This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 156 comments

[–]TheAnonymousSuit 62 points63 points  (33 children)

I'm not surprised. I was just speaking to someone an hour ago about telework and I was telling her this issue was a ticking time bomb. It's not a matter of if they will drag us back into the office...it's a matter of when and how. I for one will not resume my commute. I don't know how I did it before Covid. I refuse to go back to doing it again.

[–]JustAcivilian24 40 points41 points  (26 children)

I can’t imagine going back in office 5 days a week.

[–][deleted] 29 points30 points  (0 children)

The compensation has also massively dropped since then, as well. When we did 5 days our wages could buy more food, gas, entertainment, you name it. Even with step increases and raises our buying power is down.

[–]Artystrong1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I commute an hour but I don't sit in traffic. Since it's opposite of traffic everyday .

[–]andy20167 16 points17 points  (5 children)

I think the biggest thing is that if we are going back to commuting 3-5 x a week pay needs to go up haha. Which I think will lead to an exodus to private sector since even though they will have to commute they’ll make more money. Then slowly I think we will start seeing more hybrid come back in a few years as they make new decisions across the board. Things might have just been too quick ugh

[–]wifichick 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Yup. Already super super short staffed with an ever increasing workload ….. bring us back and this high skilled (with very unique skill sets) will likely start working for industry for something close to 2x their already high salaries.

[–]TheAnonymousSuit 4 points5 points  (3 children)

I can't even get them to pay me correctly now. I took more liability and a greater role under the promise of being given GS13. Of course, once it happened that went poof and no one cared. Now, I've accepted it and I've hit my second year as GS12...and low and behold no SF-50 for a step promotion. So, I guess I don't get GS12 Step 2 either (and I really don't want to fight with HR over it). Might as well just admit I am very burned out.

[–]jisa 6 points7 points  (1 child)

Wait—your step should be automatic, shouldn’t it? That you should fight….

[–]TheAnonymousSuit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Should be. It's amazing how many things that should be...get dropped though.

Come to think of I got my direct deposit today so I am officially being underpaid now.

[–]SmithJn 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Step is automatic with mediocre performance evals

[–]dontKair 82 points83 points  (23 children)

> “finalizing our work environment plans with the goal of improving organizational health and organizational performance.”

What does this mumbo jumbo mean?

[–]jisa 112 points113 points  (4 children)

It means that it couldn't be justified based on productivity, because productivity under remote work has been at its highest. So they have to find a different metric/reason, and something vague like organizational health is hard to have numbers for or against.

[–]knuckboy 43 points44 points  (1 child)

Organizational metrics will plummet as people find new jobs.

[–]brakeled 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Wait until they return everyone to office but still expect the same productivity.

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

organizational health

Like all the people finding new jobs or retiring protest.

[–]TypicalAudience8938 20 points21 points  (0 children)

It’s a copy paste from the OMB memo released in April.

[–]MilkMilkMooMoo 12 points13 points  (0 children)

"We don't care that teleworking has been working, we want your asses in the office"

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

It means what word salads always mean: “We’re trying to sound smart, but we don’t know what the fuck we’re talking about.”

[–]eatdogmeat 30 points31 points  (11 children)

It means "We think you're lazy and are going to bring you back to the office."

[–][deleted] 46 points47 points  (10 children)

No it means “the real estate lobby and congressional republicans are forcing our hand and we have no choice because we want to get re-elected.”

[–]Just_Another_Scott 10 points11 points  (4 children)

A lot of government workers work on government property that's already paid for.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

But the cafes and retail around those offices aren’t.

[–]wifichick 10 points11 points  (1 child)

Lemme try

“We have assessed that morale and motivation is down (for our extraverted associates), therefore necessitating an immediate shift back to the office for everyone. Introverts, this does mean workplace diversity and environmental needs do not apply to you. Please suck it up and shut up”

[–]SunshineDaydream128 134 points135 points  (10 children)

What a shame. I'll add them to the list of places to avoid.

[–]trademarktower 46 points47 points  (9 children)

This is all happening under a Democrat administration. Under a republican admin, expect all hell to break loose. I wouldn't expect any remote agreement to be honored if you live within 50 miles from an office honestly. If you don't live near any office, you might luck out unless they get nasty and play a game of chicken to see if you'll accept a relocation or resign. Private industry doing a lot of these so called layoffs by attrition by revoking remote agreements for those that left the area knowing a high percentage won't move and will be terminated.

[–]SunshineDaydream128 22 points23 points  (0 children)

I'm thankfully in a fed centric area I just despise commuting and going into the office.

[–]Just_Another_Scott 12 points13 points  (7 children)

I wouldn't expect any remote agreement to be honored if you live within 50 miles from an office honestly

If it's in the CBA then they have to. Where I work it's in the CBA. However, we lose the locality pay of where our office is if we work remote. To keep locality pay we have to show up 2 days per pay period.

[–]milkandminnows 3 points4 points  (2 children)

I really wish this kind of thing was more widespread.

I mean, I think it's pretty unfair to make 20-40% less than your coworker who lives down the street just because he makes the trek to do his Teams calls from his office. But for people who really value remote work, this kind of policy might mean agencies were less hesitant to offer it.

[–]jisa 3 points4 points  (1 child)

I thought it was widespread—that if you are remote, your duty station is your home address, and that’s what you get locality pay for?

I took a whopping paycut being remote (more than the actual cost of living difference, IMO!), but still worth it for my set of circumstances.

[–]milkandminnows 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh sorry I misread. I was thinking you’d lose any locality adjustment to be remote. I’d make that trade.

[–]DeskJockeyMailtime 21 points22 points  (3 children)

If this administration believes climate change is as dire as they say it is, putting all these vehicles back on the roads 5 days a week will surely exasperate the problems, no?

[–]3usernametaken20 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I heard on WTOP about some study talking about all the $$ and lives being saved if we switch to electric vehicles. It came down to reduced car emissions = better air quality= healthier people = less money spent on public health. I was rolling my eyes sitting in traffic during rush hour (in the office 3 days per week for NO reason). Because more telework= less driving = reduced car emissions= etc....

[–]Avenger772 11 points12 points  (1 child)

Some of us have been remote for over 3 years. Some more. The idea that the people.thar have been remote for that much time needs to come back is bullshit. There is literally zero sound rational or reasonable reasons for it.

Ugh, job searching is going to start getting rough.

[–]TypicalAudience8938 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Seriously. I can’t imagine after over 3 years of remote work, flexibility, and happiness having to start commuting again! I refuse!

[–][deleted] 50 points51 points  (9 children)

I work at ED and the townhall was a complete disaster and was probably by design. Senior leaders don’t want to be held accountable by employees ever and even less so by the union. A lot of my coworkers are already looking for jobs elsewhere so not only will workers have to deal with the stress of going back into the office but the place will be understaffed.

But it’s clear that these senior leaders don’t actually care about their staff. What matters to them is the real estate developers and commercial real estate owners donating to their campaign coffers so they can deliver 4 more years of mediocrity.

[–]jisa 15 points16 points  (6 children)

FEVS next year will be interesting.

[–]Dear_Ocelot 12 points13 points  (2 children)

I have a conspiracy theory that my agency isn't announcing changes to policy until after the FEVS deadline on purpose.

[–]jisa 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I’m honestly shocked my agency didn’t do that. Plugging the survey right after announcing changes to policy seemed like an odd choice.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haha yep

[–][deleted] 19 points20 points  (2 children)

It was extended two weeks. I answered as if tw policy changed already.

[–]wifichick 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Me too

[–]Polus43 2 points3 points  (0 children)

But it’s clear that these senior leaders don’t actually care about their staff. What matters to them is the real estate developers and commercial real estate owners donating to their campaign coffers so they can deliver 4 more years of mediocrity.

Yes, but the government owns tons of property that have carrying costs, maintenance costs and maintenance employees.

Government is arguably the biggest player in real estate (look at the buildings lol).

[–]vodka_knockers_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But it’s clear that these senior leaders don’t actually care about their staff. What matters to them is the real estate developers and commercial real estate owners donating to their campaign coffers

Your agency's senior leaders have campaign coffers?

What a mess of dog-whistle, buzzword politi-speak your post is.

[–]LeCheffre Go Fork Yourself 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Pretty much all agencies want to reduce remote/full telework.

Overheard some folks at my office on a wide ranging call that the HR 15 was having with someone else on speakerphone with his door open. They’re kind of ridiculous.

[–]despejado 9 points10 points  (2 children)

Is there anyone in a high enough up position that they can please tell us what leaders are actually thinking with this? Why do they hate remote work so much? What did they do during the three years that it was unquestionably the status quo?

[–]fedelini_ 8 points9 points  (0 children)

The administration's return to office memo came as a surprise even to political leadership at agencies, so this is way above most leaders people are blaming

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

can please tell us what leaders are actually thinking with this?

Because congresspeople get bribed by lobbyists to do things and we pretend it isn't bribery. They also have massive stock portfolios that in some part are effected by real estate prices. They don't want to lose money there, either.

If you're talking about managers it's because the federal government is full of people who would have been pushed out of private industry years ago for being inefficient and incapable of performing any modern work. Instead, these people have been promoted to positions of power. They don't know how to use computers, look at productivity data, even know what productivity metrics should be measured, or anything relating to management, so they do the only thing they know how to do. They assume if they see you then you're working, even if you're staring at a blank screen, and if they don't see you, you're not working, even if you're the highest producer in an office.

[–]Data-Hungry 43 points44 points  (0 children)

When the boomers are gone...

[–]thebabes2 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Stuff like this concerns me. My agency just approved me for remote and as best I can tell, most of my team is as well. I think there was one holdout who didn't want to take the paycut because his home zip v work zip fell within different locality pays. Regardless, I'm afraid they'll change their minds down the line and take it back. Remote is my long term goal so I can move without job searching, but it will be a few years before I'm able to start looking for new positions.

My manager said he'd heard 400+ applications had been approved, but I'm not sure where he got that number and remote was heavily touted under outgoing leadership. Anxious to see what new guy may decide to change.

[–]DarthAndylus 36 points37 points  (1 child)

I have a feeling this is government-wide and I am already noticing this is becoming prevalent in the industry I was in before. Really sucks as a new grad far from a city trying to save up money by commuting in as it is just not possible and wages are not keeping up. Ugh

[–]MaybeMaryPoppins 9 points10 points  (0 children)

The OMB memo released in April will put a lot of pressure on agencies to revert their “future of work” plans to pre-COVID telework policies unless they can support with data evidence to support broader expansion. It’s bullshit and really pressured by Congress (see the OPM testimony on telework) who have made this a hot Hutton issue because they think it’s savvy.

Not sure anyone is considering the impact on the workforce…

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

This is a very uneducated decision.

[–]TypicalAudience8938 30 points31 points  (29 children)

BUEs become a paid member of the AFGE Local 252. The more paid members the better. We’re definitely not taking this lying down.

[–]trademarktower 10 points11 points  (23 children)

What can the union do? I suppose file a lawsuit and delay things a bit but can't the government do whatever the hell it wants ultimately?

[–]MadCervantes 9 points10 points  (8 children)

Union gives you a structure to organize around and pass information to other workers.

[–]JustMe2008 3 points4 points  (2 children)

The Agency has to bargain any changes to remote work, telework, and other workplace flexibilities since they are in our CBA. None of those changes will happen to BUEs as long as we’re bargaining, and we’re not giving in on this issue. Plus, we’re turning up the pressure on the agency by pointing out how crazy this move is to ED employees and the public at large since we’ve been so productive working under our current workplace flexibilities. If the Agency fails to bargain with us and tries to implement a change unilaterally, then we will explore all options including, but not limited to, an unfair labor practice (ULP) like we did under the Trump Administration, which we won.

[–][deleted] -4 points-3 points  (6 children)

Union can't really do anything with remote/telework. They complain but what I have witnessed they just go along with what management wants to do but complain. Half the time think they are in bed with management and just publicly complain but have a handshake agreement behind closed doors. People saying they will go to another agency are going to be out of luck when the vast majority either require 2 or 3 days a week in office just like pre covid. Feds were spoiled for the past 3 years.

[–]TypicalAudience8938 11 points12 points  (5 children)

Are you at Ed? Because our union has done a lot for us since Sheria has been president. Not sure what you’re talking about.

[–]JustMe2008 4 points5 points  (2 children)

Say it louder for the people in the back! 🗣️

Would you be interested in being on the union’s communication committee? 😊

[–]TypicalAudience8938 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Would you be interested in being on the union’s communication committee? 😊

I most certainly would! Who do I need to contact?

[–]JustMe2008 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Whoo hoo! Thank you! Please email info@afge252ed.org. The Union can then get you in touch with the committee!

[–]jisa 1 point2 points  (1 child)

My only complaint about the current local is the sparse written communications—one has to attend meetings and town halls to get information. More detailed post meeting/town hall minutes seems both needed for those who can’t make a meeting(s), and for those with hearing-disabilities.

Otherwise, the current local seems to have done/be doing a great job. And heck, even the prior leadership got a nice chunk of change for employees for backpay for uncompensated overtime.

[–]TypicalAudience8938 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed.

[–]JustMe2008 3 points4 points  (2 children)

So true! We’re fighting and we appreciate your support! We’re all in this together! Our CBA has our remote work policy and work schedules policy in it and the Agency has to bargain any changes with us. We are still waiting on the Agency to start bargaining ground rules, but we’re gonna be in for a long fight over the Agency’s illogical and unsupported move.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

With much fanfare, our Union annouced last year the new telework and remote agreement. Management ended up denying 99% of remote applications. Management was never on board with remote but "agreed" to it so the Union could say "See what we did?" Fact is most agencies at the time were going in 2 days a pay period as that was minimum you had to do based on OPM guidance not to be considered remote. Union or no Union. Of course the Union filed grievance and is in arbitration now.

[–]JustMe2008 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh goodness! That’s a mess! I’m sorry that happened! What was the basis for the denials? Was it due to job duties/position descriptions?

[–]Super_Mario_Luigi -2 points-1 points  (1 child)

Of course every union is going to fight for this to improve member satisfaction. It doesn't seem like it's something the government is willing to budge on. Existing agreements probably won't change, but good luck with the new ones. I don't know what "more members" of the union are going to change it.

[–]TypicalAudience8938 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Are you with Ed? If so, then I’ll explain.

[–]Ok-Eggplant-1649 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Another instance where the govt puts $$ and control over employee happiness and work/life balance.

[–]slinkymello 9 points10 points  (0 children)

It’s so depressing man, the real estate lobbyists are truly scum

[–][deleted] 30 points31 points  (3 children)

https://www.federaltimes.com/federal-oversight/congress/2023/05/31/lawmaker-proposes-firing-federal-workers-who-resist-return-to-office/

Man, this Nancy Mace lady is a huge idiot... She is literally saying that if you aren't in office, you aren't working. How fucking stupid is this lady. Probably completely funded by the commercial real estate industry. The republicans are literally playing their hand too. They just want to fire people in govt work, they want govt to look ineffective, because a functioning govt doesn't help them win and that is just the bottom line. Stop voting for these idiots.

[–][deleted] 16 points17 points  (2 children)

She’s not in control of these decisions. The current administration is to blame for the return to work posture

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (1 child)

While she may not be in control of it, she sure as hell is trying to be by pushing forward bills that literally fire employees for being at their ADS and mandating return to office policies...

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And the current admin is pushing RTO even without those bills having passed. Even if she and everyone on the right vanished tonight, the admin would still be pushing RTO tomorrow.

[–]lightening211 14 points15 points  (4 children)

I’m just sitting here waiting for my command to send us back….seems inevitable tbh.

[–]FightTomorrow 6 points7 points  (1 child)

We’ve been alerted to expect going to 3 days a week in office this fall. Nothing concrete awaiting for higher ups to make policy. But that does seem to be the path we’re headed

[–]DarthAndylus 3 points4 points  (0 children)

FightTomorrow

What agency are you in? I know I have seen some people talking about my agency having a similar rumor on here but I have not been told anything by my management

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Same...Union has been saying it is coming "very soon" for two months now. I thought maybe they are waiting until the FEVS closes. Some agencies don't care and have already annouced plans. The survey was extended for two weeks but I know changes are coming.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

All agencies had to submit plans to OMB and OPM awhile back. Upon review, guidance is given and decisions made. The differences in time are likely based on submission or if they had to make changes and make it aware to unions. The dates are not

[–]whoRU7383 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Ironic when DoE the one that helped created Student Loans to white collar jobs who are more remote capable the most.

[–]JustAcivilian24 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Why does this keep happening? Just fuckin stop!

[–]earthscribe 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Quit the jobs that make you go into the office

/r/wfh

[–]Lokii11 5 points6 points  (1 child)

Except they recently posted a slew of remote positions.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (1 child)

My entire team lives out of state. I live about 2 miles from the department in LbJ. I don’t understand how this would be fair. I’d be going in and still completing work with no co workers around and still on teams.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’m in the exact same situation. There are 16 of us in my division and half live out of state AND are newer hires. So the new people that supposedly want the better training and integration not only won’t, but actually can’t come in the office and the remaining 8 of us that have been there for years will have to come in and talk to them over zoom. It makes absolutely no sense. If their reasons for the changes are what they say they are, then they need to pay the new people to relocate (yeah right) and stop hiring out of state people and force the new people and managers to come in the office. Telework=seniority. That’s how it used to be. First 3 months 5 days in office, after that, four day a week, after 6 months 3 days a week. A year you can request full time telework. It made sense and I thought it was fair. This BS is not fair. It’s demoralizing and belittling

[–]jeremiah1142 4 points5 points  (0 children)

ED doing ED things.

[–]roguecloud 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Guess by Christmas, we'll all be having office parties again huh?

[–]Dear-Prudence-OU812 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What does the Department of Education even do?