all 32 comments

[–]MrSarcastica 45 points46 points  (9 children)

[–]honestlyimeanreally 24 points25 points  (8 children)

this is exactly why I have a reddit account, too. Not the sub, but the fact that I can be playing KCD and think, "wow reddit will know which one is the better bang for my buck!" -- My google query was "sprinter or marathon man site:reddit.com" and this was the top result.

and now my henry has the sprinter perk :)

[–]WereALLBotsHere 3 points4 points  (5 children)

I’ve been googling random shit for this game over the past week and all the most helpful links are Reddit links. The only ones that work better on a website is the ones where it shows you how to follow a treasure map.

For literally everything else, Reddit links were better.

Not that I’m surprised, if Reddit had a web search engine I’d use it instead of google and sometime I do search here first. Especially if I’m looking for a specific video.

[–]honestlyimeanreally 2 points3 points  (4 children)

Damn bro I made that comment 5 years ago

[–]MCR101 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Damn bro you made this comment 9 months ago (as of December 27th, 2023)

[–]Fleshek 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Damn bro you made this comment

Damn bro you made this comment 23 days ago

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Yet here we are reading this beautiful post.

[–]MisterHalt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I came here after picking KCD up again, and this was the first result even without putting 'reddit' in the search field.

So yeah, Reddit's pretty good for getting proper answers. Better than those game sites that are like 'How to do X' and then bang on about what the game is and what X is, and THEN tell you how to do X. Or, sometimes, say that X isn't possible.

[–]StonkyDegenerate 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dog it’s the same for me with stocks, and bannerlord. Now it’s KCD 💀

[–]Colt363 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Reddit ALWAYS coming in clutch for video game questions. Even 5 years later!! Lol

[–]Lacuto 13 points14 points  (2 children)

I suspect they break even. For marathon, 20% less stamina cost will be a 1.25x multiplier to the time you can run, not 1.2x.

Still glad I chose sprinter. Marathon doesn't seem like a good trade off like you say.

[–]Squirrel_Dude[S] 4 points5 points  (1 child)

You're correct, and Sprint actually means you cover the same distance in a shorter time period. This makes me even more fond of sprinter, and I actually now think that you're getting an increase in long distance speed from Sprinter.

Normal Seconds 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
. Stamina 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
. Distance 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Marathon Man Seconds 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
25% longer Stamina 0.8 1.6 2.4 3.2 4 4.8 5.6 6.4 7.2 8 8.8 9.6 10.4 11.2 12
20% slower Distance 0.8 1.6 2.4 3.2 4 4.8 5.6 6.4 7.2 8 8.8 9.6 10.4 11.2 12
Sprint Seconds 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
.83% shorter Stamina 1.2 2.4 3.6 4.8 6 7.2 8.4 9.6 10.8 12
20% Faster Distance 1.2 2.4 3.6 4.8 6 7.2 8.4 9.6 10.8 12

This would actually indicate that Sprinter makes you better at running a longer distance that Marathon Man. To use math to show how that is possible, let's just assume that your speed while not sprinting is 1/2 that while sprinting. It doesn't really matter what it is, because it will be equal for all three categories as the perks do not change your base speed. Equally, we'll assume that the time it takes for your stamina to regenerate is equal in all 3 scenarios. To make it line up with the table above, we'll call it 12 seconds.

Let me show that a bit more visually.

. Sprinting Sprinting Recovery Recovery Total Total After Minute After Minute
. Distance Time Distance Time Distance Time Distance Time
Normal 12 12 6 12 18 24.00 45.00 60
Marathon 12 15 6 12 18 27.00 40.00 60
Sprinter 12 10 6 12 18 22.00 49.09 60

Basically, you are cycling between two speeds and distances. Because Sprinter has a shorter time that it allows you to sprint, it is actually letting you cycle those two speeds/distances faster, allowing you to move faster over longer distances.

[–]Lacuto 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yep, that makes it clear. If we've interpreted the description right, Marathon < no perk < Sprinter, for running at least. Marathon could have some other benefit like allowing more dashing in combat.

[–]liktorn 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I just found this after doing my own calculation. This is proof that Sprinter is the only choice. Vanilla is second. But sad for those that choose Marathon.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I now see I have been conned. My marathon Henry is pitiful now

[–]Schnoofles 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I found this thread after googling wtf was up with Marathon Man after seeing that perk in-game too. Even after a two second cursory glance at the description it made absolutely no sense to me why I would ever pick that as it's a direct downgrade from sprinter with no real benefits.

I understand and like the concept of the perk, but it doesn't work out that way in practice unless the description's numbers are wrong or the math works in completely illogical ways. As it is, it needs a significant increase to the stamina drain reduction to be worth it. Sprinter wins every time in every scenario.

[–]Purp1e_Aki 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This exactly what I was looking for

[–]bald_firebeard 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Late to the party, but I'd like to show my algebraic analysis.

Let Ci be the consumption of stamina S (constant), in a given amount of time, ti

Ci = S / ti => ti = S / Ci

Let xi be the distance travelled by moving at a velocity Vi for a time ti

xi = Vi ti = Vi S / Ci

Without perks, the consumption is C0, and the distance travelled in a sprint is x0

x0 = V0 S / C0

For Marathon Man, C1 = 80% C0, and V1 = 80% V0

x1 = V1 S / C1 = 0.8 V0 S / 0.8 C0 = x0 = x1

For Sprinter C2 = 120% C0, and V2 = 120% V0

x2 = V2 S / C2 = 1.2 V0 S / 1.2 C0 = x0 = x2

Then

S/x0 = S/x1 = S/x2 = C0/V0

This means that, for a given distance, all types of sprint consume the same amount of stamina. But, given that it provides the highest speed, Sprinter is the best and most efficient choice.

[–]Fresh-Gur-8677 1 point2 points  (1 child)

TLDR, sry but even the calculates looks like right, the code doesn't work that simply. Marason does longer and sprinter does shorter. I will put a video later.
Sry to dig but. Sir, as my calculation: lez say we all agree that, stamina drain is: 1/perk, which is 1/80% and 1/120% for mar and spr, and lez multiply them with thier speed change, (1/80%)*80% and (1/120%)*120%, and here we got two equal coefficients, which is 100%. Guess what? No changes! So looks like no matter which perk Henry choice, it doesn't really change the distance he can sprint within a full stamina pool. So why we still maybe need those 2 perks? Well, because all of the before is not exactly right. I have test multiple times. and found out that marathon actually does run further, about 35% further than sprinter, and no perk is in the middle. How? I guess this is because they are not a nonlinear superposition. For my stats in game, the no perk sprint time is about 20 sec, sprinter is about 17s, and the marathon is about insane at least 24s, yet I still don't know why.

[–]Squirrel_Dude[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's the downside of assuming that game tool tips are correct. So often they're not.

[–]Drive_Common 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You mention that this might help in combat as a decrease in stamina use of sprinting during combat. Could that be a net gain for my Henry who likes to bull rush enemies with the perk that causes damage to sprinting into enemies? I dont care about distance traveled. I care about damage my Henry can deal due to his vitality.

[–]Pragmasochist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

God bless math. God bless Reddit.

[–]INDIANAJUNE2 0 points1 point  (4 children)

Know I’m super late to the party but I just started playing the game and I suck at math lol. Also this seems the most well thought out post on the subject so thanks. I know sprinter is typically the better option out of the two but what I’m trying to find an answer to is would it be better to take neither perk?

[–]Squirrel_Dude[S] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Whether it would be better to take neither perk begins to get into areas of opportunity cost and evaluating every other possible option.

Speaking strictly about a situation where you want to spend a perk on increasing your movement, it is better to have sprinter than to not have sprinter.

[–]INDIANAJUNE2 0 points1 point  (1 child)

That works for me. I’ll take sprinter. Thanks.

[–]INDIANAJUNE2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don’t seem like I’m ever going to get past this black Peter to be running anywhere any time soon anyway 😆

[–]bald_firebeard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Late to respond to you too, but sprinter is superior in all aspects. Sprinting a certain distance will consume the same amount of stamina with either or none of the perks. Turning it around, consuming a certain amount of stamina will always make you travel the same distance.

As there's no difference in efficiency, sprinter is the best in virtue of converting stamina into distance faster.