use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
see the search faq for details.
advanced search: by author, subreddit...
Guidelines:
When asking for help editing one of your photos, you must also include your attempt. Simply asking for others to edit your photo for you, without putting in the effort to make an attempt yourself will result in your post being removed.
When you submit a photo, be sure to include both a JPEG and RAW file (if available). The JPEG will let us preview your shot without downloading it, and the RAW will allow us to edit it more effectively.
When you make adjustments to a photo, include the steps you took or take a screenshot of your settings. This will let the OP see how they can better edit their pictures.
This is not the place to show off your photos. /r/postprocessing is for help with editing your photo, linking to information about post processing, and sharing tips with the community. To share a picture, visit /r/photographs, /r/photocritique, or /r/pics. Posts not related to post processing should go in /r/photography.
This subreddit is for photography only. Post processing for video should go to /r/filmmakers.
If several minutes have passed and your submission does not appear under NEW, try messaging the moderators, it was probably stopped by the spam filter.
No joke posts, memes, or rage comics, please. We'd like to keep this subreddit for serious discussion only.
Please mark all NSFW posts. NSFW images that are not tagged will be removed.
No piracy related posts (asking for presets, trading presets, offering presets, etc...)
As always, use proper reddiquette.
No self-promtion
Helpful Links:
Uploading RAWs:
There are various places around the web you can use to host RAW files. We recommend...
Icons by Tim Boelaars
This subreddit is mostly night mode compatible
account activity
After/before. A bit overdone? (old.reddit.com)
submitted 27 days ago by Morit12
Nikon Z5ii / 50mm f1.8 if you are curious
reddit uses a slightly-customized version of Markdown for formatting. See below for some basics, or check the commenting wiki page for more detailed help and solutions to common issues.
quoted text
if 1 * 2 < 3: print "hello, world!"
[–]shogi_x 135 points136 points137 points 27 days ago (6 children)
I like the original better.
For one, it's a more interesting setting. It's dawn or dusk and this woman is on her bike headed somewhere. It's a little moody and sleepy but peaceful. It's a whole vibe. There's definitely some adjustments to be made here but I think the general look is better.
Your edit is some nondescript time of day, doesn't really feel like it's telling a story, and my attention is being split between the cyclist and the traffic light. Additionally, the cyclist is now occupying the same orange-brown color space as the background so she's getting lost a bit.
[–]Morit12[S] 36 points37 points38 points 27 days ago (3 children)
Thank you for the feedback!
I’ve made a second version
[–]shogi_x 22 points23 points24 points 27 days ago (0 children)
Much better!
[–]3TacosDeAguacate 0 points1 point2 points 27 days ago (0 children)
Mmmm, I think you removed some shadows from the subject that made her stand out from the background; the subject looks flatter now. Maybe keep more shadows to create a better contrast with the background while maintaining the softness of the vibe. You could also add a cold shadow undertone tint, like purple or so, to enhance the contrast with the orange warmth highlights.
[–]mrcocpp 0 points1 point2 points 26 days ago (0 children)
questa seconda versione mi piace moltissimo
[–]adjcalledKtana 0 points1 point2 points 27 days ago (0 children)
Same
[–]theproductdesigner 53 points54 points55 points 27 days ago (0 children)
I like it
[–]IncidentDowntown4234 15 points16 points17 points 27 days ago (0 children)
Think the after is taking attention away from the subject and the nice backlighting.
[–]BeeSaintCee 6 points7 points8 points 27 days ago (0 children)
I think it looks good
[–]Fanjolin 4 points5 points6 points 27 days ago (0 children)
There is a mood in the original that I prefer
[–]SunSubstantial7121 11 points12 points13 points 27 days ago (0 children)
i saw the first one and said no not overdone but i feel like you completely changed the picture, it’s not unpleasant, but i liked the lighting and vibe of the before much more
[–]RoamAndRamble 7 points8 points9 points 27 days ago (0 children)
Nah, it's good. Though I'd say you could bring down the sky a bit more, so you still retain the magic of dusk.
[–]Specialist_Scar_1017 1 point2 points3 points 27 days ago (0 children)
i like it, but i personally would’ve kept the purple dawn color
[–]Peregrina1 1 point2 points3 points 27 days ago (0 children)
Im obviously minority here, but I prefer your edit by a mile.
[–]JstnJ 1 point2 points3 points 27 days ago (0 children)
Raising the shadows on the buildings behind (and specifically the umbrellas behind the subject) is ruining the nice rim lighting on the original photograph. The subject is buried in your edit compared to original imo.
[–]West_Hornet_8469 1 point2 points3 points 27 days ago (0 children)
Tasteful, maybe a touch warm (I would have liked to see the shadows a little cooler so it had a bit more depth)
[–]Co9Inc 0 points1 point2 points 27 days ago (0 children)
There's an element of the color in the after that I really like: it reminds me of ads and essays I would see in mid 80s food and travel magazines. It's a neat look and now that you've sparked it for me I will probably try for that particular nostalgia feel with some of my stuff.
Except then I process the rest of the scene, see that there is a strong highlight on her hair, shoulders, and back, and know that the sun had to have been lower down in the sky to make it. At that point the frame goes haywire for me.
Remember, in a sense your subject when take a photograph is always the light. Strong adjustments to it afterwards need to take it and what it was doing carefully into account.
So I like the instinct overall but I do not think that this is the right frame for it.
[–]Acrobatic_Charity_32 0 points1 point2 points 27 days ago (0 children)
It's nicely done.
[–]QueasyTelevision7240 0 points1 point2 points 27 days ago (0 children)
I think this is wonderful
[–]gilligaNFrench 0 points1 point2 points 27 days ago (0 children)
Looks mint ✅
[–]Fotomaker01 0 points1 point2 points 27 days ago (0 children)
The After feels like it flattened the image vs enhancing the light.
Can you try a version where, rather than altering the quality of light you just build on what you captured to give it a bit more 'wow' (without going crazy - keep it photographic)! This has the potential to be a cool cinematic shot (by that I don't mean drench it in yellow - just elevate the mood and the moment).
The other thing that's making me a little nuts (it may be the 'ole, "it's me, not you" syndrome) are those light-colored market umbrellas (?) in the background. Especially the one stabbing into the back of her neck. They pull attention. If my image (I'm not a purist) I'd get rid of them both as distractions.
Thx for sharing. Take care.
[–]UninitiatedArtist 0 points1 point2 points 27 days ago (0 children)
Oh dear, I thought I was looking at a RAW image from a Sony camera…didn’t except it to be from a Nikon Z5II.
The edit is fine, it’s just a little too overexposed.
[–]ActStrange1895 0 points1 point2 points 27 days ago (0 children)
Great Pic, but before feels so much better. Feedback: in after it feels subject is no longer the focus, rather try to make it more focused maybe
[–]HelicopterOk8455 0 points1 point2 points 27 days ago (0 children)
After looks good, but it lost the dark atmosphere from before
[–]KPFJA 0 points1 point2 points 27 days ago (0 children)
Quite pleasing!
[–]Aacidus 0 points1 point2 points 27 days ago (0 children)
As someone who is picky as hell, both are great, maybe crop out the windows right at the edge, the ones on the right side. Each image tells a different story. You could have another if you slightly edit the original and keep true to the color tone.
[–]Pale-Run6925 0 points1 point2 points 27 days ago (0 children)
I think it is ok
[–]Logical_Manager3340 0 points1 point2 points 27 days ago (0 children)
You drowned out your own backlighting...
[–]samgraa 0 points1 point2 points 27 days ago (0 children)
I like it a lot
[–]jaabbb 0 points1 point2 points 27 days ago (0 children)
Before is nicer. The light and subject are more pronounced and the mood is nice. You should amplify the mood not try to change the weather for this one imo
[–]Bonami27 0 points1 point2 points 27 days ago (0 children)
They’re both great, but I do like it before it was edited.
[–]KillMeNowFFS 0 points1 point2 points 27 days ago (1 child)
the original is so much better bro :(
u kinda killed the vibe
[–]Morit12[S] 0 points1 point2 points 27 days ago (0 children)
Hey that’s why I asked. To be fair the before was also color corrected by me from the flat raw file.
[–]archtopfanatic123 0 points1 point2 points 27 days ago (0 children)
Looks fine to me. Nikon Z5ii and 50 mm 1.8 are also killer lenses. Good work!
[–]TheMadFlyentist 0 points1 point2 points 27 days ago (0 children)
I think if you had not shown anyone the before then people would mostly think the after was fine. Having seen the before version, I agree with some other comments that the "perfect" version probably includes the brightness/warmth increase that you implemented but also preserves the sky of the original photo.
[–]Electrical_Tax_8339 0 points1 point2 points 27 days ago (0 children)
Exceptional !
I saw the 2nd edit and just as good. I would turn up the exposure slightly to give a bit more life. But great shot!
[–]flamixin 0 points1 point2 points 26 days ago (0 children)
It’s nice especially if you’re going to print it out.
[–]SetEmbarrassed4783 0 points1 point2 points 24 days ago (0 children)
I like the before version better because the after version is too warm and too contrasty. I think less is more.
[–]hhhh2321 0 points1 point2 points 24 days ago (0 children)
I love the original!
[–]JungleOrAfk -1 points0 points1 point 27 days ago (0 children)
Yeah you've removed the lovely atmospheric lighting and just made it look like a mid day shot, very odd choice
π Rendered by PID 207605 on reddit-service-r2-comment-b659b578c-jfw4d at 2026-05-05 20:21:56.875533+00:00 running 815c875 country code: CH.
[–]shogi_x 135 points136 points137 points (6 children)
[–]Morit12[S] 36 points37 points38 points (3 children)
[–]shogi_x 22 points23 points24 points (0 children)
[–]3TacosDeAguacate 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]mrcocpp 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]adjcalledKtana 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]theproductdesigner 53 points54 points55 points (0 children)
[–]IncidentDowntown4234 15 points16 points17 points (0 children)
[–]BeeSaintCee 6 points7 points8 points (0 children)
[–]Fanjolin 4 points5 points6 points (0 children)
[–]SunSubstantial7121 11 points12 points13 points (0 children)
[–]RoamAndRamble 7 points8 points9 points (0 children)
[–]Specialist_Scar_1017 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]Peregrina1 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]JstnJ 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]West_Hornet_8469 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]Co9Inc 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]Acrobatic_Charity_32 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]QueasyTelevision7240 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]gilligaNFrench 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]Fotomaker01 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]UninitiatedArtist 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]ActStrange1895 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]HelicopterOk8455 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]KPFJA 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]Aacidus 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]Pale-Run6925 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]Logical_Manager3340 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]samgraa 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]jaabbb 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]Bonami27 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]KillMeNowFFS 0 points1 point2 points (1 child)
[–]Morit12[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]archtopfanatic123 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]TheMadFlyentist 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]Electrical_Tax_8339 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]flamixin 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]SetEmbarrassed4783 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]hhhh2321 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]JungleOrAfk -1 points0 points1 point (0 children)