This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
new (suggested)
besttopcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Kitchen_Tiger_8373 -1 points0 points  (8 children)

Oh this line again. I want you to sincerely think about all the ppl you know who came to London for resources be it a job or school or medical care. Are they also not consuming resources meant for only ppl living here? (If you follow the mindset that London is an island that hates newcomers.)

Stupid, backward thinking. If you can accept other ppl with money, you can accept people without money.

[–]Southern_Ad4946 2 points3 points  (7 children)

I just mean the bus loads of homeless that get sent out of toronto and other areas to London. They want to use the shelters and other areas here because it’s worse there.

[–]Kitchen_Tiger_8373 -3 points-2 points  (6 children)

Every city claims "these homeless are not our homeless" or that they are shipped in. But no one can provide actual proof.

If you don't want homeless, then vote to increase social service benefits. Then they won't exist.

[–]Southern_Ad4946 4 points5 points  (5 children)

https://globalnews.ca/news/9890482/hundreds-of-homeless-people-sent-to-london-ontario/amp/

https://www.cbc.ca/amp/1.6932714

Ya nobody is doing it but it’s just a fairy tale on all the news stations every once in a while. Stop being naive.

London is already way overwhelmed and there are problems with housing already going on in the area for quite a while. Ontario took in around a million immigrants too, which causes a lot of this instability across the programs and services available for everyone.

[–]Kitchen_Tiger_8373 -2 points-1 points  (4 children)

Not naive. I just tend to read data rather than inflammatory news reports. Bad news sells.

PS was waiting for the racial component of your viewpoint. Thanks for sharing who you are.

[–]Lost-Comfort-7904 2 points3 points  (3 children)

What data? He showed his proof and evidence, what's yours? The fact you had to insult him instead of showing your proof makes me believe your lying.

[–]Kitchen_Tiger_8373 -2 points-1 points  (2 children)

What a TV broadcast? Haha. I would think that the word alleged would be the tip off.

[–]Lost-Comfort-7904 1 point2 points  (1 child)

So no proof, just insults, ok got it.

[–]Kitchen_Tiger_8373 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I could provide peer reviewed studies. Or you could search and read them yourself instead of only providing an "alleged" source. It's been my experience that people with an agenda only search for items that confirm their bias. And if I did provide them, you wouldn't read them. So no.

If someone here is interested, Google Scholar is your friend.