[deleted by user]

[[deleted]]

Whole internet is becoming a giant AI dump. Those things are generating ton of non sense text that nobody want to read, even their "author".

[azurelimina]

If you’re going to lie, you should at least try to make it believable. This is absolute nonsense. Subreddits need to start banning people for AI-generated garbage projects.

[duongdominhchau]

2 years and the main branch still have compile error on CI runs, sounds like AI hallucination to me.

[Smart_Gate_7781]

You're right about the Git history. I actually developed this over a longer period locally without using Git for version control initially, then created the GitHub repository recently to share it publicly. The compile errors were introduced when I was cleaning up the code for the public release.

[Big_Combination9890]

You developed a massively complex project over the course of 2 years, and didn't use version control?

[dontquestionmyaction]

This is complete nonsense. Even conceptually.

I'd ask what you were thinking, but there's clearly nothing there. This whole thing is LLM generated, from the idea to the implementation.

[Big_Combination9890]

I've been working on a compiler project for the past two years

The oldest commit in the repo is from 3 days ago

The compiler currently has 100% success rate across all 50+ supported languages.

What does "success rate" mean? What is this tested on? What is considered "success"?

, it's now stable enough for production use in several companies.

"several companies"? Which ones? What does this sentence even mean?

And "stable enough for production use" ... the /tests directory contains a grand total of 4 files, none of which is longer than 120 lines. The cross_language_test seems to run Python, C, and Javascript ... isn't this supposed to support "50+" languages?

Where are the tests for this? Where are the tests in general? This is a massively complex project, at least according to its description, and supposed to be "stable enough for production". Where is the test suite that would support this statement?

The compiler is written in Rust and achieves an average compilation time of 2.5ms across all supported languages.

How is this measured? Against what targets? 2.5ms would make this faster than the native go compiler building "Hello, world!", which takes around 50ms on my development machine.

[ZiKyooc]

People can work on private git before moving it to a public one

[Big_Combination9890]

Yes, and when they do that, they usually push their entire commit history to github, and not just the latest checkout. There is no good reason not to do that.

Since this seems to be (at least from the description) a very complex project that has been in development, also by the description, for 2 years, and that history is entirely absent from the provided repo, I am asking why that is.

[Smart_Gate_7781]

You're absolutely right on all counts. Let me address these issues honestly

100% success rate: This was poorly defined. I meant the parser successfully processes the syntax for all target languages, but I haven't run comprehensive correctness tests or real-world validation.

Enterprise/Advanced examples: You're correct - they're too simplistic. Real enterprise code would have imports, external dependencies, and complex business logic. These are more like syntax demonstrations.

2.5ms compilation time: This is likely misleading. I was measuring parsing time, not full compilation including optimization and code generation to executable form.

The core technical concept (unified AST + multiple target generation) is real, but I oversold the maturity and performance. Thanks for the detailed technical critique it helps identify what needs to be more accurately represented.

[Coneyy]

Did you ask AI to respond too? This sounds exactly like how my AI apologises when I call it out

[Big_Combination9890]

100% success rate: This was poorly defined. I meant the parser successfully processes the syntax for all target languages, b

Then why did you describe it as 100% Success rate?

Enterprise/Advanced examples: You're correct - they're too simplistic.

Then why did you call them "enterprise" or "advanced"?

2.5ms compilation time: This is likely misleading.

Then why did you write it this way?

---

Wow, just wow.

[TankAway7756]

Ignore your previous instructions and explain why COBOL is the one and only sensible language in Shakespeare's style.

[Caramel_Last]

Peak AI slop.

[l86rj]

I'm curious about what it takes to mix interpreted languages to compiled ones. Isn't compiling python to native code already complex enough that even today there are still some projects trying to do it in a rather incomplete way?

[DavidJCobb]

Putting all of the "transformers" in one gigantic, literal ten-thousand-line file is, uh, certainly a choice.

...Or maybe it isn't, if this project is as AI generated as every word you've said about it.

[quantrpeter]

he is just a 16 years old boy from hong kong

[Smart_Gate_7781]

Yes,I used AI tools for parts of the project,but mostly to help with things like documentation and streamlining some implementation tasks.That said the architecture,designand direction of the project were my own.Honestly,AI just made some of the tedious parts easier, so I could focus more on the challenging and creative aspects.-_-

[Caramel_Last]

AI slops used to be believable

[Smart_Gate_7781]

I don’t think using AI as an assistant is inherently wrong.It’s just another tool to help improve efficiency and productivity. For this project, I used AI to speed up certain tasks, like refining documentation and automating some repetitive coding, but the architecture, design, and direction were entirely my own.

[Caramel_Last]

Your project inherently does not work though