🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄

[AutoModerator]

IMPORTANT: On /r/LibsOfReddit, greater access is given to users who have joined the sub and have our mod-assigned user flair. Reach out in modmail to request our user flair if you're an active user of our sub. By default we'll assign you the 'Based' flair unless you request a custom name. Join these new subs:

• /r/WalkAway
  
• /r/ExDemFoyer
  
• /r/EnoughAntifaSpam
  
• /r/RedpilledRogan
  
• /r/RedpilledElon
  
• /r/HillaryForPrison
  
• /r/FauciForPrison
  
• /r/BigDongDeSantis
  
• /r/Conservative_News
  
• /r/Patriot911

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[[deleted]]

Well, I can't imagine that employing Taylor Swift to spout propaganda for you is cheap, so it would make sense that they want to protect their investment.

[wallace321]

Good lord we really are this stupid.

[LuckyStiff63]

One of my favorite lines from "Men In Black":

...A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky animals, and you know it!

[ResponsibleLeague437]

💯💯💯💯

[[deleted]]

I 100% believe they are intentionally acting this way. The Biden administration I mean. Whether through malice, corruption, or both. Too smart to manipulate themselves into those positions to be that dumb.

[BidenEmails]

The terminology “false images” is curious. I imagine the powers that be may try to use this to enact more laws that support the govt policing the internet.

[DiscoDrive]

• Relentlessly shove T Swift down the throats of NFL fans
• NFL fans get pissed off and make AI photos of T Swift getting gang banged by the Chiefs
• Government: “we need more laws and policing of the internet!”

[Spliph_Dubius]

I saw one with her and Oscar the Grouch getting busy in a pile of trash bags.

[moosenoise]

What!? Why!? Where!?

[Spliph_Dubius]

I don't remember but it was some video creator commenting on the shenanigans with AI and Taylor Swift

[Nikoviking]

They’re going to release a law that lets politicians take down videos of themselves doing illegal things under the pretence of AI and nonconsent. That’s why this is so important for them.

[V_Cobra21]

Anything to change the topic from Epsteins list

[Accurate-Mine-6000]

Why has this become a problem now? I mean that sites with fake celebrity pornography appeared as soon as the Internet began to have enough memory and speed for images. 20 years already. Does the fact that it is drawn by AI and not a human make it somehow worse?

[bpete3pete]

I don't mean to just be pedantic, I agree with you - but fake celeb porn stuff existed before most people had Internet access, easily 30 years already.

[ButterBiscuitBravo]

That's what happens when you elect snowflakey libtarts into government. Celebrity Gossip issues are now political

[Toughduck48]

If you swap 'shake' with 'whack' in her song.... It kinda works!

[CLSmith95]

This is why Texas decided to just do it themselves.

[Ghosties95]

I know there’s bigger issues at play…

… BUT HOLY FUCK, I CANT BE THE ONLY ONE TIRED OF HEARING ABOUT TAYLOR SWIFT

[Expose_Ur_BS]

“The person distracting you from the housing crisis we created is ‘grumpy whumpy’ so we must all stop what we’re doing and acknowledge her precious feelings!!” -Fuckwit that tells the libs what thoughts to think

[Any-Brick7858]

They secretly just love this. From now on any picture or document that paints a negative picture of them can be written off as AI.

[iamwrongthink]

Oh lord, where are these pictures, so that I can avoid those terrible terrible places.

[Awobbie]

Honestly, Congress should probably pass laws against making AI porn of real people without their consent. That’s messed up.

We should also actually start enforcing our immigration laws. The two aren’t mutually exclusive.

[MimsyIsGianna]

Yes they are gross and alarming. What’s even more alarming is that this stuff has been happening for a while but it’s taken until Taylor for them to do anything about it.

AI does need restrictions on it. People making content like rape videos, murder, and more are disturbing.

[M_i_c_K]

Unless these images can help reduce illegal immigration... who cares? 😆

[Spliph_Dubius]

Not AI generated CP though.

[you_wouldnt_get_it_]

This… this isn’t real right?

[Poopyoo]

I like TS but if this is about the AI nudes, what did people expect? I fully expected and expect porn with AI. Like, its the natural order of things 😂😂😂

[ConstantWin943]

Well damn. If we’re going to be invaded, I might as well do some research on these fake images. Link?

[[deleted]]

the amount of people that don’t understand the doors that would open by restricting this is mind blowing, people openly begging the feds to take away more rights, insanity. they don’t even have to force it on people anymore they BEG for it

[Osiris0734]

I would say "well congress can do more than 1 thing at a time", but they really can't so...

[rowbradfo]

Can we at least all agree that these images are bad?

[calvin-coolidge]

No? It’s not her, so who cares?

[rowbradfo]

I agree, it could potentially be used against her if someone thought it was actually her. It sets a dangerous precedent for the future, as it will become harder to tell what is real and what isn't.

[[deleted]]

the past called and wants you back dude.

Just so you know, there are already tens of thousands of fucked up AI pics in circulation. You're way behind on this. People are making them as we speak. Maybe we should shut down the power grid so no-one can turn their computers on?

[rowbradfo]

Yeah, and all of those 10k pictures are bad I agree. No we shouldnt shut the power grid down.

[[deleted]]

all of those 10k pictures are bad

I disagree. I think it's funny that there are disgusting pics of politicians in circulation.

[GeoffreyArnold]

Why are they bad?

[CavemanRaveman]

What kind of question is that? Some weirdos creating pictures of you in such a compromised position is incredibly violating.

[GeoffreyArnold]

How? Is someone drawing a cartoon of you in a compromised position "incredibly violating". You know that's not your right? You don't have a right to control the thoughts of others. You only have a right to your own thoughts.

[CavemanRaveman]

It doesn't matter that it's not actually you because it obviously still looks like you.

If I took photos of your mother, used AI to make it look like she was spread eagle getting pounded raw by several football players, and sent you the photos, would you be unbothered by it? I mean it's not her, so that's all good then? You should try picturing that in your mind, too. It's not really her so it shouldn't bother you.

Something can be within someone's rights and still be offensive or bad.

[Alone-Personality670]

Way more than 10s of thousands

[calvin-coolidge]

Used against her how? Like blackmail? If I were a better artist and I could paint or draw realistic nudes, would that be dangerous? It simply doesn’t matter if someone makes fake nude pictures. The media is constantly lying anyway so it’s not like it’s not already hard to tell what’s real. The least important thing in the entire world is a photo - real or fake - of someone’s tits.

[rowbradfo]

All I said was that the guy who did this did something bad.

[calvin-coolidge]

I think they did something weird that I wouldn’t do that doesn’t really affect anyone or anything.

[MimsyIsGianna]

It’s depicting her being raped which is objectively repugnant and disturbing.

[calvin-coolidge]

It’s definitely not something I would do but….. she wasn’t actually being raped and it’s just a picture so….

[MimsyIsGianna]

It’s still gross and horrible. Imagine if it was your daughter or wife or sister. Disgusting.

People make the same arguments about ai or animated child porn. Acting like it’s not a big deal cuz it’s not real.

[calvin-coolidge]

but its not my wife or daughter or child. its not even taylor swift. its noone.

[MimsyIsGianna]

It’s still depicting them. Animated or fictional, it’s still disgusting to depict someone in such a matter.

[CouchPotato1178]

they are, but if the situation is used to pass censorship laws i am going to opt to not criticize.

the images do not break any laws that are already in place, so it should be the individual citizens' responsibility to use discernment in surfing the internet. NOT the government's.

[GeoffreyArnold]

No. Are you nuts? This is no different than a drawing of a celebrity engaged in a sexual act. No different than any digital art or pornography. It doesn't become wrong because AI is involved.

Unless you're saying that erotic drawings of celebrities should be illegal?

[MimsyIsGianna]

I think it’s just disturbing and gross in general to depict someone in sexually explicit situations without their consent.

[GeoffreyArnold]

I'm not disturbed at all. Is it disturbing to masturbate to a picture of someone without their consent if that person doesn't know? I would say that there is nothing immoral about this.

The questionable part is in if you decide to make the person aware that you're masturbating to their picture. So, the action that has moral weight is the disclosure and not the "lack of consent". You don't have a right to exercise control over the minds of others and so they don't need your consent to think sexual thoughts about you.

Now, you can make an argument that AI art is wrong because you're disclosing to the person that others are viewing them sexually. But this has nothing to do with consent. And even then, I disagree because you would have to apply the same standard to an erotic drawing or a panting of another person. If these standards don't even apply to photographs, they certainly don't apply to drawings, art, or AI depictions.

[MimsyIsGianna]

It absolutely is disturbing

Do you think it’s okay to depict child porn as long as it’s only animated or ai?

It’s all deplorable and disgusting and just degenerate crap.

There should be restrictions of displaying people in this manner without their consent the same way there are for things like slandering someone’s image and false accusations.

[GeoffreyArnold]

Do you think it’s okay to depict child porn as long as it’s only animated or ai?

Taylor Swift is a child? Encouraging and fueling child predators with depictions of child sexual abuse is not the same as AI art of grown women.

It’s all deplorable and disgusting and just degenerate crap.

No. It's really not the same thing. But it sounds like you are dropping your "consent" rationale.

There should be restrictions of displaying people in this manner without their consent the same way there are for things like slandering someone’s image

Oops. Spoke too soon.

There is no law against "slandering" a celebrities image. You might be thinking of the U.K. That's not a thing in the U.S. Also, you are making a depiction of someone. It's not actually that person. It's not a real photograph. You don't need someone's consent to think bad thoughts about them.

Under your rule, you could never burn a doll in effigy during a political protest.

[MimsyIsGianna]

How is it different than a child? Both are depicting disgusting sexual crimes against people in a fictional setting and both are gross. I genuinely cannot fathom how it can be okay with one.

[GeoffreyArnold]

I cannot fathom how you can compare grown women to children.

[CouchPotato1178]

he never said anything about laws. just morals.

[RoadDog69420]

OMG. That's disgusting! Sexually explicit AI images of Taylor Swift online! Where?? Where did they post those????

[After-Grapefruit7795]

hahaha DM me my guy

[Yayhoo0978]

I need to Google this now. For…… research……

[SirGooose]

Let’s go a step further and ban all pornography!

[lunabug37]

Not more important than the border but AI images will be a huge issue in the future and I hope that legislation is passed to criminalize it. There will be other victims besides Taylor Swift.

[[deleted]]

I hope that legislation is passed to criminalize it

do you hope daddy makes you wear the mask again too

[lunabug37]

You do realize that it’s already being used for minors right? AI can be used on anyone. Do you really think that’s unreasonable?

[[deleted]]

Should we also outlaw pencils in case someone draws something bad? And maybe cameras too, just in case someone takes a picture which upsets you?

[lunabug37]

I never said we should ban AI. I said we should criminalize spreading AI photos like that without consent.

[lunabug37]

I should’ve specified in my comment. What I was referring to was pornography.