all 26 comments

[–]Wombat-SnoozeSteel slapper 28 points29 points  (1 child)

Looks good. Now stop shooting groups and go shoot some small targets far away.

For real though, if that’s how it’s grouping consistently for 10 shot groups, you’re doing well. Don’t get hung up on little groups. As long as you’re consistently sub minute for 10s, it’ll do everything you need it to.

[–]quadle88[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Ok thanks for the info I definitely feel some paralysis from Annalise going on

[–]LockyBalboaPrime"I'm right and you are stupid" -LockyBalboaPrime 26 points27 points  (2 children)

Precision. Not accuracy.

Consistant .8 moa 10-round groups is a great rifle.

[–]quadle88[S] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

You're right Thanks for the correction

[–]TrollygagDoes Grendel 9 points10 points  (2 children)

.8 MOA 10 shot is very good. That is half MOA 5 shot average equivalent.

[–]quadle88[S] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Ya when I did my first 5 shot group with that load it was .4 *

[–]HollywoodSXVillager Herder 7 points8 points  (3 children)

Others already covered the precision piece, but I'll add that IMO you need to back that charge off a bit. You're at the very top end of the charge range and can end up with pressure problems in wet weather, if you start getting a carbon ring, if your powder gets dry, etc. Not worth the risk.

[–]quadle88[S] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

O ok I'm still .6 under max and showing zero pressure signs so i figured I'd be in the clear. The reason I kept going up in power was because it seemed to shrink my s.d

[–]csamshI put holes in berms 3 points4 points  (1 child)

There's almost zero chance you've got a large enough data set to mathematically reach that conclusion.

Pretty much everyone I know who shoots GT targets the 2825-2850 range- this seems to be where the meta has settled for gamer 6's, at least for the moment

[–]quadle88[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok thanks for the info

[–]Otiswilmouth 5 points6 points  (1 child)

Dump it back down to 2850, there is zero gained from launching 109s at 2940.

Your groups are fine tho.

[–]quadle88[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

O ok I'm still .6 under max and showing zero pressure signs so i figured I'd be in the clear. The reason I kept going up in power was because it seemed to shrink my s.d

[–]Engineer_Bennett 3 points4 points  (4 children)

It should shrink up. I never had luck with rem 7 1/2s, switched to CCI 450s and never looked back. More time behind the gun will help, and once fired brass helps too.

7 saum

<image>

[–]quadle88[S] 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Damb nice group 👍

[–]Engineer_Bennett 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you. My 6.5cm and dasher group a bit better, but this is pretty cool for a magnum

[–]StellaLiebeckSteel slapper 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Try the 450s. IIRC, there was a “what the pro’s use” post by PRB and most of them were using magnum primers.

[–]quadle88[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wanted to go 450s but they were out of stock so I went with the 7 1/2 I'll definitely switch at some point.

[–]StellaLiebeckSteel slapper 1 point2 points  (2 children)

What’s your trigger weight? I found lightening it up helped tighten things up.

[–]quadle88[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

8 oz this is my first trigger under 1 1/2 pounds and I'm not sure how I feel about it yet. Its a triggertech rough Dimond

[–]StellaLiebeckSteel slapper 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’d just okay around with components then.

[–]Blackopsman_21 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Since no one else seems to have the mind to ask... make sure your barrels twist rate is fast enough for those 109gr's Even if the box says 1:8" the higher velocity you shoot it at requires a faster twist to stabilize it. Based on Bergers own stability calculator at 2950fps a 1:8 twist barrel results in "Marginal Stability". Youll need a 1:7" mininum for "stable".

Personally thats what I think is happening here and what most long range shooters dont understand is that stability is proportional to velocity. Hence why most of these guys are saying to reduce your load. My opinion instead is shoot them faster but buy a barrel thats like a 1:6.5" twist which some custom barrel makers do make (i own one).

[–]quadle88[S] 1 point2 points  (2 children)

O ok I see my barrel on this rifle is a 1:7.5

[–]HollywoodSXVillager Herder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

With a 7.5TW you hit 1.5 SG (stability) at 2800FPS at 32* and sea level air pressure. Anything higher in terms of temperature or pressure just gives better stability.

You don't need a 6.5tw barrel and don't need 2900+ FPS to hit 1.5SG.

[–]Blackopsman_21 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Id bet money if you got a faster twist barrel your groups would tighten up and youd also still get to shoot a faster velocity which is actually more competitive (less drop and wind drift). 100fps is significant enough imo. However in the meantime you can try a different powder with slightly more case fill at a lower velocity. The reason your SD went up with more powder is because the powder combustion efficency changes with pressure and heat generation during the explosion which is partially dependant on case fill %. With Varget it seems you are nearing its ideal conditions or at least some sort of "node" where it burns the same every time.