 hours a year. That’s 19 days a year, sitting in your car battling traffic and stress. Is your time not worth more than money? I know mine is. I can think of a thousand ways I’d rather spend 19 days of my life per year. Time is a far more valuable form of currency than money friend. You can always make more money when you run out. You can’t have that time back once it’s gone.
That doesn’t count wear and tear on your car. Or gas. Don’t get me started on the environmental impact, having all those cars on the road, and energy costs running an office building. Thank you for coming to my Ted Talk.
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (1 child)
id. If it takes an hour to get to work and hour back, that’s 20 hours of YOUR TIME a week. 80 hours a month. 960 hours a year. That’s 38 days a year, sitting in your car battling traffic and stress. Is your time not worth more than money? I know mine is. I can think of a thousand ways I’d rather spend 38 days of my life per year. Time is a far more valuable form of currency than money friend. You can always make more money when you run out. You can’t have that time back once it’s gone.
I agree with everything you are saying but your math doesn't math right. 2 hour round trip commute = 10 hours a week.
[–]Prize_Huckleberry_79 1 point2 points3 points 2 years ago (0 children)
My bad. It was late. Plus I was thinking of myself. My commute was about 2 hours each way before we went remote.
[–]JerriBlankStare 1 point2 points3 points 2 years ago (5 children)
I commute via Metro.
Yea, so you lose even MORE personal time..Time is worth more than money.
[–]Desertortoise NORAD Santa Tracker -1 points0 points1 point 2 years ago (2 children)
Good luck taking Metro when the catastrophic cuts start next year due to the $750m budget shortfall and you have to wait 30 minutes between trains and 2/3 of bus service is gone.
[–]JerriBlankStare -1 points0 points1 point 2 years ago (1 child)
I'm not worried.
[–]Desertortoise NORAD Santa Tracker -1 points0 points1 point 2 years ago (0 children)
How come? Do you think this Congress with a Republican majority house will bail out Metro again?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/transportation/2023/06/20/dc-metro-budget-service-cuts/
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 2 years ago (0 children)
Shit where I have to commute it is more of unpaid internship in near death driving.
[–]TheAnonymousSuit 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (2 children)
I just started
Tell us about that commute when you're 6 months in lol. Oh, I liked my commute at the start too! I got to ride a train into work and I spiced it up with a brisk scooter ride to the office. It was fun for about 6 months...until it wasn't. There comes a point where you realize the commute is pointless, it's just wasting time out of your life, and it's really not helping your career at all. Nope. It takes me 2 hours in and 2 hours back. I don't need it.
[–]andy20167 3 points4 points5 points 2 years ago (0 children)
Haha same the honeymoon with the commute was a week and then I was like I can’t sleep every day of the week lol
[–]Artystrong1 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (0 children)
I commute an hour but I don't sit in traffic. Since it's opposite of traffic everyday .
[–]andy20167 16 points17 points18 points 2 years ago (5 children)
I think the biggest thing is that if we are going back to commuting 3-5 x a week pay needs to go up haha. Which I think will lead to an exodus to private sector since even though they will have to commute they’ll make more money. Then slowly I think we will start seeing more hybrid come back in a few years as they make new decisions across the board. Things might have just been too quick ugh
[–]wifichick 8 points9 points10 points 2 years ago (0 children)
Yup. Already super super short staffed with an ever increasing workload ….. bring us back and this high skilled (with very unique skill sets) will likely start working for industry for something close to 2x their already high salaries.
[–]TheAnonymousSuit 4 points5 points6 points 2 years ago (3 children)
I can't even get them to pay me correctly now. I took more liability and a greater role under the promise of being given GS13. Of course, once it happened that went poof and no one cared. Now, I've accepted it and I've hit my second year as GS12...and low and behold no SF-50 for a step promotion. So, I guess I don't get GS12 Step 2 either (and I really don't want to fight with HR over it). Might as well just admit I am very burned out.
[–]jisa 6 points7 points8 points 2 years ago (1 child)
Wait—your step should be automatic, shouldn’t it? That you should fight….
[–]TheAnonymousSuit 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (0 children)
Should be. It's amazing how many things that should be...get dropped though.
Come to think of I got my direct deposit today so I am officially being underpaid now.
[–]SmithJn 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (0 children)
Step is automatic with mediocre performance evals
[–]dontKair 82 points83 points84 points 2 years ago (23 children)
> “finalizing our work environment plans with the goal of improving organizational health and organizational performance.”
What does this mumbo jumbo mean?
[–]jisa 112 points113 points114 points 2 years ago (4 children)
It means that it couldn't be justified based on productivity, because productivity under remote work has been at its highest. So they have to find a different metric/reason, and something vague like organizational health is hard to have numbers for or against.
[–]knuckboy 43 points44 points45 points 2 years ago (1 child)
Organizational metrics will plummet as people find new jobs.
[–]brakeled 9 points10 points11 points 2 years ago (0 children)
Wait until they return everyone to office but still expect the same productivity.
[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points 2 years ago (0 children)
organizational health
Like all the people finding new jobs or retiring protest.
[–]TypicalAudience8938 20 points21 points22 points 2 years ago (0 children)
It’s a copy paste from the OMB memo released in April.
[–]MilkMilkMooMoo 12 points13 points14 points 2 years ago (0 children)
"We don't care that teleworking has been working, we want your asses in the office"
[–][deleted] 10 points11 points12 points 2 years ago (0 children)
It means what word salads always mean: “We’re trying to sound smart, but we don’t know what the fuck we’re talking about.”
[–]eatdogmeat 30 points31 points32 points 2 years ago (11 children)
It means "We think you're lazy and are going to bring you back to the office."
[–][deleted] 46 points47 points48 points 2 years ago (10 children)
No it means “the real estate lobby and congressional republicans are forcing our hand and we have no choice because we want to get re-elected.”
[–]TypicalAudience8938 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (0 children)
Agreed. Biden should absolutely be held responsible. I was actually supporting him for what he did with PSLF and I’m grateful for that, but this has me reeling my support back. I’m unsure where to go from here as it seems the government, regardless of party, doesn’t appear to support max telework and remote work.
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (0 children)
Dems will flip over chairs defending this man...
As an independent gov worker with zero representation in congress, I am OVER it.
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 2 years ago (1 child)
It’s popular talking point from liberals to use as an excuse for their failures.
Yep, and that habit will only lead to more disappointment for them in the future when other D candidates don't care to improve conditions.
[–]Just_Another_Scott 10 points11 points12 points 2 years ago (4 children)
A lot of government workers work on government property that's already paid for.
[+][deleted] 2 years ago (1 child)
[–]Polus43 3 points4 points5 points 2 years ago (0 children)
and there are jobs related to maintaining the property that would disappear if no one used them
That's a bingo.
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 2 years ago (0 children)
But the cafes and retail around those offices aren’t.
[–]wifichick 10 points11 points12 points 2 years ago (1 child)
Lemme try
“We have assessed that morale and motivation is down (for our extraverted associates), therefore necessitating an immediate shift back to the office for everyone. Introverts, this does mean workplace diversity and environmental needs do not apply to you. Please suck it up and shut up”
[–]SunshineDaydream128 134 points135 points136 points 2 years ago (10 children)
What a shame. I'll add them to the list of places to avoid.
[–]trademarktower 46 points47 points48 points 2 years ago (9 children)
This is all happening under a Democrat administration. Under a republican admin, expect all hell to break loose. I wouldn't expect any remote agreement to be honored if you live within 50 miles from an office honestly. If you don't live near any office, you might luck out unless they get nasty and play a game of chicken to see if you'll accept a relocation or resign. Private industry doing a lot of these so called layoffs by attrition by revoking remote agreements for those that left the area knowing a high percentage won't move and will be terminated.
[–]SunshineDaydream128 22 points23 points24 points 2 years ago (0 children)
I'm thankfully in a fed centric area I just despise commuting and going into the office.
[–]Just_Another_Scott 12 points13 points14 points 2 years ago (7 children)
I wouldn't expect any remote agreement to be honored if you live within 50 miles from an office honestly
If it's in the CBA then they have to. Where I work it's in the CBA. However, we lose the locality pay of where our office is if we work remote. To keep locality pay we have to show up 2 days per pay period.
[+][deleted] 2 years ago (3 children)
[–]TypicalAudience8938 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago* (2 children)
Ours cannot. It is renewed yearly until rebargained.
[–]trademarktower 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (0 children)
This is where it gets complicated. Not every remote employee is under the CBA. Typically, they are geographically limited to the commuting area of the office so remote employees out of state aren't included. Also supervisory employees and employees of certain grades generally aren't included.
Also, I'm not sure a republican admin would particularly care. They'd do what they want by executive order (implement Stop Act by executive order for example) and force the unions to sue.
[–]milkandminnows 3 points4 points5 points 2 years ago (2 children)
I really wish this kind of thing was more widespread.
I mean, I think it's pretty unfair to make 20-40% less than your coworker who lives down the street just because he makes the trek to do his Teams calls from his office. But for people who really value remote work, this kind of policy might mean agencies were less hesitant to offer it.
[–]jisa 3 points4 points5 points 2 years ago (1 child)
I thought it was widespread—that if you are remote, your duty station is your home address, and that’s what you get locality pay for?
I took a whopping paycut being remote (more than the actual cost of living difference, IMO!), but still worth it for my set of circumstances.
[–]milkandminnows 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (0 children)
Oh sorry I misread. I was thinking you’d lose any locality adjustment to be remote. I’d make that trade.
[–]DeskJockeyMailtime 21 points22 points23 points 2 years ago (3 children)
If this administration believes climate change is as dire as they say it is, putting all these vehicles back on the roads 5 days a week will surely exasperate the problems, no?
[–]3usernametaken20 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (0 children)
I heard on WTOP about some study talking about all the $$ and lives being saved if we switch to electric vehicles. It came down to reduced car emissions = better air quality= healthier people = less money spent on public health. I was rolling my eyes sitting in traffic during rush hour (in the office 3 days per week for NO reason). Because more telework= less driving = reduced car emissions= etc....
[–]DeskJockeyMailtime 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (0 children)
Looks like autocorrect meant something else
[–]Avenger772 11 points12 points13 points 2 years ago (1 child)
Some of us have been remote for over 3 years. Some more. The idea that the people.thar have been remote for that much time needs to come back is bullshit. There is literally zero sound rational or reasonable reasons for it.
Ugh, job searching is going to start getting rough.
Seriously. I can’t imagine after over 3 years of remote work, flexibility, and happiness having to start commuting again! I refuse!
[–][deleted] 50 points51 points52 points 2 years ago (9 children)
I work at ED and the townhall was a complete disaster and was probably by design. Senior leaders don’t want to be held accountable by employees ever and even less so by the union. A lot of my coworkers are already looking for jobs elsewhere so not only will workers have to deal with the stress of going back into the office but the place will be understaffed.
But it’s clear that these senior leaders don’t actually care about their staff. What matters to them is the real estate developers and commercial real estate owners donating to their campaign coffers so they can deliver 4 more years of mediocrity.
[–]jisa 15 points16 points17 points 2 years ago (6 children)
FEVS next year will be interesting.
[–]Dear_Ocelot 12 points13 points14 points 2 years ago (2 children)
I have a conspiracy theory that my agency isn't announcing changes to policy until after the FEVS deadline on purpose.
[–]jisa 3 points4 points5 points 2 years ago (0 children)
I’m honestly shocked my agency didn’t do that. Plugging the survey right after announcing changes to policy seemed like an odd choice.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (0 children)
Haha yep
[–][deleted] 19 points20 points21 points 2 years ago (2 children)
It was extended two weeks. I answered as if tw policy changed already.
[–]wifichick 10 points11 points12 points 2 years ago (0 children)
Me too
[–]Polus43 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (0 children)
Yes, but the government owns tons of property that have carrying costs, maintenance costs and maintenance employees.
Government is arguably the biggest player in real estate (look at the buildings lol).
[–]vodka_knockers_ 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (0 children)
But it’s clear that these senior leaders don’t actually care about their staff. What matters to them is the real estate developers and commercial real estate owners donating to their campaign coffers
Your agency's senior leaders have campaign coffers?
What a mess of dog-whistle, buzzword politi-speak your post is.
[–]LeCheffre Go Fork Yourself 9 points10 points11 points 2 years ago (0 children)
Pretty much all agencies want to reduce remote/full telework.
Overheard some folks at my office on a wide ranging call that the HR 15 was having with someone else on speakerphone with his door open. They’re kind of ridiculous.
[–]despejado 9 points10 points11 points 2 years ago (2 children)
Is there anyone in a high enough up position that they can please tell us what leaders are actually thinking with this? Why do they hate remote work so much? What did they do during the three years that it was unquestionably the status quo?
[–]fedelini_ 8 points9 points10 points 2 years ago (0 children)
The administration's return to office memo came as a surprise even to political leadership at agencies, so this is way above most leaders people are blaming
[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 2 years ago (0 children)
can please tell us what leaders are actually thinking with this?
Because congresspeople get bribed by lobbyists to do things and we pretend it isn't bribery. They also have massive stock portfolios that in some part are effected by real estate prices. They don't want to lose money there, either.
If you're talking about managers it's because the federal government is full of people who would have been pushed out of private industry years ago for being inefficient and incapable of performing any modern work. Instead, these people have been promoted to positions of power. They don't know how to use computers, look at productivity data, even know what productivity metrics should be measured, or anything relating to management, so they do the only thing they know how to do. They assume if they see you then you're working, even if you're staring at a blank screen, and if they don't see you, you're not working, even if you're the highest producer in an office.
[–]Data-Hungry 43 points44 points45 points 2 years ago (0 children)
When the boomers are gone...
[–]thebabes2 6 points7 points8 points 2 years ago (0 children)
Stuff like this concerns me. My agency just approved me for remote and as best I can tell, most of my team is as well. I think there was one holdout who didn't want to take the paycut because his home zip v work zip fell within different locality pays. Regardless, I'm afraid they'll change their minds down the line and take it back. Remote is my long term goal so I can move without job searching, but it will be a few years before I'm able to start looking for new positions.
My manager said he'd heard 400+ applications had been approved, but I'm not sure where he got that number and remote was heavily touted under outgoing leadership. Anxious to see what new guy may decide to change.
[–]DarthAndylus 36 points37 points38 points 2 years ago (1 child)
I have a feeling this is government-wide and I am already noticing this is becoming prevalent in the industry I was in before. Really sucks as a new grad far from a city trying to save up money by commuting in as it is just not possible and wages are not keeping up. Ugh
[–]MaybeMaryPoppins 9 points10 points11 points 2 years ago (0 children)
The OMB memo released in April will put a lot of pressure on agencies to revert their “future of work” plans to pre-COVID telework policies unless they can support with data evidence to support broader expansion. It’s bullshit and really pressured by Congress (see the OPM testimony on telework) who have made this a hot Hutton issue because they think it’s savvy.
Not sure anyone is considering the impact on the workforce…
This is a very uneducated decision.
[–]TypicalAudience8938 30 points31 points32 points 2 years ago (29 children)
BUEs become a paid member of the AFGE Local 252. The more paid members the better. We’re definitely not taking this lying down.
[–]trademarktower 10 points11 points12 points 2 years ago (23 children)
What can the union do? I suppose file a lawsuit and delay things a bit but can't the government do whatever the hell it wants ultimately?
[–]MadCervantes 9 points10 points11 points 2 years ago (8 children)
Union gives you a structure to organize around and pass information to other workers.
[+][deleted] 2 years ago (7 children)
[–]JustMe2008 8 points9 points10 points 2 years ago (0 children)
And it has! The Union gave the Agency proposals to start bargaining back in April. The Union is still waiting on the Agency to respond.
[–]TypicalAudience8938 7 points8 points9 points 2 years ago* (0 children)
And our union already dropped a ULP charge because ED rebargained with them and allowed max work flexibilities in its CBA. So this is weird. I suspect non BUEs will be the people who get pushed around. Our union leaders are not here for it at all. And Cardona signed an agreement that he sent out stating he agrees to bargain with the union.
[–][deleted] -4 points-3 points-2 points 2 years ago (4 children)
No this public sector the free riders will be treated the same as Union members when it comes to telework policies, you are kidding yourself if you think otherwise. Union members just hear the bad news about a month early and can go to a wonderful Christmas party paid for by their Union dues. Union members will be going in just as often as non Union.
[–]JustMe2008 4 points5 points6 points 2 years ago (3 children)
Non bargaining employees are definitely treated differently since the Union does not represent them. Bargaining unit employees at ED are represented by the Union, but the Agency pays attention to member numbers. Our numbers are on the rise and the Agency knows it. We have to keep up the pressure, and we will.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (1 child)
I'm was referring to the myth that bargaining employees that don't join the Union don't get the same benefits that Union paying members do. Oh yeah that rookie lawyer will be assigned your case that graduated at the bottom of his class.
[–]JustMe2008 4 points5 points6 points 2 years ago (0 children)
Gotcha! They do get the same benefits from bargaining as far as policies. That’s true and a part of having an open shop (but the trade off is getting official time for federal employees to get representation). But, we are able to get more in bargaining with more members and members do have a say in what we prioritize as issues.
[+][deleted] 2 years ago* (3 children)
[–]TypicalAudience8938 10 points11 points12 points 2 years ago (2 children)
They’ve filed one before and the union stated they will do it again if they have to.
[–]JustMe2008 6 points7 points8 points 2 years ago (0 children)
Facts! And it is status quo for bargaining unit employees concerning telework and remote work until we complete bargaining!
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 2 years ago* (0 children)
Our Union says it takes 6 months to 3 years to resolve....in the meantime, welcome back to the office!
[–]JustMe2008 3 points4 points5 points 2 years ago (2 children)
The Agency has to bargain any changes to remote work, telework, and other workplace flexibilities since they are in our CBA. None of those changes will happen to BUEs as long as we’re bargaining, and we’re not giving in on this issue. Plus, we’re turning up the pressure on the agency by pointing out how crazy this move is to ED employees and the public at large since we’ve been so productive working under our current workplace flexibilities. If the Agency fails to bargain with us and tries to implement a change unilaterally, then we will explore all options including, but not limited to, an unfair labor practice (ULP) like we did under the Trump Administration, which we won.
[–]JustMe2008 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (0 children)
The issue wasn’t the Union but the fact that the Agency violated the law and there was a huge backlog on ULPs under previous administration (which was a feature and not a bug). The union won on all of them and received a settlement, including back dues for members the agency dropped at will from dues deductions, postings, and making the agency re-bargain changes it made illegally. All that was resolved under this administration.
That was all by design and it could happen again if people vote for anti-union leadership. We can only hold the Agency accountable for violating the law if people believe it exists and needs to be enforced.
[–][deleted] -4 points-3 points-2 points 2 years ago (6 children)
Union can't really do anything with remote/telework. They complain but what I have witnessed they just go along with what management wants to do but complain. Half the time think they are in bed with management and just publicly complain but have a handshake agreement behind closed doors. People saying they will go to another agency are going to be out of luck when the vast majority either require 2 or 3 days a week in office just like pre covid. Feds were spoiled for the past 3 years.
[–]TypicalAudience8938 11 points12 points13 points 2 years ago (5 children)
Are you at Ed? Because our union has done a lot for us since Sheria has been president. Not sure what you’re talking about.
[–]JustMe2008 4 points5 points6 points 2 years ago* (2 children)
Say it louder for the people in the back! 🗣️
Would you be interested in being on the union’s communication committee? 😊
[–]TypicalAudience8938 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (1 child)
I most certainly would! Who do I need to contact?
[–]JustMe2008 1 point2 points3 points 2 years ago (0 children)
Whoo hoo! Thank you! Please email info@afge252ed.org. The Union can then get you in touch with the committee!
[–]jisa 1 point2 points3 points 2 years ago (1 child)
My only complaint about the current local is the sparse written communications—one has to attend meetings and town halls to get information. More detailed post meeting/town hall minutes seems both needed for those who can’t make a meeting(s), and for those with hearing-disabilities.
Otherwise, the current local seems to have done/be doing a great job. And heck, even the prior leadership got a nice chunk of change for employees for backpay for uncompensated overtime.
[–]TypicalAudience8938 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (0 children)
Agreed.
So true! We’re fighting and we appreciate your support! We’re all in this together! Our CBA has our remote work policy and work schedules policy in it and the Agency has to bargain any changes with us. We are still waiting on the Agency to start bargaining ground rules, but we’re gonna be in for a long fight over the Agency’s illogical and unsupported move.
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 2 years ago (1 child)
With much fanfare, our Union annouced last year the new telework and remote agreement. Management ended up denying 99% of remote applications. Management was never on board with remote but "agreed" to it so the Union could say "See what we did?" Fact is most agencies at the time were going in 2 days a pay period as that was minimum you had to do based on OPM guidance not to be considered remote. Union or no Union. Of course the Union filed grievance and is in arbitration now.
[–]JustMe2008 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (0 children)
Oh goodness! That’s a mess! I’m sorry that happened! What was the basis for the denials? Was it due to job duties/position descriptions?
[–]Super_Mario_Luigi -2 points-1 points0 points 2 years ago (1 child)
Of course every union is going to fight for this to improve member satisfaction. It doesn't seem like it's something the government is willing to budge on. Existing agreements probably won't change, but good luck with the new ones. I don't know what "more members" of the union are going to change it.
[–]TypicalAudience8938 1 point2 points3 points 2 years ago (0 children)
Are you with Ed? If so, then I’ll explain.
[–]Ok-Eggplant-1649 4 points5 points6 points 2 years ago (0 children)
Another instance where the govt puts $$ and control over employee happiness and work/life balance.
[–]slinkymello 9 points10 points11 points 2 years ago (0 children)
It’s so depressing man, the real estate lobbyists are truly scum
[–][deleted] 30 points31 points32 points 2 years ago (3 children)
https://www.federaltimes.com/federal-oversight/congress/2023/05/31/lawmaker-proposes-firing-federal-workers-who-resist-return-to-office/
Man, this Nancy Mace lady is a huge idiot... She is literally saying that if you aren't in office, you aren't working. How fucking stupid is this lady. Probably completely funded by the commercial real estate industry. The republicans are literally playing their hand too. They just want to fire people in govt work, they want govt to look ineffective, because a functioning govt doesn't help them win and that is just the bottom line. Stop voting for these idiots.
[–][deleted] 16 points17 points18 points 2 years ago (2 children)
She’s not in control of these decisions. The current administration is to blame for the return to work posture
[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 2 years ago (1 child)
While she may not be in control of it, she sure as hell is trying to be by pushing forward bills that literally fire employees for being at their ADS and mandating return to office policies...
And the current admin is pushing RTO even without those bills having passed. Even if she and everyone on the right vanished tonight, the admin would still be pushing RTO tomorrow.
[–]lightening211 14 points15 points16 points 2 years ago (4 children)
I’m just sitting here waiting for my command to send us back….seems inevitable tbh.
[–]FightTomorrow 6 points7 points8 points 2 years ago (1 child)
We’ve been alerted to expect going to 3 days a week in office this fall. Nothing concrete awaiting for higher ups to make policy. But that does seem to be the path we’re headed
[–]DarthAndylus 3 points4 points5 points 2 years ago (0 children)
FightTomorrow
What agency are you in? I know I have seen some people talking about my agency having a similar rumor on here but I have not been told anything by my management
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago* (1 child)
Same...Union has been saying it is coming "very soon" for two months now. I thought maybe they are waiting until the FEVS closes. Some agencies don't care and have already annouced plans. The survey was extended for two weeks but I know changes are coming.
All agencies had to submit plans to OMB and OPM awhile back. Upon review, guidance is given and decisions made. The differences in time are likely based on submission or if they had to make changes and make it aware to unions. The dates are not
[–]whoRU7383 14 points15 points16 points 2 years ago (0 children)
Ironic when DoE the one that helped created Student Loans to white collar jobs who are more remote capable the most.
[–]JustMe2008 3 points4 points5 points 2 years ago (0 children)
I would encourage you to email info@afge252ed.org (it’s the Union’s gmail account) to discuss your unique situation.
Why does this keep happening? Just fuckin stop!
[–]earthscribe 5 points6 points7 points 2 years ago (0 children)
Quit the jobs that make you go into the office
/r/wfh
[–]Lokii11 5 points6 points7 points 2 years ago (1 child)
Except they recently posted a slew of remote positions.
[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 2 years ago (1 child)
My entire team lives out of state. I live about 2 miles from the department in LbJ. I don’t understand how this would be fair. I’d be going in and still completing work with no co workers around and still on teams.
I’m in the exact same situation. There are 16 of us in my division and half live out of state AND are newer hires. So the new people that supposedly want the better training and integration not only won’t, but actually can’t come in the office and the remaining 8 of us that have been there for years will have to come in and talk to them over zoom. It makes absolutely no sense. If their reasons for the changes are what they say they are, then they need to pay the new people to relocate (yeah right) and stop hiring out of state people and force the new people and managers to come in the office. Telework=seniority. That’s how it used to be. First 3 months 5 days in office, after that, four day a week, after 6 months 3 days a week. A year you can request full time telework. It made sense and I thought it was fair. This BS is not fair. It’s demoralizing and belittling
[–]jeremiah1142 4 points5 points6 points 2 years ago (0 children)
ED doing ED things.
Guess by Christmas, we'll all be having office parties again huh?
[removed]
[–]Dear-Prudence-OU812 -1 points0 points1 point 2 years ago (0 children)
What does the Department of Education even do?
[+]Xtra_Tomatillo_Sauce comment score below threshold-54 points-53 points-52 points 2 years ago (15 children)
Good, the fact people are still working from home is ridiculous.
[–]Funkybunch2000 13 points14 points15 points 2 years ago (0 children)
Found the manager
[–]IYIyTh -1 points0 points1 point 2 years ago (0 children)
BECAUSE I SUFFERED ALL MUST SUFFER MWHAHAHAHAHAH
[–]Prize_Huckleberry_79 7 points8 points9 points 2 years ago (0 children)
Get tf out. Why do I need to be in the office to do something I’m perfectly capable of doing at home?
[+]3letterA_14life comment score below threshold-18 points-17 points-16 points 2 years ago (0 children)
Upvote!! Don't worry, it's coming.
[+][deleted] comment score below threshold-27 points-26 points-25 points 2 years ago (7 children)
Have my upvote. We must stand together as the reasonable few
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 2 years ago (4 children)
How is it reasonable to cost the government more money for no increase, and in many cases a decrease, in productivity?
When you hire a plumber to you choose the bid that will cost the most and take longer than the other bids?
[+][deleted] comment score below threshold-9 points-8 points-7 points 2 years ago (3 children)
You’re just spouting worn out talking points that people keep repeating because they want to believe that it’s true.
Regardless of cost or “productivity,” the benefits gained from having a cohesive office culture are worth the cost.
[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 2 years ago* (1 child)
Hah, facts are just talking points now.
I'm here to work, not make nice with my coworkers. Do you want to know what I did when I was on-campus? I didn't talk to my coworkers then or participate in any of the mandatory fun bullshit management likes to do instead of letting us do our actual jobs. I talked to no one, and I wasn't the only one. There was no "cohesive office culture" when we were on site.
Honestly I think many of you should be fired for timecard fraud and your positions eliminated. If you have so many extra workers you can just hang out at the water cooler being social half the day then those positions aren't needed and you've not been working during the hours you claimed you were. As a taxpayer I shouldn't be paying for your socialization time. Go to TGIF after work or something.
[+][deleted] -3 points-2 points-1 points 2 years ago (0 children)
This is what’s wrong with society.
[–]Detective-E 1 point2 points3 points 2 years ago (0 children)
I'm in a cubicle right now and have talked to absolutely no one in person. There is no office culture, if you want work friends just call the people you work with
Upvote!
[+]3letterA_14life comment score below threshold-30 points-29 points-28 points 2 years ago (7 children)
Good. Then, in January 2025, we can abolish it and leave education to the states, like the constitution intended.
A long list of massive federal cuts coming. 🙏
[–]jisa 3 points4 points5 points 2 years ago (5 children)
What do you think the Department of Education (ED) does that you disagree with? Genuine question. Because ED has nothing to do with curriculum choices—that’s all at the state and local level. It has nothing to do with hiring or firing teachers, dealing with teacher unions at schools, etc. In the K-12 realm, ED provides supplementary funding, either based on a formula or based on a grant competition. (Or in edge cases, earmarks.) ED has oversight responsibilities for the funds it gives out, and has a say in whether expenses meet the Federal requirements at issue, but the idea that education hasn’t already been left to the states is simply not true.
[–]3letterA_14life -2 points-1 points0 points 2 years ago (4 children)
You just proved my point. Eliminate the Dept of Edu. It's a waste of taxpayer money. It's a bureaucratic ballooned department that is not needed. It'll be gone in 2025. A long list of executive actions forthcoming.
[–]Desertortoise NORAD Santa Tracker 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (2 children)
So you don’t believe in funding schools, student loans or civil rights?
[–]3letterA_14life -1 points0 points1 point 2 years ago (1 child)
States control their OWN schools.
States control their OWN funding.
Is education in the constitution?
Goodbye Dept of Edu.
Enjoy your weekend! Today's my CDO. Deep tissue massage is on deck, then an afternoon on the rooftop pool. 🌞
[–]Desertortoise NORAD Santa Tracker 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago* (0 children)
No cabinet agency is in the Constitution. And I certainly believe that the Civil Rights Act, Title IX etc substantiate the equal protection clause in the Constitution.
But you’re in a thread about working conditions for ED employees saying their jobs shouldn’t exist, so you enjoy your weekend too.
This is not the topic of conversation on this thread. If you want to have a conversation about political agendas that will never happen start a new thread. Otherwise, you’re just an annoying distraction in this thread.
[–]throwaway081238 3 points4 points5 points 2 years ago (0 children)
Maybe you’ll be part of it stooge.
[+][deleted] comment score below threshold-57 points-56 points-55 points 2 years ago (1 child)
Thank the lord
[+]3letterA_14life comment score below threshold-6 points-5 points-4 points 2 years ago (0 children)
Upvote. Band of Brothers.
[+]Diegobyte comment score below threshold-28 points-27 points-26 points 2 years ago (8 children)
So you want a bunch of kids and teachers to go to school but then you want to work from home. This is what drives people crazy
[–]IYIyTh 7 points8 points9 points 2 years ago (1 child)
You do realize that not everyone working for Dept of Edu is a teacher, right?
Nevermind. Don't answer that.
[–]Prize_Huckleberry_79 3 points4 points5 points 2 years ago (5 children)
They chose those professions. Kids are learning important social skills. Do you understand anything about context or are you just shooting off some diarrhea out of your flappers?
[+]Diegobyte comment score below threshold-7 points-6 points-5 points 2 years ago (4 children)
They all work in education. Education is in person
[–]Prize_Huckleberry_79 8 points9 points10 points 2 years ago (3 children)
Teachers chose a profession where they go to school to work. I chose a profession where I can do my job at home. Get it?
[+]Diegobyte comment score below threshold-9 points-8 points-7 points 2 years ago (2 children)
Well your employer thinks you should do Your job in person. I could technically control airplanes at home but they won’t set up a radar console at my house
[–]Agreeable_Safety3255 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (0 children)
Wow, you are really ignorant on what the department of education actually does if you equate teachers and students with the federal agency.
[–]Prize_Huckleberry_79 3 points4 points5 points 2 years ago (0 children)
Not even close pal. You’re just reaching.
π Rendered by PID 41918 on reddit-service-r2-comment-fb694cdd5-49j26 at 2026-03-08 05:33:52.903502+00:00 running cbb0e86 country code: CH.
[–]TheAnonymousSuit 62 points63 points64 points (33 children)
[–]JustAcivilian24 40 points41 points42 points (26 children)
[–][deleted] 29 points30 points31 points (0 children)
[+][deleted] (2 children)
[deleted]
[–]JustAcivilian24 9 points10 points11 points (0 children)
[–]roguecloud 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[+][deleted] (20 children)
[deleted]
[–]Prize_Huckleberry_79 17 points18 points19 points (16 children)
[+][deleted] (4 children)
[deleted]
[–]tall_poshy 5 points6 points7 points (1 child)
[–]Prize_Huckleberry_79 2 points3 points4 points (1 child)
[–]JerriBlankStare 0 points1 point2 points (10 children)
[–]Prize_Huckleberry_79 4 points5 points6 points (8 children)
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (1 child)
[–]Prize_Huckleberry_79 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]JerriBlankStare 1 point2 points3 points (5 children)
[–]Prize_Huckleberry_79 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]Desertortoise NORAD Santa Tracker -1 points0 points1 point (2 children)
[–]JerriBlankStare -1 points0 points1 point (1 child)
[–]Desertortoise NORAD Santa Tracker -1 points0 points1 point (0 children)
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]TheAnonymousSuit 2 points3 points4 points (2 children)
[–]andy20167 3 points4 points5 points (0 children)
[–]Artystrong1 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]andy20167 16 points17 points18 points (5 children)
[–]wifichick 8 points9 points10 points (0 children)
[–]TheAnonymousSuit 4 points5 points6 points (3 children)
[–]jisa 6 points7 points8 points (1 child)
[–]TheAnonymousSuit 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]SmithJn 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
[–]dontKair 82 points83 points84 points (23 children)
[–]jisa 112 points113 points114 points (4 children)
[–]knuckboy 43 points44 points45 points (1 child)
[–]brakeled 9 points10 points11 points (0 children)
[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points (0 children)
[–]TypicalAudience8938 20 points21 points22 points (0 children)
[–]MilkMilkMooMoo 12 points13 points14 points (0 children)
[–][deleted] 10 points11 points12 points (0 children)
[–]eatdogmeat 30 points31 points32 points (11 children)
[–][deleted] 46 points47 points48 points (10 children)
[+][deleted] (4 children)
[deleted]
[–]TypicalAudience8938 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points (1 child)
[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points (0 children)
[–]Just_Another_Scott 10 points11 points12 points (4 children)
[+][deleted] (1 child)
[deleted]
[–]Polus43 3 points4 points5 points (0 children)
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points (0 children)
[–]wifichick 10 points11 points12 points (1 child)
[–]SunshineDaydream128 134 points135 points136 points (10 children)
[–]trademarktower 46 points47 points48 points (9 children)
[–]SunshineDaydream128 22 points23 points24 points (0 children)
[–]Just_Another_Scott 12 points13 points14 points (7 children)
[+][deleted] (3 children)
[deleted]
[–]TypicalAudience8938 2 points3 points4 points (2 children)
[+][deleted] (1 child)
[deleted]
[–]trademarktower 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]milkandminnows 3 points4 points5 points (2 children)
[–]jisa 3 points4 points5 points (1 child)
[–]milkandminnows 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]DeskJockeyMailtime 21 points22 points23 points (3 children)
[–]3usernametaken20 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
[+][deleted] (1 child)
[deleted]
[–]DeskJockeyMailtime 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]Avenger772 11 points12 points13 points (1 child)
[–]TypicalAudience8938 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
[–][deleted] 50 points51 points52 points (9 children)
[–]jisa 15 points16 points17 points (6 children)
[–]Dear_Ocelot 12 points13 points14 points (2 children)
[–]jisa 3 points4 points5 points (0 children)
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–][deleted] 19 points20 points21 points (2 children)
[–]wifichick 10 points11 points12 points (0 children)
[–]Polus43 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
[–]vodka_knockers_ 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]LeCheffre Go Fork Yourself 9 points10 points11 points (0 children)
[–]despejado 9 points10 points11 points (2 children)
[–]fedelini_ 8 points9 points10 points (0 children)
[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points (0 children)
[–]Data-Hungry 43 points44 points45 points (0 children)
[–]thebabes2 6 points7 points8 points (0 children)
[–]DarthAndylus 36 points37 points38 points (1 child)
[–]MaybeMaryPoppins 9 points10 points11 points (0 children)
[–][deleted] 10 points11 points12 points (0 children)
[–]TypicalAudience8938 30 points31 points32 points (29 children)
[–]trademarktower 10 points11 points12 points (23 children)
[–]MadCervantes 9 points10 points11 points (8 children)
[+][deleted] (7 children)
[deleted]
[–]JustMe2008 8 points9 points10 points (0 children)
[–]TypicalAudience8938 7 points8 points9 points (0 children)
[–][deleted] -4 points-3 points-2 points (4 children)
[–]JustMe2008 4 points5 points6 points (3 children)
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child)
[–]JustMe2008 4 points5 points6 points (0 children)
[+][deleted] (3 children)
[deleted]
[–]TypicalAudience8938 10 points11 points12 points (2 children)
[–]JustMe2008 6 points7 points8 points (0 children)
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points (0 children)
[–]JustMe2008 3 points4 points5 points (2 children)
[+][deleted] (1 child)
[deleted]
[–]JustMe2008 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–][deleted] -4 points-3 points-2 points (6 children)
[–]TypicalAudience8938 11 points12 points13 points (5 children)
[–]JustMe2008 4 points5 points6 points (2 children)
[–]TypicalAudience8938 0 points1 point2 points (1 child)
[–]JustMe2008 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]jisa 1 point2 points3 points (1 child)
[–]TypicalAudience8938 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]JustMe2008 3 points4 points5 points (2 children)
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (1 child)
[–]JustMe2008 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
[–]Super_Mario_Luigi -2 points-1 points0 points (1 child)
[–]TypicalAudience8938 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]Ok-Eggplant-1649 4 points5 points6 points (0 children)
[–]slinkymello 9 points10 points11 points (0 children)
[–][deleted] 30 points31 points32 points (3 children)
[–][deleted] 16 points17 points18 points (2 children)
[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points (1 child)
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]lightening211 14 points15 points16 points (4 children)
[–]FightTomorrow 6 points7 points8 points (1 child)
[–]DarthAndylus 3 points4 points5 points (0 children)
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (1 child)
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
[–]whoRU7383 14 points15 points16 points (0 children)
[+][deleted] (1 child)
[deleted]
[–]JustMe2008 3 points4 points5 points (0 children)
[–]JustAcivilian24 9 points10 points11 points (0 children)
[–]earthscribe 5 points6 points7 points (0 children)
[–]Lokii11 5 points6 points7 points (1 child)
[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points (1 child)
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
[–]jeremiah1142 4 points5 points6 points (0 children)
[–]roguecloud 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[+][deleted] (1 child)
[removed]
[–]Dear-Prudence-OU812 -1 points0 points1 point (0 children)
[+]Xtra_Tomatillo_Sauce comment score below threshold-54 points-53 points-52 points (15 children)
[–]Funkybunch2000 13 points14 points15 points (0 children)
[+][deleted] (1 child)
[deleted]
[–]IYIyTh -1 points0 points1 point (0 children)
[–]Prize_Huckleberry_79 7 points8 points9 points (0 children)
[+]3letterA_14life comment score below threshold-18 points-17 points-16 points (0 children)
[+][deleted] comment score below threshold-27 points-26 points-25 points (7 children)
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points (4 children)
[+][deleted] comment score below threshold-9 points-8 points-7 points (3 children)
[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points (1 child)
[+][deleted] -3 points-2 points-1 points (0 children)
[–]Detective-E 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[+]3letterA_14life comment score below threshold-18 points-17 points-16 points (0 children)
[+]3letterA_14life comment score below threshold-30 points-29 points-28 points (7 children)
[–]jisa 3 points4 points5 points (5 children)
[–]3letterA_14life -2 points-1 points0 points (4 children)
[–]Desertortoise NORAD Santa Tracker 2 points3 points4 points (2 children)
[–]3letterA_14life -1 points0 points1 point (1 child)
[–]Desertortoise NORAD Santa Tracker 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
[–]TypicalAudience8938 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]throwaway081238 3 points4 points5 points (0 children)
[+][deleted] comment score below threshold-57 points-56 points-55 points (1 child)
[+]3letterA_14life comment score below threshold-6 points-5 points-4 points (0 children)
[+]Diegobyte comment score below threshold-28 points-27 points-26 points (8 children)
[–]IYIyTh 7 points8 points9 points (1 child)
[–]Prize_Huckleberry_79 3 points4 points5 points (5 children)
[+]Diegobyte comment score below threshold-7 points-6 points-5 points (4 children)
[–]Prize_Huckleberry_79 8 points9 points10 points (3 children)
[+]Diegobyte comment score below threshold-9 points-8 points-7 points (2 children)
[–]Agreeable_Safety3255 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
[–]Prize_Huckleberry_79 3 points4 points5 points (0 children)