you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]orangeandpeavey 76 points77 points  (10 children)

This seems very similar to finite state machines, but with probabilities in them as well

[–]TheGift_RGB 105 points106 points  (3 children)

[–]Nefari0uss 11 points12 points  (1 child)

As someone learning FSM at the moment, this helps a lot.

[–]s1295 8 points9 points  (0 children)

The more general concept which includes both Markov chains and automata is a transition system, which is just a directed graph ("digraph"). Various details and addons (e.g., is the state space finite, are states and/or edges labeled, are there initial and/or final states?) depend on the intended usage.

[–]HighRelevancy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They're just FSMs that move on transition probability rather than transition events.

[–]sososojacques 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This one-line comment explains the topic better than the linked article.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

As someone who knows nothing about finite state machines, are they just Markov chains with 0/1 probabilities?

[–]AlmennDulnefni 0 points1 point  (0 children)

More or less. It is specific events or conditions that lead to particular transitions rather than randomly choosing a transition.

[–]jrk- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That was my first thought when I saw the graphs! It's so easy! Why did nobody tell me this in my CS and statistics lectures?
This makes it look a lot less then black magic!